WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:04.720
Thank you to Odoo for supporting PBS.&nbsp;
Add up every positive whole number—one&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04.720 --> 00:11.280
plus two plus three plus four etc —and eventually&nbsp;
you get infinity. And yet, if you do some careful&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:11.280 --> 00:17.600
mathematical trickery, a very different number&nbsp;
appears: minus one twelfth. Maybe you saw this&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:17.600 --> 00:21.920
strange result do the rounds of the internet a&nbsp;
few years ago. Maybe you also correctly surmised&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:21.920 --> 00:27.360
that it’s just some mathematical sleight of hand.&nbsp;
But maybe you didn’t know that exactly this way&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:27.360 --> 00:33.840
of extracting finite numbers from infinities is&nbsp;
at the heart of some famous results in physics.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:33.840 --> 00:36.910
Some of them are even equal to minus a twelfth.

00:39.058 --> 00:42.658
what learning actually does to you. Links&nbsp;
to the merch store in the description.&nbsp;

00:42.658 --> 00:46.738
When you add an infinite list of numbers&nbsp;
together, sometimes the result settles down&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:46.738 --> 00:52.738
to a finite value. For example, a half plus a&nbsp;
quarter plus an eighth and so on equals one. As&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:52.738 --> 00:59.298
long as we’re careful about ensuring convergence,&nbsp;
then an infinite sum can equal a finite number.&nbsp;

00:59.298 --> 01:05.698
But many infinite series do not converge—their&nbsp;
result really is infinity. And it is pretty&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:05.698 --> 01:10.898
obvious that the sum of the natural&nbsp;
numbers is such a divergent series. 1+2+3+&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:10.898 --> 01:16.978
etc equals infinity. So why were people&nbsp;
going around saying that it equals -1/12?&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:16.978 --> 01:24.338
It takes a bit of mathematical hocus pocus,
The OG viral video on this is on Numberphile,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:24.338 --> 01:28.578
and their “proof” does some rather&nbsp;
loose arithmetic with a few different&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:28.578 --> 01:32.818
infinite series. And by loose, I mean not&nbsp;
mathematically valid. It’s linked below,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:32.818 --> 01:38.498
as well as my favorite debunking video. Now, to be&nbsp;
fair to Numberphile, that video was trying to give&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:38.498 --> 01:44.818
an intuitive description of a much more rigorous&nbsp;
argument based on the Riemann zeta function.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:44.818 --> 01:51.138
This is a famous function—subject of the famous&nbsp;
Riemann hypothesis, which as of this recording&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:51.138 --> 01:55.538
hasn’t been solved by AI yet.
It can be written as&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:55.538 --> 02:05.138
sum-over-n-from-one-to-infinity of 1/n^s. As long&nbsp;
as s is greater than 1, the function converges. In&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:05.138 --> 02:11.858
fact, the infinite series itself only defines the&nbsp;
zeta function for values of s greater than one.&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:11.858 --> 02:17.858
But a creative mathematician can rewrite the same&nbsp;
function in other forms that agree perfectly with&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:17.858 --> 02:25.378
that series wherever it converges, and those&nbsp;
new expressions continue smoothly into values&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:25.378 --> 02:34.418
where the original sum diverges. That process is&nbsp;
analytic continuation. At s=-1, this analytically&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:34.418 --> 02:41.538
continued zeta function has the value minus&nbsp;
one twelfth. 3blue1brown has an amazing video&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:41.538 --> 02:45.938
on this stuff, also linked below.
None of this means that 1+2+3+..&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:45.938 --> 02:53.458
et cetera equals -1/12. It doesn’t. That&nbsp;
fraction is the zeta-regularized part of a&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:53.458 --> 03:01.298
genuinely divergent sum. But this also isn’t&nbsp;
just a cheap maths trick. This result really&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:01.298 --> 03:07.858
does show up in physics. And in physics it's&nbsp;
actually been measured. With the Casimir effect.&nbsp;

03:07.858 --> 03:15.538
So, in 1948 Hendrik Casimir figured out a&nbsp;
way to delete part of the quantum vacuum.&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:15.538 --> 03:20.338
As you may have heard, empty space isn’t really&nbsp;
empty. Quantum field theory describes it as being&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:20.338 --> 03:25.378
filled with quantum fields in their vacuum&nbsp;
state. Each field supports an enormous range&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:25.378 --> 03:30.498
of possible vibrational modes, and even when&nbsp;
none of those modes contains a real particle,&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:30.498 --> 03:36.418
each still retains an irreducible amount of&nbsp;
quantum fluctuation at every allowed wavelength.&nbsp;

03:36.418 --> 03:42.418
OK, now take a pair of conducting plates and put&nbsp;
them extremely close together. The plates exclude&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:42.418 --> 03:49.138
a bunch of modes in the quantum electromagnetic&nbsp;
field in particular. Only EM waves whose nodes&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:49.138 --> 03:55.458
line up with the plates are allowed—and that&nbsp;
means those for which an integer number of&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:55.458 --> 04:02.178
half-wavelengths fit exactly in the gap width.&nbsp;
It’s just like a guitar string—its sound is the&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:02.178 --> 04:08.338
combination of those notes whose half-wavelengths&nbsp;
fit between the fixed ends of the string. That’s&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:08.338 --> 04:13.858
a 1-D analogy, but even with the Casimir&nbsp;
effect, one dimension gives the right idea.

04:13.858 --> 04:18.178
We can also think in terms of frequency&nbsp;
instead of wavelength. There’s a smallest&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:18.178 --> 04:26.418
allowed frequency and then only frequencies that&nbsp;
are an integer multiple of this are allowed,&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:26.418 --> 04:33.618
but all such frequencies are allowed. The energy&nbsp;
of each mode is proportional to its frequency,&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:33.618 --> 04:38.018
so if you want the total energy in&nbsp;
allowed EM modes between Casimir&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:38.018 --> 04:48.258
plates you get some base energy times 1+2+3 etc.
That sum should now sound very familiar. It sounds&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:48.258 --> 04:54.658
like it predicts that there's infinite energy in&nbsp;
the vacuum between our Casimir plates. And that’s&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:54.658 --> 05:01.458
after excluding certain modes—which means there&nbsp;
should be infinity … plus? energy outside the&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:01.458 --> 05:07.138
plates. This “prediction” of infinite energy in&nbsp;
the quantum vacuum is not something we can take&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:07.138 --> 05:14.418
literally. To compare the vacuum within the plates&nbsp;
to the vacuum without them, we introduce a cutoff&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:14.418 --> 05:20.978
that temporarily stops us from adding arbitrarily&nbsp;
high-frequency modes. For real metal plates this&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:20.978 --> 05:26.498
even has a physical motivation: at sufficiently&nbsp;
high frequencies the metal stops behaving like a&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:26.498 --> 05:32.418
perfect reflector, so those modes barely notice&nbsp;
that the plates are there. But cutoff or no,&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:32.418 --> 05:36.578
as long as this background energy is the&nbsp;
same between one location and another,&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:36.578 --> 05:41.538
it feels like there’s nothing there. We only&nbsp;
detect differences in energy. Which is why&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:41.538 --> 05:47.458
those excluded modes between the Casimir plates&nbsp;
are important. Both the inside and outside of the&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:47.458 --> 05:55.218
plates&nbsp;appear to add up to infinite or very large&nbsp;
energy, but after regulating them in the same way,&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:55.218 --> 06:01.378
the vacuum energy with the plates is slightly&nbsp;
lower than the reference vacuum outside them.&nbsp;

06:01.378 --> 06:06.338
There’s a process for comparing infinities&nbsp;
to find their finite difference. The trick,&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:06.338 --> 06:13.058
as I hinted, is to separate the varying finite&nbsp;
part of the sum from a shared infinite part.&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:13.058 --> 06:18.658
That latter part can be expressed as a shared&nbsp;
high-energy cutoff. This process of introducing&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:18.658 --> 06:24.898
a cutoff to deal with divergent terms is one&nbsp;
way to do what we call regularization. Zeta&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:24.898 --> 06:30.818
regularization, which involves the analytic&nbsp;
continuation I mentioned, is another way.&nbsp;

06:30.818 --> 06:35.138
So, in the Casimir effect, we figure&nbsp;
out what divergent part is shared by&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:35.138 --> 06:41.858
the interior and exterior of the plates and&nbsp;
subtract that. We end up with a Casimir energy&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:41.858 --> 06:51.138
of pi-hbar-c/d * ½ * -1/12. The first factor&nbsp;
sets the energy scale of the fundamental mode,&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:51.138 --> 06:55.698
where (d) is the distance between the plates, ½&nbsp;
comes from the zero point energy of the quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:55.698 --> 07:01.378
oscillator. And then there’s the -1/12. And&nbsp;
yes, it’s back. And it’s back for the same&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:01.378 --> 07:07.778
reason—we plucked a finite part of an infinity.
Here the minus sign really matters because it&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:07.778 --> 07:13.538
tells us that energy gets even lower as the plates&nbsp;
move closer together. The system therefore lowers&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:13.538 --> 07:20.098
its energy by shrinking the gap—and that&nbsp;
means an attractive force. The resulting&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:20.098 --> 07:25.058
force has been successfully measured, and the&nbsp;
Casimir effect has been verified, and it’s&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:25.058 --> 07:31.138
exactly what we expect from the weird maths.
The real three-dimensional electromagnetic&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:31.138 --> 07:36.738
calculation is more complicated because the modes&nbsp;
can also carry momentum parallel to the plates and&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:36.738 --> 07:42.178
because the electromagnetic field has multiple&nbsp;
polarizations. But the same basic logic works,&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:42.178 --> 07:49.858
though the -1/12 is instead +1/120.&nbsp;
But yeah, the infinite sum really does&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:49.858 --> 07:55.698
sometimes come out to -1/12 or something,&nbsp;
but only in the context of regularization&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:55.698 --> 08:01.778
and renormalization, which I’ll come back to.
But first it’s time for some string theory—which&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:01.778 --> 08:07.698
may or may not have anything to do with&nbsp;
nature. But our -1/12 shows up here too,&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:07.698 --> 08:11.698
and actually gives us one of string&nbsp;
theory’s weirdest properties.&nbsp;

08:11.698 --> 08:16.738
So, string theory replaces point particles&nbsp;
with tiny filaments vibrating across multiple&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:16.738 --> 08:22.098
compact dimensions. Just like a guitar&nbsp;
string, a quantum string can vibrate in&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:22.098 --> 08:27.458
different modes, and those modes determine&nbsp;
the properties of the emergent particles.&nbsp;

08:27.458 --> 08:33.538
In the guitar string and Casimir, the allowed&nbsp;
modes come from the fact that their ends are fixed&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:33.538 --> 08:39.138
in place. Quantum strings also have a boundary&nbsp;
condition, but in the case of closed strings,&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:39.138 --> 08:44.338
which we’ll focus on, it’s because the strings&nbsp;
are loops. Every oscillation has to match up&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:44.338 --> 08:50.018
with itself when traced around the loop. But the&nbsp;
result is the same. Allowed frequency and energy&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:50.018 --> 08:57.058
modes are every integer multiple of the base mode.&nbsp;
Which means we once again have a divergent sum.&nbsp;

08:57.058 --> 09:03.778
In the case of the quantum string, regularization&nbsp;
involves introducing a cutoff. However,&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:03.778 --> 09:09.858
this cutoff feels less ad hoc than in regular&nbsp;
QFT. The thing we want to calculate based on&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:09.858 --> 09:14.898
these stringy oscillations is the overall energy&nbsp;
spectrum of the string. What are the possible&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:14.898 --> 09:21.938
global oscillations? The shortest-wavelength modes&nbsp;
may correspond to extreme energies. But at those&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:21.938 --> 09:28.978
tiny scales, such a fluctuation only sees an&nbsp;
infinitesimal patch of the total string—it&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:28.978 --> 09:34.658
doesn't know about the global periodicity.
Those high-frequency contributions are at both&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:34.658 --> 09:39.458
local and constant all around the string,&nbsp;
and don’t contribute to the string’s energy&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:39.458 --> 09:44.418
spectrum that we’re trying to calculate. We&nbsp;
can ignore them in the same way that we can&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:44.418 --> 09:50.658
regularize away the high-frequency modes between&nbsp;
the Casimir plates when those tiny fluctuations&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:50.658 --> 09:56.818
have no idea the plates are even there.
So again we have a cutoff for our infinite&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:56.818 --> 10:02.018
sum and lets us figure out the size of the&nbsp;
finite component of the string’s vibrations.&nbsp;

10:02.018 --> 10:06.658
A couple of things for perfect precision. First,&nbsp;
I’ve been talking about oscillations around a&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:06.658 --> 10:13.938
1-D loop. Really, we think of the string’s loop&nbsp;
as sweeping out a 2-D surface over time that we&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:13.938 --> 10:21.058
call a worldsheet. Second, all of this stuff—the&nbsp;
string, its worldsheet—are embedded within some&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:21.058 --> 10:26.098
larger number of spatial dimensions. Could be&nbsp;
3 like our universe, could be more. We’ll say&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:26.098 --> 10:33.138
it’s D dimensions for now and see what happens.
Once we account for the redundancies in how we&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:33.138 --> 10:38.578
describe the surface of the worldsheet, the&nbsp;
genuinely physical vibrations of the string&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:38.578 --> 10:45.698
are transverse to the string’s direction of&nbsp;
motion. That leaves D-2 independent transverse&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:45.698 --> 10:51.938
directions in which the string can oscillate.&nbsp;
In ordinary four-dimensional spacetime that&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:51.938 --> 10:58.818
would leave two physical transverse&nbsp;
directions, but more if D is larger.&nbsp;

10:58.818 --> 11:04.018
And every one of those directions has&nbsp;
its own infinite tower of modes. So&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:04.018 --> 11:08.627
the total zero-point contribution is&nbsp;
proportional to the energy is this:&nbsp;

11:08.627 --> 11:11.378
\frac{D-2}{2} (1+2+3+4+\ldots).
Now use the same regulation trick&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:11.378 --> 11:16.578
as we used for the Casimir effect to get rid&nbsp;
of the inconsequential high energy modes. In&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:16.578 --> 11:22.178
the quantized string this shows up as a shift&nbsp;
in the string’s energy spectrum—the so-called&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:22.178 --> 11:27.858
normal-ordering constant. We again use the&nbsp;
Riemann zeta function to replace the infinite&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:27.858 --> 11:33.058
sum with -1/12, giving us:
-\frac{D-2}{24}.&nbsp;

11:33.058 --> 11:38.978
And this is where the -1/12 has some crazy&nbsp;
consequences. Now I have to get a bit hand-wavey&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:38.978 --> 11:44.178
here, so please forgive me. If we bring in&nbsp;
relativity and force the quantum theory on&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:44.178 --> 11:52.258
the worldsheet to preserve Lorentz symmetry, the&nbsp;
D-2/24 part has to equal one. This is the only&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:52.258 --> 11:59.058
relationship consistent with our non-negotiable&nbsp;
symmetries. But this is only possible if D equals&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:59.058 --> 12:04.818
26. And D is the number of dimensions. So yeah,&nbsp;
if you’ve heard that string theory requires lots&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:04.818 --> 12:11.218
of hidden dimensions, it’s because that&nbsp;
-1/12 is forcing string theory’s hand.&nbsp;

12:11.218 --> 12:15.378
D here is the famous critical dimension&nbsp;
of bosonic string theory. Now, bosonic&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:15.378 --> 12:19.138
string theory itself is not a realistic&nbsp;
theory of nature. Among other problems,&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:19.138 --> 12:24.818
it doesn’t naturally have fermions, which are&nbsp;
needed for actual matter. Modern string theories&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:24.818 --> 12:31.218
do include fermionic vibrations on the worldsheet,&nbsp;
and these partially cancel the bosonic vibrations,&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:31.218 --> 12:37.378
reducing the number of dimensions needed. But the&nbsp;
basic idea survives: regulate the infinite quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:37.378 --> 12:42.818
fluctuations, keep track of their finite quantum&nbsp;
contribution, and demand that the symmetries of&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:42.818 --> 12:48.978
the theory remain intact. Now for superstrings&nbsp;
that consistency condition gives ten spacetime&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:48.978 --> 12:55.218
dimensions rather than twenty-six. But the&nbsp;
same minus-one-twelfth-style regularization&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:55.218 --> 13:00.018
is still hiding inside the calculation.
So this brings us back to the original&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:00.018 --> 13:05.138
mathematical trick. In the physics examples,&nbsp;
regularization gives us a controlled way to&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:05.138 --> 13:10.498
handle an infinite mode sum, and renormalization&nbsp;
tells us which divergent parts are universal or&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:10.498 --> 13:17.298
unobservable and can be subtracted away. Zeta&nbsp;
regularization—the mathematical procedure that&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:17.298 --> 13:24.658
got us our 1+2+3..=-1/12 - is related to&nbsp;
this. But instead of introducing a cutoff,&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:24.658 --> 13:29.858
it uses analytic continuation to assign&nbsp;
a finite value to the divergent series.

13:29.858 --> 13:35.778
And, in fact, for the one-dimensional Casimir&nbsp;
example and the simplest bosonic-string&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:35.778 --> 13:42.338
calculation, we can literally use this as&nbsp;
the Riemann zeta function to regularize&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:42.338 --> 13:48.898
the same divergent sum. Minus one twelfth is not
what you get by adding all the positive integers.&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:49.538 --> 13:54.898
It's what can be left after the universal&nbsp;
infinity has been stripped away,&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:54.898 --> 14:02.258
and knowing this lets us tame the infinite&nbsp;
quantum fluctuations of empty spacetime.

13:54.898 --> 13:59.938
functionality. If you’re already running a&nbsp;
business or looking to start one, you can book&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:54.898 --> 14:02.512
a free consultation with an Odoo expert or start&nbsp;
a 15-day free trial, with no credit card required.
