WEBVTT

00:00.160 --> 00:06.080
Quantum mechanics is perhaps the most successful&nbsp;
theory in all of science. It predicts the behavior&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06.080 --> 00:11.920
of the invisible subatomic world with astonishing&nbsp;
precision. It allows us to explain everything from&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:11.920 --> 00:19.200
chemistry to stars and our quantum technology&nbsp;
underlies the digital age. The catch is that&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:19.200 --> 00:25.680
the reality that it describes is completely&nbsp;
insane. Particles are waves of possibility,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:25.680 --> 00:30.720
alternate realities that split and merge&nbsp;
between measurements. And absent measurement,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:30.720 --> 00:36.400
reality may not exist as we know it. A century&nbsp;
after the discovery of quantum mechanics,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:36.400 --> 00:42.560
we still don't know what this incredibly&nbsp;
powerful theory means. This longplay episode&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:42.560 --> 00:48.800
brings together the quantum journey that we've&nbsp;
been on for the past decade of spaceime. the&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:48.800 --> 01:02.240
foundational ideas, experiments, and even the&nbsp;
crazier speculations of quantum mechanics.

00:48.800 --> 01:02.240
foundational ideas, experiments, and even the&nbsp;
crazier speculations of quantum mechanics.

00:55.955 --> 00:59.635
Wouldn't it be nice to be everywhere at&nbsp;
once? According to quantum mechanics,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:59.635 --> 01:05.875
you are at least a little bit. Quantum mechanics&nbsp;
is a spectacularly weird theory. One of its&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:05.875 --> 01:11.715
basic tenets is that certain properties&nbsp;
of an object are fundamentally uncertain.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:11.715 --> 01:16.755
They don't hold well- definfined values but&nbsp;
instead must be described as a distribution&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:16.755 --> 01:24.355
of possible states of being. Each specific state&nbsp;
has a certain probability of being true when the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:24.355 --> 01:30.275
object is observed or more accurately until&nbsp;
a quantum object interacts with something.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:30.275 --> 01:36.675
All possible states are just as real as each&nbsp;
other. Although not necessarily equally likely,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:36.675 --> 01:42.755
there's a distribution of probabilities for&nbsp;
each of an object's quantum properties. That&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:42.755 --> 01:49.715
distribution and the way it changes over time is&nbsp;
coded in the object's wave function. The reduction&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:49.715 --> 01:56.995
of a fuzzy possibility space into a specific&nbsp;
measurable property is sometimes referred to&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:56.995 --> 02:02.595
as the collapse of the wave function. We'll&nbsp;
talk a lot more about this awesome weirdness&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:02.595 --> 02:09.235
in the future. For now, let's just look at the&nbsp;
strange consequences of quantum uncertainty in&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:09.235 --> 02:15.315
an object's location. This is one of the early&nbsp;
realizations in the development of quantum theory.&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:15.315 --> 02:22.195
French mathematician and physicist Louie de Bruyer&nbsp;
figured out that any material object is really a&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:22.195 --> 02:29.875
matter wave. It can be described as a wave packet&nbsp;
of position probability and that wave packet has&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:29.875 --> 02:37.955
a wavelength. This de Bruyer wavelength defines&nbsp;
how well determined an object position is. A large&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:37.955 --> 02:45.155
wavelength means a highly uncertain position. A&nbsp;
small wavelength means a well-defined position.&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:45.155 --> 02:51.955
That's true of subatomic particles and it's sort&nbsp;
of true of anything. Right now, I'm mostly right&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:51.955 --> 02:58.675
here, but there's also a smaller chance that&nbsp;
I'm here, here, or here. There's an infinite&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:58.675 --> 03:05.315
decimal chance that I'm on the moon. Observe me,&nbsp;
and you'll collapse my wave function and probably&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:05.315 --> 03:11.475
find me pretty much exactly where you expect&nbsp;
to. See, an object's debroy wavelength depends&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:11.475 --> 03:18.995
on its momentum. So, mass times velocity. Higher&nbsp;
momentum means a smaller wavelength. In fact, it's&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:18.995 --> 03:25.715
the minuscule plank constant divided by momentum.&nbsp;
Humans are made up of several tens of kilograms of&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:25.715 --> 03:30.755
thermally moving particles and have de Bruy&nbsp;
wavelengths a couple of orders of magnitude&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:30.755 --> 03:38.275
smaller than the plank length. You're everywhere&nbsp;
in the universe, but not very much. You're as&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:38.275 --> 03:45.955
right there as it's possible to be. But what about&nbsp;
something much smaller? say a tightly bound bundle&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:45.955 --> 03:52.835
with two protons and two neutrons that we call an&nbsp;
alpha particle. On its own, this would be a helium&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:52.835 --> 03:59.875
nucleus. But these bundles also exist as parts&nbsp;
of heavier atomic nuclei. There an alpha particle&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:59.875 --> 04:06.035
is snugly bound into the nucleus by the strong&nbsp;
nuclear force. We can imagine an alpha particle&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:06.035 --> 04:12.755
as being like a ball trapped in a steep valley&nbsp;
of potential energy. It can roll around inside,&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:12.755 --> 04:18.835
but unless it has a very large kinetic energy,&nbsp;
it will never roll over the edges. But quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:18.835 --> 04:25.795
objects aren't at all like balls. Their positions&nbsp;
are not well defined. As an alpha particle&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:25.795 --> 04:33.795
approaches the force barrier of the nucleus, its&nbsp;
wave packet is reflected backwards. Usually, see,&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:33.795 --> 04:40.275
that wave packet describes a range of possible&nbsp;
locations for the approaching particle. But that&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:40.275 --> 04:48.195
possibility space does not end suddenly at the&nbsp;
force barrier. Instead, it drops off quickly&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:48.195 --> 04:56.275
exponentially through the steep walls. However,&nbsp;
it never quite reaches zero. There remains a&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:56.275 --> 05:03.555
tiny tail of probability outside the nucleus&nbsp;
beyond the reach of the strong nuclear force.&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:04.115 --> 05:11.155
That means there's a very tiny chance that instead&nbsp;
of bouncing off the wall, the particle will at the&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:11.155 --> 05:19.715
last minute resolve its position in that unlikely&nbsp;
outside bit of its possibility space. That looks&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:19.715 --> 05:26.275
like the particle teleporting out of the nucleus.&nbsp;
This process is called quantum tunneling.&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:26.275 --> 05:31.315
When it's an alpha particle escaping a nucleus,&nbsp;
this is one of the most important mechanisms for&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:31.315 --> 05:38.515
radioactive decay. Quantum tunneling also goes in&nbsp;
the other direction. Protons, neutrons, electrons,&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:38.515 --> 05:44.835
and alpha particles can quantum tunnel into nuclei&nbsp;
in various types of fusion and particle capture&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:44.835 --> 05:52.835
phenomena. In fact, without quantum tunneling,&nbsp;
stars could not fuse hydrogen into heavier nuclei.&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:52.835 --> 05:59.555
A variety of modern electronics also rely on the&nbsp;
tunneling phenomenon, including the transistor.&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:59.555 --> 06:04.515
But how quickly does the alpha particle move&nbsp;
through this barrier? Well, as far as we know,&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:04.515 --> 06:12.435
it's instantaneous. That suggests a velocity&nbsp;
faster than light, which sounds problematic.&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:12.435 --> 06:18.035
It's actually extremely hard to test this&nbsp;
because we can't make clocks accurate enough&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:18.035 --> 06:23.955
to time such a ridiculously quick event. Here's&nbsp;
one way you might test this. Remember the LIGO&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:23.955 --> 06:28.595
interpherometer that discovered gravitational&nbsp;
waves? Laser beams are sent down paths at right&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:28.595 --> 06:34.915
angles and then brought back together. The photon&nbsp;
wave packets interact with each other and produce&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:34.915 --> 06:41.155
an interference pattern that is incredibly&nbsp;
sensitive to differences in path lengths. Well,&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:41.155 --> 06:45.795
that's a Michaelelsson interferometer,&nbsp;
but let's change the arrangement a bit.&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:45.795 --> 06:52.275
We want to send individual photons instead of&nbsp;
lasers. and we want to block one of the paths&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:52.275 --> 06:58.835
with a very thin reflective barrier like&nbsp;
this. In the absence of quantum tunneling,&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:58.835 --> 07:05.235
that barrier should reflect its photon 100% of&nbsp;
the time. But just like with the alpha particle,&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:05.235 --> 07:11.475
as the photon approaches the barrier, the wave&nbsp;
packet defining its possible location extends&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:11.475 --> 07:19.395
weekly beyond the barrier. About 99% of the time&nbsp;
the photon is reflected, but 1% of the time it&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:19.395 --> 07:25.715
will resolve itself beyond the barrier and it'll&nbsp;
continue on its path. If those rare tunneling&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:25.715 --> 07:30.995
photons really do travel instantaneously through&nbsp;
the width of the barrier, then they should arrive&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:30.995 --> 07:37.315
at the detector slightly ahead of the photon that&nbsp;
travels the unimpeded path. That will be apparent&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:37.315 --> 07:43.795
when their wave packets don't line up perfectly at&nbsp;
the other end. But for this to work, the original&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:43.795 --> 07:50.995
path lengths of the intererometer need to be very&nbsp;
precisely equal. To make that work, you need to&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:50.995 --> 07:59.155
use a second and perhaps even weirder feature of&nbsp;
quantum mechanics. Quantum entanglements. That is&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:59.155 --> 08:07.395
a huge topic for another video. It offers another&nbsp;
tantalizing hint at faster than light influences.&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:07.395 --> 08:13.075
For now, let me just say that in order to produce&nbsp;
these entangled states, the path length of the&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:13.075 --> 08:18.915
intererometer needs to be identical to very&nbsp;
high precision. Tune the path lengths until&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:18.915 --> 08:24.755
the weird effects of entanglement emerge, and&nbsp;
you know that they're equal. At that point,&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:24.755 --> 08:31.155
you can get an incredibly precise measurement of&nbsp;
any differences in photon travel time. A team of&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:31.155 --> 08:37.475
very clever physicists have successfully performed&nbsp;
this experiment. Reference link below. What did&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:37.475 --> 08:46.115
they find? The tunneling photon does arrive a&nbsp;
tiny bit earlier than its partner. It appears to&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:46.115 --> 08:54.915
teleport through the barrier and so travel faster&nbsp;
than light. Sweet. So scale up from photons to&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:54.915 --> 09:02.515
people and we have transporter beams, right? Well,&nbsp;
this apparent violation of relativity only occurs&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:02.515 --> 09:09.315
deep within the quantum realm. A particle resolves&nbsp;
its location anywhere within the vicinity of its&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:09.315 --> 09:18.035
de Bruy wavelength. That uncertainty in location&nbsp;
allows tunneling. But even without a barrier,&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:18.035 --> 09:25.075
this location fuzziness leads to uncertainty&nbsp;
in the arrival time of the photon. An unimpeded&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:25.075 --> 09:31.715
photon could arrive at the earlier time of the&nbsp;
tunneling photon because its wave packet includes&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:31.715 --> 09:37.715
that in its range of possible positions. When&nbsp;
you add the barrier, all you're really doing is&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:37.715 --> 09:44.515
reshaping the wave packet, selecting only the&nbsp;
possibility space of early arrival. This can&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:44.515 --> 09:50.195
look like an increase in the speed of light, but&nbsp;
only within the uncertainty range defined by the&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:50.195 --> 09:55.955
de Bruy wavelength. More accurately, it's within&nbsp;
the uncertainty range defined by the Heisenberg&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:55.955 --> 10:02.995
uncertainty principle, which is perhaps the deeper&nbsp;
principle from which the de bruy wavelength comes.&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:02.995 --> 10:09.795
This is something we'll also get back to in&nbsp;
detail. Any macroscopic object is subject to&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:09.795 --> 10:16.675
a very well-defined speed limit. But in the&nbsp;
quantum realm, Heisenberg uncertainty does&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:16.675 --> 10:22.915
seem to allow instantaneous motion and even&nbsp;
perhaps causality violation within quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:22.915 --> 10:31.395
limits. Stay tuned for the implications of this&nbsp;
on both quantum and cosmic scales of spaceime.

10:33.955 --> 10:38.755
The plank constant defines the size scale at&nbsp;
which the familiar physics of our macroscopic&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:38.755 --> 10:45.315
reality gives way to the weirdness of the quantum&nbsp;
world. You might not expect the quantum behavior&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:45.315 --> 10:52.755
of the microscopic to be observable on all scales&nbsp;
of the universe. But it is in fact you can see the&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:52.755 --> 10:59.555
effect of this quantum behavior and even measure&nbsp;
the plank constant just by observing the color of&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:59.555 --> 11:06.755
sunlight. Zeno's famous paradox tells us that it's&nbsp;
impossible to overtake a tortoise. Run as fast&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:06.755 --> 11:12.355
as you like. By the time you reach the tortoise's&nbsp;
initial position, it'll have moved forward. Reach&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:12.355 --> 11:17.475
that second position, it'll have moved forward&nbsp;
again. To overtake a tortoise, you need to&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:17.475 --> 11:23.635
travel to its previous position infinite times.&nbsp;
Each of those steps is shorter than the last,&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:23.635 --> 11:29.315
but there are still an infinite number of them.&nbsp;
There are a few problems with this paradox, but&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:29.315 --> 11:36.835
one is that it assumes that space is infinitely&nbsp;
divisible. This is not true. As your distance to&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:36.835 --> 11:44.115
the tortoise becomes unthinkably small, there&nbsp;
arises a quantum uncertainty in your location.&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:44.115 --> 11:50.195
Get close enough to it and this quantum blurriness&nbsp;
means it's impossible to say whether your location&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:50.195 --> 11:55.715
is really behind or in front of the tortoise. We&nbsp;
talked about this recently when we discussed the&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:55.715 --> 12:01.795
de bruy wavelength. This and more formally the&nbsp;
Heisenberg uncertainty principle describes the&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:01.795 --> 12:08.355
smallest distance for which an object's location&nbsp;
can be meaningfully defined. The tiny plank&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:08.355 --> 12:18.035
constant at 6.63x 10us 34 JW seconds sets the&nbsp;
scale of this quantum blurriness. So it also sort&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:18.035 --> 12:26.835
of defines a pixel scale to reality. In many ways,&nbsp;
it defines the divisibility of the quantum world.&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:26.835 --> 12:34.115
In fact, the plank constant appears in essentially&nbsp;
all equations that describe quantum phenomena. the&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:34.115 --> 12:40.115
Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the de bruy&nbsp;
wavelength but also the Schrodinger equation the&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:40.115 --> 12:46.035
energy levels of electron orbits and importantly&nbsp;
the relationship between the energy and frequency&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:46.035 --> 12:54.595
of a photon. It also sets the size of the plank&nbsp;
length which is hypothetically the length below&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:54.595 --> 13:01.235
which the concept of length loses meaning.&nbsp;
It may define the scale of quantum reality,&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:01.235 --> 13:06.915
but the influence of the plank constant can&nbsp;
be seen even on our scale. For example, along&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:06.915 --> 13:14.355
with the sun's temperature, it sets the color of&nbsp;
sunlight. If the plank constant were 25% smaller,&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:14.355 --> 13:20.995
the sun would be violet, all else being equal. In&nbsp;
fact, the mystery of why hot things glow the color&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:20.995 --> 13:27.235
that they do led us to discover the quantum&nbsp;
universe in the first place. Science fact.&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:27.235 --> 13:32.675
Everything in the universe glows with the&nbsp;
light of its own internal heat. Heat is&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:32.675 --> 13:38.355
just the energy in the random motion of particles&nbsp;
comprising an object. Accelerated charges produce&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:38.355 --> 13:45.475
electromagnetic radiation light. And so an object&nbsp;
made of jiggling charged particles like electrons&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:45.475 --> 13:52.995
and protons glows. The hotter an object is, the&nbsp;
faster its particles jiggle. And so the average&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:52.995 --> 14:00.515
frequency of the resulting particles of light of&nbsp;
photons increases with temperature. This average&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:00.515 --> 14:08.435
frequency defines the color that we see. The&nbsp;
sun is yellow because its 6,000 Kelvin surface&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:08.435 --> 14:15.235
produces more photons in the greeny yellow part of&nbsp;
the electromagnetic spectrum than anywhere else.&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:15.795 --> 14:23.475
The blue super giant star Ryel is 12,000 Kelvin&nbsp;
and so it pumps out lots of highfrequency blue&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:23.475 --> 14:32.515
light and even more ultraviolet. Your temperature&nbsp;
is around 310 Kelvin. So your heat glow is mostly&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:32.515 --> 14:39.235
in low frequency infrared photons. It was Sir&nbsp;
Isaac Newton who first analyzed this heat glow&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:39.235 --> 14:45.955
in the 1660s when he used a prism to split&nbsp;
sunlight into its component colors. But he&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:45.955 --> 14:51.475
didn't realize that the relative brightnesses&nbsp;
of those colors held the key to the quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:51.475 --> 14:58.595
world. By the late 1800s, the distribution of&nbsp;
brightnesses with frequency produced by hot&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:58.595 --> 15:05.315
objects had been mapped in careful experiments&nbsp;
that blacked out anything but the glow of heat.&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:05.315 --> 15:13.795
The resulting black body spectrum looks like a&nbsp;
lopsided bell curve. However, the deep physics&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:13.795 --> 15:18.915
behind this shape remained a mystery. The&nbsp;
key to unlocking the mystery lay in finding&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:18.915 --> 15:24.595
a mathematical description for the black body&nbsp;
spectrum. At the beginning of the 20th century,&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:24.595 --> 15:31.635
a couple more Brits, Lordley and Sir James Jeans,&nbsp;
attacked the problem with a relatively new idea&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:31.635 --> 15:38.435
called the equipartition theorem. It states that&nbsp;
an object's heat energy will end up jiggling all&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:38.435 --> 15:45.315
of its particles in all the ways that they can&nbsp;
be jiggled. In physics speak, at equilibrium,&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:45.315 --> 15:52.355
energy is evenly spread between all possible&nbsp;
energy states. This simple idea allowed our good&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:52.355 --> 15:57.955
Englishman to figure out the frequencies of the&nbsp;
photons produced by all of this thermal motion.&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:57.955 --> 16:05.075
The resulting jeans law described the black body&nbsp;
spectrum perfectly for low frequency infrared&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:05.075 --> 16:11.475
light. But for high frequencies like visible&nbsp;
and ultraviolet, it predicted brightnesses that&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:11.475 --> 16:18.755
were way too high. Worse, it predicted that the&nbsp;
intensity should eventually approach infinity as&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:18.755 --> 16:25.475
frequency increased. It paints the crazy picture&nbsp;
of a universe full of infinite extreme energy&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:25.475 --> 16:34.115
gamma radiation. This appears not to be the case.&nbsp;
This was called the ultraviolet catastrophe. It&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:34.115 --> 16:39.075
was catastrophic because it meant that something&nbsp;
was fundamentally wrong with the classical physics&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:39.075 --> 16:46.035
that went into the genans law. The problem turned&nbsp;
out to be that in classical physics everything&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:46.035 --> 16:52.595
can be infinitely divided. There's no smallest&nbsp;
anything. The genes calculation allows particles&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:52.595 --> 17:00.035
to vibrate with any amount of energy all the way&nbsp;
down to infinite decimally tiny wiggles. When they&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:00.035 --> 17:06.995
tried to mathematically distribute heat energy to&nbsp;
equipartition it across possible energy states,&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:06.995 --> 17:13.875
way too much energy got packed into the countless&nbsp;
very tiny energy states at high frequencies.&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:13.875 --> 17:19.875
Mathematically, Raian genes were chasing&nbsp;
Zeno's tortoise, infinitely dividing the&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:19.875 --> 17:26.835
smallest remaining energy states and so never ever&nbsp;
finding an end to them. German physicist Max Carl&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:26.835 --> 17:32.835
Ernst Ludwig plank resolved the catastrophe&nbsp;
almost by accident. While searching for a new&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:32.835 --> 17:39.395
mathematical approach to deriving the black body&nbsp;
spectrum, he needed some sort of math trick to&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:39.395 --> 17:47.075
count those supposedly infinite energy states.&nbsp;
In what he described as a moment of desperation,&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:47.075 --> 17:53.795
he tried something pretty silly. He decided that&nbsp;
those particles could only vibrate with energies&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:53.795 --> 18:01.475
that were a multiple of some minimum energy. He&nbsp;
quantized the energy states. He set this minimum&nbsp;&nbsp;

18:01.475 --> 18:07.795
energy to be the frequency of a particle's&nbsp;
vibration times a very very small number,&nbsp;&nbsp;

18:07.795 --> 18:14.915
a number that had yet to be measured. That number&nbsp;
became the plank constant. It was a move similar&nbsp;&nbsp;

18:14.915 --> 18:21.715
to smooshing your hands on the keyboard when your&nbsp;
computer freezes. But it worked. It allowed plank&nbsp;&nbsp;

18:21.715 --> 18:28.995
to equipartition energy in a way that solved the&nbsp;
ultraviolet catastrophe. Why? Because it limited&nbsp;&nbsp;

18:28.995 --> 18:35.075
how much energy those high frequency vibrations&nbsp;
could hold. Plank's new equation described the&nbsp;&nbsp;

18:35.075 --> 18:42.915
shape of the black body spectrum exactly across&nbsp;
all frequencies of light. It became plank's law.&nbsp;&nbsp;

18:42.915 --> 18:48.835
Now, Max Planck didn't originally think that&nbsp;
these quantized energy levels were real. It&nbsp;&nbsp;

18:48.835 --> 18:54.915
was supposed to be a math trick. He expected&nbsp;
his new constant to turn out to be zero, which&nbsp;&nbsp;

18:54.915 --> 19:03.395
would mean no interval between energy states, no&nbsp;
quantization, no minimum energy. In that case,&nbsp;&nbsp;

19:03.395 --> 19:10.195
the plank constant would have canceled out in&nbsp;
the final equation, but it didn't. The plank&nbsp;&nbsp;

19:10.195 --> 19:17.795
constant is firmly entrenched in the plank black&nbsp;
body law. Energy quantization is real. Now the&nbsp;&nbsp;

19:17.795 --> 19:22.995
actual value of the plank constant still had&nbsp;
to be measured. But given a mathematical form&nbsp;&nbsp;

19:22.995 --> 19:29.475
for the black body spectrum, it was possible to do&nbsp;
this just by varying the constant until the plank&nbsp;&nbsp;

19:29.475 --> 19:35.795
law matched the observed spectrum. But once you&nbsp;
know the plank law and an object's temperature,&nbsp;&nbsp;

19:35.795 --> 19:40.755
you can calculate the plank constant just by&nbsp;
finding the brightest part of an object's heat&nbsp;&nbsp;

19:40.755 --> 19:47.955
glow. For example, by observing the color of the&nbsp;
sun. As usual, it took Albert Einstein to fully&nbsp;&nbsp;

19:47.955 --> 19:55.155
understand the physics behind Planck's strange&nbsp;
quantized vibrations. Einstein realized that it's&nbsp;&nbsp;

19:55.155 --> 20:02.275
actually light that is quantized. Those little&nbsp;
vibrating particles do have quantized energies,&nbsp;&nbsp;

20:02.275 --> 20:08.835
but it's because they can only gain or lose energy&nbsp;
by absorbing or emitting one particle of light at&nbsp;&nbsp;

20:08.835 --> 20:17.475
a time. And that light comes in indivisible energy&nbsp;
packets. Plank's discovery was the clue Einstein&nbsp;&nbsp;

20:17.475 --> 20:24.915
needed to hypothesize the existence of the photon.&nbsp;
Part wave, part particle, carrying a quantum of&nbsp;&nbsp;

20:24.915 --> 20:32.275
energy equal to the now familiar frequency of&nbsp;
the wave times the plank constant. Einstein&nbsp;&nbsp;

20:32.275 --> 20:38.995
proved this through the photoelectric effect.&nbsp;
It got him the 1921 Nobel Prize in physics.&nbsp;&nbsp;

20:38.995 --> 20:46.355
Shortly following Planck's Nobel of 1918, these&nbsp;
discoveries sparked a frenzy of sciencing that&nbsp;&nbsp;

20:46.355 --> 20:51.875
led to the quantum revolution of the 1920s. And&nbsp;
that little number that Maxplank came up with in&nbsp;&nbsp;

20:51.875 --> 20:58.435
his moment of desperation, the plank constant,&nbsp;
remains at the heart of all things quantum. But&nbsp;&nbsp;

20:58.435 --> 21:03.955
not just quantum. By defining the shape of the&nbsp;
black body spectrum, the plank constant can be&nbsp;&nbsp;

21:03.955 --> 21:08.675
red in the color of the sun and the stars in&nbsp;
the brightness of the different colors of the&nbsp;&nbsp;

21:08.675 --> 21:15.955
rainbow and combined with a small handful of&nbsp;
other fundamental constants. It governs the&nbsp;&nbsp;

21:15.955 --> 21:24.355
behavior of everything in this spaceime. One of&nbsp;
the strangest experimental results ever observed&nbsp;&nbsp;

21:24.355 --> 21:29.875
has got to be that of the single particle double&nbsp;
slit experiment. It's one of the most stunning&nbsp;&nbsp;

21:29.875 --> 21:35.315
illustrations of how the quantum world is very&nbsp;
very different from the large scale world of&nbsp;&nbsp;

21:35.315 --> 21:42.515
our physical intuition. In fact, it hints that the&nbsp;
fundamental nature of reality may not be physical&nbsp;&nbsp;

21:42.515 --> 21:48.115
at all, at least in any sense that we're familiar&nbsp;
with. Let's start with the familiar. In fact,&nbsp;&nbsp;

21:48.115 --> 21:54.275
let's start with a rubber ducky. It bobs up and&nbsp;
down in a pool, causing periodic ripples to spread&nbsp;&nbsp;

21:54.275 --> 22:01.795
out. Some distance away, those waves encounter a&nbsp;
barrier with two gaps cut in it. Most of the wave&nbsp;&nbsp;

22:01.795 --> 22:07.555
is blocked, but ripples pass through the gaps.&nbsp;
When the new ripples start to overlap each other,&nbsp;&nbsp;

22:07.555 --> 22:13.555
they produce this really cool pattern. It's called&nbsp;
an interference pattern. It's due to the fact that&nbsp;&nbsp;

22:13.555 --> 22:19.555
in some places the peak of the ripple from one&nbsp;
gap stacks on top of the peak from the other gap,&nbsp;&nbsp;

22:19.555 --> 22:26.355
making a more extreme peak. You also get more&nbsp;
extreme dips when two troughs overlap. We call&nbsp;&nbsp;

22:26.355 --> 22:33.315
this constructive interference. But when the peak&nbsp;
from one wave encounters the trough from another,&nbsp;&nbsp;

22:33.315 --> 22:39.715
they cancel out, leaving nothing. Destructive&nbsp;
interference. So we have these alternating&nbsp;&nbsp;

22:39.715 --> 22:47.395
tracks of wavy and flat water. Any type of wave&nbsp;
should make an interference pattern like this.&nbsp;&nbsp;

22:47.395 --> 22:53.875
for example, water waves and sound waves, but&nbsp;
also light waves. This double slit interference&nbsp;&nbsp;

22:53.875 --> 23:00.835
of light was first observed by Thomas Young back&nbsp;
in 1801. A source of light passing through two&nbsp;&nbsp;

23:00.835 --> 23:06.835
very thin slits produces bands of light&nbsp;
and dark stripes, alternating regions of&nbsp;&nbsp;

23:06.835 --> 23:12.995
constructive and destructive interference on a&nbsp;
screen. Of course, we now know that light is a&nbsp;&nbsp;

23:12.995 --> 23:18.675
wave in the electromagnetic field thanks to the&nbsp;
work of James Clark Maxwell a century later. So,&nbsp;&nbsp;

23:18.675 --> 23:23.955
it makes perfect sense that it should produce&nbsp;
an interference pattern, right? But wait,&nbsp;&nbsp;

23:23.955 --> 23:29.635
we also know that light comes in indivisible&nbsp;
little bundles of electromagnetic energy called&nbsp;&nbsp;

23:29.635 --> 23:36.195
photons. Einstein demonstrated this through the&nbsp;
photoelectric effect, but his clue came from the&nbsp;&nbsp;

23:36.195 --> 23:42.115
quantized energy levels of Maxplank's black body&nbsp;
radiation law. Check out our episode on this for&nbsp;&nbsp;

23:42.115 --> 23:48.355
the details. Okay, so each photon is a little&nbsp;
bundle of waves, waves of electromagnetic field,&nbsp;&nbsp;

23:48.355 --> 23:54.195
and each bundle can't be broken into smaller&nbsp;
parts. That means that each photon should have&nbsp;&nbsp;

23:54.195 --> 24:00.675
to decide whether it's going to go through one&nbsp;
slit or the other. It can't split in half and then&nbsp;&nbsp;

24:00.675 --> 24:07.715
recombine on the other side. That shouldn't be a&nbsp;
problem as long as you have at least two photons.&nbsp;&nbsp;

24:07.715 --> 24:12.915
One photon passes through each slit and then the&nbsp;
two photons interact with each other on the other&nbsp;&nbsp;

24:12.915 --> 24:18.595
side and produce our interference pattern. But&nbsp;
here we get to one of the craziest experimental&nbsp;&nbsp;

24:18.595 --> 24:25.795
results in all of physics. The interference&nbsp;
pattern is seen even if you fire those photons one&nbsp;&nbsp;

24:25.795 --> 24:32.115
at a time. Well, let me back up a bit. The first&nbsp;
photon is detected as having arrived at a very&nbsp;&nbsp;

24:32.115 --> 24:38.675
particular location on the screen. The second,&nbsp;
third, and fourth photons also, they deliver their&nbsp;&nbsp;

24:38.675 --> 24:45.875
energy at a single spot. And so, they appear to be&nbsp;
acting like particles of well-determined position.&nbsp;&nbsp;

24:45.875 --> 24:52.275
But check it out. If you keep firing those&nbsp;
single photons, you start to see our interference&nbsp;&nbsp;

24:52.275 --> 24:59.635
pattern emerge once again. By the way, Veritassium&nbsp;
actually conducts this experiment in his excellent&nbsp;&nbsp;

24:59.635 --> 25:07.235
series on the double slit experiment. Really&nbsp;
worth a look. This is so bizarre. This pattern has&nbsp;&nbsp;

25:07.235 --> 25:12.675
nothing to do with how each photon's energy gets&nbsp;
spread out. As was the case with the water wave,&nbsp;&nbsp;

25:12.675 --> 25:18.995
each photon dumps all of its energy at a single&nbsp;
point. No, the pattern emerges in the distribution&nbsp;&nbsp;

25:18.995 --> 25:27.395
of final positions of many completely unrelated&nbsp;
photons. How can that be? Each photon has no idea&nbsp;&nbsp;

25:27.395 --> 25:33.715
where previous photons landed or where future&nbsp;
photons will land. Yet, each photon reaches&nbsp;&nbsp;

25:33.715 --> 25:39.715
the screen knowing which regions are the most&nbsp;
likely landing spots and which are the least&nbsp;&nbsp;

25:39.715 --> 25:47.315
likely. It knows the interference pattern of a&nbsp;
pure wave that passed through both slits equally,&nbsp;&nbsp;

25:47.315 --> 25:52.435
and it chooses its landing point based on that.&nbsp;
It turns out that the photon isn't the only&nbsp;&nbsp;

25:52.435 --> 25:57.715
thing that does this. Shoot a single electron&nbsp;
through a pair of slits and it'll also appear&nbsp;&nbsp;

25:57.715 --> 26:02.755
to land at a single spot on the screen. But&nbsp;
fire many electrons and they slowly build up&nbsp;&nbsp;

26:02.755 --> 26:09.795
the same sort of interference pattern. This crazy&nbsp;
effect has even been observed with whole atoms,&nbsp;&nbsp;

26:09.795 --> 26:17.075
even whole molecules. Buckminister ferine.&nbsp;
Bucky balls are gigantic spherical molecules of&nbsp;&nbsp;

26:17.075 --> 26:23.795
60 carbon atoms and have been observed to produce&nbsp;
double slit interference under special conditions.&nbsp;&nbsp;

26:23.795 --> 26:30.995
We have to conclude that each individual photon&nbsp;
electron or baky ball travels through both slits&nbsp;&nbsp;

26:30.995 --> 26:39.315
as some sort of wave. That wave then interacts&nbsp;
with itself to produce an interference pattern.&nbsp;&nbsp;

26:39.315 --> 26:44.995
except that here the peaks of that pattern&nbsp;
are regions where there's more chance that the&nbsp;&nbsp;

26:44.995 --> 26:51.875
particle will find itself. It looks like a wave&nbsp;
of possible undefined positions that at some point&nbsp;&nbsp;

26:51.875 --> 26:58.515
for some reason resolves itself into a single&nbsp;
certain position. We also saw this winess in&nbsp;&nbsp;

26:58.515 --> 27:04.675
position when we talked about quantum tunneling.&nbsp;
In fact, several quantum properties like momentum,&nbsp;&nbsp;

27:04.675 --> 27:11.235
energy, and spin all display similar winess in&nbsp;
different situations. We call the mathematical&nbsp;&nbsp;

27:11.235 --> 27:16.755
description of this wavelike distribution&nbsp;
of properties a wave function, describing&nbsp;&nbsp;

27:16.755 --> 27:23.075
the behavior of the wave function is the heart of&nbsp;
quantum mechanics. But what does the wave function&nbsp;&nbsp;

27:23.075 --> 27:29.635
represent? What are these waves of or waves in?&nbsp;
Let's start with what we do know about the double&nbsp;&nbsp;

27:29.635 --> 27:36.595
slit result. We know where the particle is at&nbsp;
both ends. It starts its journey wherever we put&nbsp;&nbsp;

27:36.595 --> 27:44.515
the laser or electron gun or bucky ball trebushe&nbsp;
and it releases its energy at a well- definfined&nbsp;&nbsp;

27:44.515 --> 27:52.195
spot on the screen. So the particle seems to be&nbsp;
more particle like at either end but wavelike&nbsp;&nbsp;

27:52.195 --> 27:59.955
in between. That wave holds the information about&nbsp;
all the possible final positions of the particle,&nbsp;&nbsp;

27:59.955 --> 28:06.995
but also about its possible positions at every&nbsp;
stage in the journey. In fact, the wave must&nbsp;&nbsp;

28:06.995 --> 28:16.195
map out all possible paths that the particle could&nbsp;
take. We have this family of could be trajectories&nbsp;&nbsp;

28:16.195 --> 28:22.755
from start to finish. And for some reason when&nbsp;
the wave reaches the screen it chooses a final&nbsp;&nbsp;

28:22.755 --> 28:30.355
location that implies choosing from these possible&nbsp;
paths. So what causes this transition between a&nbsp;&nbsp;

28:30.355 --> 28:36.835
wave of many possibilities and a well- definfined&nbsp;
thing at a particular spot within that mysterious&nbsp;&nbsp;

28:36.835 --> 28:43.715
span between the creation and the detection.&nbsp;
Is the particle anything more than a space of&nbsp;&nbsp;

28:43.715 --> 28:49.475
possibility? Okay, we're adding more questions&nbsp;
than we're answering. We still didn't figure out&nbsp;&nbsp;

28:49.475 --> 28:56.355
what the wave is made of. In fact, the answers&nbsp;
aren't known, but the various interpretations&nbsp;&nbsp;

28:56.355 --> 29:03.395
of quantum mechanics do try. Let's talk about the&nbsp;
view favored by Verer Heisenberg and Neils Boore,&nbsp;&nbsp;

29:03.395 --> 29:09.635
who pioneered quantum mechanics at the University&nbsp;
of Copenhagen in the 1920s. The Copenhagen&nbsp;&nbsp;

29:09.635 --> 29:16.595
interpretation says that the wave function doesn't&nbsp;
have a physical nature. Instead, it's comprised&nbsp;&nbsp;

29:16.595 --> 29:23.955
of pure possibility. It suggests that a particle&nbsp;
traversing the double slit experiment exists only&nbsp;&nbsp;

29:23.955 --> 29:31.075
as a wave of possible locations that ultimately&nbsp;
encompasses all possible paths. It's only when the&nbsp;&nbsp;

29:31.075 --> 29:37.555
particle is detected that a location and the path&nbsp;
it took to get there are decided. The Copenhagen&nbsp;&nbsp;

29:37.555 --> 29:44.355
interpretation calls this transition from a&nbsp;
possibility space to a defined set of properties&nbsp;&nbsp;

29:44.355 --> 29:51.475
the collapse of the wave function. It tells us&nbsp;
that prior to the collapse, it's meaningless to&nbsp;&nbsp;

29:51.475 --> 29:57.475
try to define a particle's properties. It's almost&nbsp;
like the universe is allowing all possibilities&nbsp;&nbsp;

29:57.475 --> 30:04.515
to exist simultaneously, but holds off choosing&nbsp;
which actually happened until the last instant.&nbsp;&nbsp;

30:04.515 --> 30:10.595
weirder. Those different possible paths, those&nbsp;
different possible realities interact with each&nbsp;&nbsp;

30:10.595 --> 30:16.835
other. That interaction increases the chance that&nbsp;
some paths become real and decreases the chance of&nbsp;&nbsp;

30:16.835 --> 30:22.675
others. There's an interaction between possible&nbsp;
realities that is seen in the distribution of&nbsp;&nbsp;

30:22.675 --> 30:29.395
final positions in the interference pattern. That&nbsp;
pattern is real even though the vast majority of&nbsp;&nbsp;

30:29.395 --> 30:37.235
paths involved in producing the interference never&nbsp;
attain reality. In the Copenhagen interpretation,&nbsp;&nbsp;

30:37.235 --> 30:43.635
that final choice of the experiment of the&nbsp;
universe is fundamentally random within the&nbsp;&nbsp;

30:43.635 --> 30:49.235
constraints of the final wave function. The theory&nbsp;
of quantum mechanics produces stunningly accurate&nbsp;&nbsp;

30:49.235 --> 30:55.475
predictions of reality and it's completely&nbsp;
consistent with the Copenhagen interpretation.&nbsp;&nbsp;

30:55.475 --> 31:01.235
But this is not the only interpretation that&nbsp;
works. There are interpretations that give the&nbsp;&nbsp;

31:01.235 --> 31:08.355
wave function a physical reality. Remember, we&nbsp;
know that light is a wave in the electromagnetic&nbsp;&nbsp;

31:08.355 --> 31:14.675
field. And quantum field theory tells us that&nbsp;
all fundamental particles are waves in their&nbsp;&nbsp;

31:14.675 --> 31:22.515
own fields. This may give us a more physical&nbsp;
medium that drives these waves of possibility.&nbsp;&nbsp;

31:22.515 --> 31:27.635
And if you thought the Copenhagen interpretation&nbsp;
was freaky, wait till we get to the many worlds&nbsp;&nbsp;

31:27.635 --> 31:36.115
interpretation, which we will right here on&nbsp;
Spacetime. Can reality be adjusted after events&nbsp;&nbsp;

31:36.115 --> 31:42.355
have occurred? That's the unsettling implication&nbsp;
of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment.&nbsp;&nbsp;

31:42.355 --> 31:48.675
We recently talked about the weird results of the&nbsp;
single particle double slit experiment. They imply&nbsp;&nbsp;

31:48.675 --> 31:56.115
some startling things about the nature of reality.&nbsp;
Today I want to talk about an additional possibly&nbsp;&nbsp;

31:56.115 --> 32:02.435
even stranger version of this experiment whose&nbsp;
results force us to reconsider the nature of&nbsp;&nbsp;

32:02.435 --> 32:07.875
causality itself. Now this episode isn't going&nbsp;
to make a lot of sense unless you've seen the&nbsp;&nbsp;

32:07.875 --> 32:15.075
first one. So go ahead and watch it if you haven't&nbsp;
already. I'll wait right here. Okay. So the single&nbsp;&nbsp;

32:15.075 --> 32:21.395
particle double slit experiment suggests that&nbsp;
things may not exist as well- definfined even real&nbsp;&nbsp;

32:21.395 --> 32:28.195
particles in that strange interim between creation&nbsp;
and detection. There's a fuzzy space in which we&nbsp;&nbsp;

32:28.195 --> 32:34.275
don't know the particle's location or path. The&nbsp;
Copenhagen interpretation would tell us that in&nbsp;&nbsp;

32:34.275 --> 32:42.595
this space a particle is only its wave function,&nbsp;
a distribution of possible properties. It's a&nbsp;&nbsp;

32:42.595 --> 32:49.555
probability wave that does all the usual wavelike&nbsp;
stuff like making interference patterns until&nbsp;&nbsp;

32:49.555 --> 32:55.635
something happens to collapse it. At that point,&nbsp;
the Copenhagen interpretation tells us that a&nbsp;&nbsp;

32:55.635 --> 33:03.315
true transition happens between wave and particle.&nbsp;
But is that right? And if so, what really causes&nbsp;&nbsp;

33:03.315 --> 33:10.915
this transition? Does observation of the particles&nbsp;
location force the universe into settling down and&nbsp;&nbsp;

33:10.915 --> 33:17.315
deciding which particular reality we happen to be&nbsp;
in? To head off any wild metaphysical giddiness,&nbsp;&nbsp;

33:17.315 --> 33:22.915
I want to say right now that there's absolutely no&nbsp;
reason to believe that observation by a physicist&nbsp;&nbsp;

33:22.915 --> 33:29.155
is better at collapsing wave functions than&nbsp;
observation by an electronic detector or a&nbsp;&nbsp;

33:29.155 --> 33:34.355
house plant for that matter. We'll talk about&nbsp;
what observation really means at a later point,&nbsp;&nbsp;

33:34.355 --> 33:39.155
but it's still pretty interesting to see what&nbsp;
happens if we try to observe the wave function&nbsp;&nbsp;

33:39.155 --> 33:45.155
at different points in the double slit experiment.&nbsp;
The great mystery of the experiment is that very&nbsp;&nbsp;

33:45.155 --> 33:52.435
particle-like things appear to traverse both slits&nbsp;
simultaneously, like you might expect of a wave.&nbsp;&nbsp;

33:52.435 --> 33:59.075
Physicists love a good mystery and so have tried&nbsp;
very very hard to peak to see which slit these&nbsp;&nbsp;

33:59.075 --> 34:04.915
particles actually travel through before they&nbsp;
produce the famous interference pattern. Turns&nbsp;&nbsp;

34:04.915 --> 34:11.235
out the universe is on to us. Any experiment that&nbsp;
determines unambiguously which slit the particle&nbsp;&nbsp;

34:11.235 --> 34:18.755
traverses destroys the interference pattern.&nbsp;
Instead, particles land in simple clumps,&nbsp;&nbsp;

34:18.755 --> 34:24.755
one for each slit, as though they were traveling&nbsp;
as simple particles the whole time. This is even&nbsp;&nbsp;

34:24.755 --> 34:31.315
true if you place detectors on the far side of the&nbsp;
slits after the wave particle thing should have&nbsp;&nbsp;

34:31.315 --> 34:37.395
already been interfering with itself. It's like&nbsp;
the wave function is collapsing retroactively,&nbsp;&nbsp;

34:37.395 --> 34:42.035
as if the universe is saying, "Okay, guys, the&nbsp;
human figured out which way you went. No more&nbsp;&nbsp;

34:42.035 --> 34:47.155
funny stuff. better pretend like you are particles&nbsp;
that whole time. But there's a huge problem with&nbsp;&nbsp;

34:47.155 --> 34:53.395
this interpretation. It's impossible to make&nbsp;
these measurements without messing up the wave.&nbsp;&nbsp;

34:53.395 --> 34:59.315
The interference pattern happens because the waves&nbsp;
emerging from each slit are what we call coherent,&nbsp;&nbsp;

34:59.315 --> 35:02.755
which is a fancy way of saying that the&nbsp;
relationship between the waveforms emerging&nbsp;&nbsp;

35:02.755 --> 35:09.875
from the two slits. So the locations of peaks and&nbsp;
valleys is predictable and stays consistent as the&nbsp;&nbsp;

35:09.875 --> 35:16.275
waves move forward. This coherence is what allows&nbsp;
the waves to produce the interference pattern in&nbsp;&nbsp;

35:16.275 --> 35:21.955
the first place. But when you place some device&nbsp;
in the path of either wave, you mess with this&nbsp;&nbsp;

35:21.955 --> 35:28.275
coherence and so affect the pattern that reaches&nbsp;
the screen. By the way, the double slit experiment&nbsp;&nbsp;

35:28.275 --> 35:34.595
where you try to determine which slit is traversed&nbsp;
is called a which way experiment. And if the test&nbsp;&nbsp;

35:34.595 --> 35:41.475
is done on the far side of the slits, it's called&nbsp;
a delayed choice experiment. Physicists hate being&nbsp;&nbsp;

35:41.475 --> 35:46.915
outsmarted by the universe. So, they've come up&nbsp;
with clever ways to measure which way the particle&nbsp;&nbsp;

35:46.915 --> 35:53.235
traveled while still preserving coherence. I'm&nbsp;
going to talk about the most famous performed in&nbsp;&nbsp;

35:53.235 --> 36:00.595
1999. This experiment made use of a very special&nbsp;
type of crystal that absorbs an incoming photon&nbsp;&nbsp;

36:00.595 --> 36:07.155
and creates two new photons, each with half&nbsp;
the energy of the original. These new photons&nbsp;&nbsp;

36:07.155 --> 36:13.635
are twins of each other. In fact, they're an&nbsp;
entangled pair. So, fundamentally connected in&nbsp;&nbsp;

36:13.635 --> 36:19.555
strange ways that we'll come back to. So, place&nbsp;
this crystal in front of the double slit to make&nbsp;&nbsp;

36:19.555 --> 36:27.075
coherent entangle pairs of any photons passing&nbsp;
through. Send one of each pair off to the screen&nbsp;&nbsp;

36:27.075 --> 36:32.675
to produce our interference pattern and use the&nbsp;
other to figure out which slit the original photon&nbsp;&nbsp;

36:32.675 --> 36:40.035
passed through. Let's focus on detectors A and B.&nbsp;
Here, detector A lights up if the original photon&nbsp;&nbsp;

36:40.035 --> 36:45.635
passed through slit A and detector B lights up&nbsp;
for slit B. If we run this for a bunch of photons,&nbsp;&nbsp;

36:45.635 --> 36:53.715
we see that whenever detectors A or B light up, we&nbsp;
get a simple pile of photons here at the screen.&nbsp;&nbsp;

36:53.715 --> 36:58.755
No interference pattern at all. It's as though&nbsp;
any knowledge of which way the original photon&nbsp;&nbsp;

36:58.755 --> 37:05.555
traveled stops it from acting like a wave during&nbsp;
its passage through the slits. and crazier. This&nbsp;&nbsp;

37:05.555 --> 37:12.595
experiment was set up so that photons reach&nbsp;
A or B after their twins reach the screen. So&nbsp;&nbsp;

37:12.595 --> 37:17.475
a photon lands on the screen according to the&nbsp;
pattern defined by its wave function and then&nbsp;&nbsp;

37:17.475 --> 37:24.355
later its entangled partner reaches detector A&nbsp;
or B and somehow retroactively influences the&nbsp;&nbsp;

37:24.355 --> 37:29.395
previous landing position. It's like the second&nbsp;
photon is saying, "Whoa, whoa, whoa. Someone&nbsp;&nbsp;

37:29.395 --> 37:35.395
figured out which slit I came through. You better&nbsp;
look like you came through that one, too. This is&nbsp;&nbsp;

37:35.395 --> 37:41.315
amazing. And given that we only interact with one&nbsp;
of the entangled pair, surely that means we aren't&nbsp;&nbsp;

37:41.315 --> 37:46.995
messing with the other. So, we aren't ruining the&nbsp;
interference pattern with decoherence. Could it&nbsp;&nbsp;

37:46.995 --> 37:55.235
get any weirder? This is quantum mechanics. So,&nbsp;
yeah, this extra stuff is the quantum eraser. Its&nbsp;&nbsp;

37:55.235 --> 38:02.515
job is to destroy any information about the path&nbsp;
of the photons. These devices are beam splitters,&nbsp;&nbsp;

38:02.515 --> 38:08.675
just half silvered mirrors. They work by allowing&nbsp;
50% of the photons through while reflecting the&nbsp;&nbsp;

38:08.675 --> 38:15.715
other 50%. Now you have a new possible outcome.&nbsp;
Instead of being reflected to detectors A or B,&nbsp;&nbsp;

38:15.715 --> 38:21.715
half of the photons end up in detectors C&nbsp;
or D. But this clever arrangement ensures&nbsp;&nbsp;

38:21.715 --> 38:29.875
that if C or D light up, we have no idea which&nbsp;
slit that photon came from. If we only look at&nbsp;&nbsp;

38:29.875 --> 38:38.035
the photons whose twins end up at detector C or&nbsp;
D, we do see an interference pattern. It looks&nbsp;&nbsp;

38:38.035 --> 38:44.275
like the simple act of scrambling the which way&nbsp;
information retroactively sends the message, okay,&nbsp;&nbsp;

38:44.275 --> 38:49.555
chill. The observer lost the info of which slit&nbsp;
we went through. It's safe to have gone through&nbsp;&nbsp;

38:49.555 --> 38:56.915
both again. Are we forced to double down on the&nbsp;
interpretation that observation of the path causes&nbsp;&nbsp;

38:56.915 --> 39:02.595
the collapse of the wave function and that the&nbsp;
wave function can collapse all the way back to&nbsp;&nbsp;

39:02.595 --> 39:09.075
wherever our new knowledge extends to in the&nbsp;
past some sort of retroactive reality cascade?&nbsp;&nbsp;

39:09.075 --> 39:15.395
This is a pretty wild story. For that reason, it&nbsp;
makes sense to be cautious even of the Copenhagen&nbsp;&nbsp;

39:15.395 --> 39:20.595
interpretation. Part of the appeal of the&nbsp;
Copenhagen interpretation is that it avoids any&nbsp;&nbsp;

39:20.595 --> 39:27.395
physical interaction that moves faster than light.&nbsp;
See, when a spread out wave function resolves&nbsp;&nbsp;

39:27.395 --> 39:34.755
itself into a set of known properties, say the&nbsp;
location of a particle on the double slit screen,&nbsp;&nbsp;

39:34.755 --> 39:40.355
somehow the entire wave function knows to&nbsp;
do this to collapse at the same instant.&nbsp;&nbsp;

39:40.915 --> 39:46.275
But if these wave functions aren't physical,&nbsp;
as the Copenhagen interpretation would tell us,&nbsp;&nbsp;

39:46.275 --> 39:52.195
then there's no real instantaneous physical&nbsp;
interaction. By contrast, a physical&nbsp;&nbsp;

39:52.195 --> 39:58.835
interpretation of the wave function like the de&nbsp;
Bruy bone pilot wave theory requires an underlying&nbsp;&nbsp;

39:58.835 --> 40:05.075
physicality, a set of defined properties that&nbsp;
evolves with the wave function, so-called&nbsp;&nbsp;

40:05.075 --> 40:10.595
hidden variables. That's a bit uncomfortable&nbsp;
because to explain experimental results,&nbsp;&nbsp;

40:10.595 --> 40:16.835
those physical properties need to act and change&nbsp;
instantly at any distance. They need to have what&nbsp;&nbsp;

40:16.835 --> 40:23.635
we call non-locality. Now the delayed choice&nbsp;
quantum eraser double slit experiment doesn't&nbsp;&nbsp;

40:23.635 --> 40:29.715
tell us whether the wave function is physical or&nbsp;
not but it tells us that the Copenhagen or any&nbsp;&nbsp;

40:29.715 --> 40:35.955
other metaphysical interpretation of the wave&nbsp;
function is no less well crazy sounding than a&nbsp;&nbsp;

40:35.955 --> 40:41.875
physical interpretation. In fact the solution&nbsp;
may lie in this fascinating phenomenon of&nbsp;&nbsp;

40:41.875 --> 40:48.355
quantum entanglement. As we'll see in the future,&nbsp;
entangled particles really are able to influence&nbsp;&nbsp;

40:48.355 --> 40:55.795
each other instantaneously. And we'll see that&nbsp;
their non-locality doesn't violate causality.&nbsp;&nbsp;

40:55.795 --> 41:03.235
So perhaps they can even affect coherence and&nbsp;
decoherence retroactively and physically without&nbsp;&nbsp;

41:03.235 --> 41:10.035
making a causal mess. Perhaps this thing we call&nbsp;
observation is just entanglement between the&nbsp;&nbsp;

41:10.035 --> 41:17.955
observer and the experiment. Perhaps the evolving&nbsp;
tapestry of entanglement in all its impossible&nbsp;&nbsp;

41:17.955 --> 41:26.595
complexity is what really defines reality in&nbsp;
this spaceime. The quantum eraser experiment&nbsp;&nbsp;

41:26.595 --> 41:32.995
tantalizes us with the apparent instantaneous flow&nbsp;
of information between entangled photon pairs.&nbsp;&nbsp;

41:32.995 --> 41:39.795
In fact, the delayed choice quantum eraser seems&nbsp;
to show that information can travel backwards in&nbsp;&nbsp;

41:39.795 --> 41:46.995
time. For today's challenge question, I'm going to&nbsp;
propose a way to use it to create a timetraveling&nbsp;&nbsp;

41:46.995 --> 41:54.115
communication device and use it to cheat on the&nbsp;
lottery. I want your honest opinion. First though,&nbsp;&nbsp;

41:54.115 --> 42:01.315
you really should go back and watch that quantum&nbsp;
eraser episode unless your memory is incredible.&nbsp;&nbsp;

42:01.315 --> 42:07.715
Good. Let me review the important bits. Anyway,&nbsp;
we start with a standard double slit apparatus.&nbsp;&nbsp;

42:07.715 --> 42:11.955
Photons are fired one at a time through&nbsp;
the two slits. On the opposite side,&nbsp;&nbsp;

42:11.955 --> 42:16.835
each photon is split into an entangled pair of&nbsp;
photons. One of these is sent off to a screen&nbsp;&nbsp;

42:16.835 --> 42:22.835
where its location is recorded, while the other&nbsp;
is used to identify which slit the original photon&nbsp;&nbsp;

42:22.835 --> 42:27.955
passed through. The setup looks like this. In&nbsp;
the interest of accuracy, let me add a little&nbsp;&nbsp;

42:27.955 --> 42:32.515
detail that I skipped in the previous video.&nbsp;
When the researchers conducted this experiment,&nbsp;&nbsp;

42:32.515 --> 42:38.675
they didn't bother with detector B. There were&nbsp;
really only two sets of possible outcomes. One,&nbsp;&nbsp;

42:38.675 --> 42:44.595
a photon finds its way to detector A. In that&nbsp;
case, we know the original photon must have passed&nbsp;&nbsp;

42:44.595 --> 42:52.995
through slit A. Or two, either detector C or D&nbsp;
fire, in which case we have no idea which slit was&nbsp;&nbsp;

42:52.995 --> 42:59.475
traversed. And the result is that photons whose&nbsp;
entangled twins land at A produce no interference&nbsp;&nbsp;

42:59.475 --> 43:04.195
pattern. They just land in a single pile as though&nbsp;
they had traveled as particles through the entire&nbsp;&nbsp;

43:04.195 --> 43:10.835
experiment. But photons landing at C or D have&nbsp;
twins that do produce an interference pattern&nbsp;&nbsp;

43:10.835 --> 43:16.435
at the screen. One important extra piece of&nbsp;
information, that interference pattern is slightly&nbsp;&nbsp;

43:16.435 --> 43:23.955
different depending on whether C or D fire.&nbsp;
The pattern for C has peaks that line up with&nbsp;&nbsp;

43:23.955 --> 43:30.835
the valleys of the interference pattern from D.&nbsp;
But you see the clear patterns when you separate&nbsp;&nbsp;

43:30.835 --> 43:36.435
those C and D photons. Okay. So the pattern that&nbsp;
forms at the screen depends on whether we gain&nbsp;&nbsp;

43:36.435 --> 43:43.155
knowledge of the path of the original photon. But&nbsp;
crazily all of this detecting or erasing of path&nbsp;&nbsp;

43:43.155 --> 43:49.955
information happens after each photon lands at&nbsp;
the screen. After those photons land according&nbsp;&nbsp;

43:49.955 --> 43:55.955
to an interference distribution or a single pile&nbsp;
distribution. The information regarding whether&nbsp;&nbsp;

43:55.955 --> 44:02.595
the observer knows the path appears to travel&nbsp;
back in time even if it was only a tiny fraction&nbsp;&nbsp;

44:02.595 --> 44:07.955
of a second in the experiment that was performed.&nbsp;
Okay, so with a couple of slight modifications,&nbsp;&nbsp;

44:07.955 --> 44:12.835
I think we can turn this into a communication&nbsp;
device that can not only send information&nbsp;&nbsp;

44:12.835 --> 44:18.035
instantaneously between two points, but&nbsp;
can also send information back in time.&nbsp;&nbsp;

44:18.595 --> 44:23.235
So, my evil genius plan. I'm going to build&nbsp;
a version of this experiment that will let me&nbsp;&nbsp;

44:23.235 --> 44:28.675
send tomorrow's winning lottery numbers back to&nbsp;
myself. Here's how it works. First, let's bring&nbsp;&nbsp;

44:28.675 --> 44:33.875
back detector B. We don't really need it, but it&nbsp;
makes the explanation simpler. As it was executed,&nbsp;&nbsp;

44:33.875 --> 44:41.555
photons can travel to the which way section, so&nbsp;
detectors A and B, or to the eraser section, so C&nbsp;&nbsp;

44:41.555 --> 44:48.835
and D. That choice is made by these beam splitters&nbsp;
which randomly reflect 50% of photons and let 50%&nbsp;&nbsp;

44:48.835 --> 44:54.595
pass through. But what if we could make this&nbsp;
choice? Let's replace these beam splitters with&nbsp;&nbsp;

44:54.595 --> 45:00.195
mirrors attached to a switch. With the mirrors&nbsp;
in place, photons are reflected to the which way&nbsp;&nbsp;

45:00.195 --> 45:05.715
detectors and no interference pattern is formed.&nbsp;
But activate the switch and the mirrors move out&nbsp;&nbsp;

45:05.715 --> 45:11.395
of the way. Photons travel through to the eraser&nbsp;
section resulting in an interference pattern at&nbsp;&nbsp;

45:11.395 --> 45:17.635
the screen. We make the decision of whether to&nbsp;
know the path of the original photon or whether to&nbsp;&nbsp;

45:17.635 --> 45:23.075
erase that knowledge. This conscious choice should&nbsp;
be no different to the random decision of the beam&nbsp;&nbsp;

45:23.075 --> 45:29.715
splitter. Now we have a way to send a binary code&nbsp;
from the switch which is located at the which way/&nbsp;&nbsp;

45:29.715 --> 45:35.395
eraser end of the experiment to the screen which&nbsp;
could theoretically be very distant in both space&nbsp;&nbsp;

45:35.395 --> 45:42.115
and time. Okay, we need one more alteration.&nbsp;
Before the photons get to the which way end,&nbsp;&nbsp;

45:42.115 --> 45:47.555
we freeze them for a day. That's long enough&nbsp;
to buy lots of lottery tickets before the draw.&nbsp;&nbsp;

45:47.555 --> 45:52.195
Actually, you can't really freeze photons. So,&nbsp;
maybe we bounce them between Earth and the Moon&nbsp;&nbsp;

45:52.195 --> 45:57.635
like 8,000 times. Let's just assume we can do&nbsp;
that part perfectly. So, we turn on our device.&nbsp;&nbsp;

45:57.635 --> 46:02.835
Photons start hitting the screen, building&nbsp;
up some pattern. Once the lottery is drawn,&nbsp;&nbsp;

46:02.835 --> 46:09.155
we use our switch to tap out the lottery numbers&nbsp;
in binary code. Those numbers will emerge in the&nbsp;&nbsp;

46:09.155 --> 46:14.435
interference patterns that were recorded a&nbsp;
day ago. Here's my question. Why am I going&nbsp;&nbsp;

46:14.435 --> 46:20.675
to be sadly disappointed after I turn on my&nbsp;
invention? Oh, I do get a signal. Nice work,&nbsp;&nbsp;

46:20.675 --> 46:26.995
future me. And that signal does contain the&nbsp;
interference patterns from my future choices&nbsp;&nbsp;

46:26.995 --> 46:35.315
with perfect fidelity. But for some reason, I&nbsp;
can't read the numbers. What went wrong? Remember,&nbsp;&nbsp;

46:35.315 --> 46:39.715
the landing location of each individual photon&nbsp;
passing through to the interference screen of&nbsp;&nbsp;

46:39.715 --> 46:45.795
this experiment does seem to be influenced by&nbsp;
a decision that is made regarding each of those&nbsp;&nbsp;

46:45.795 --> 46:52.515
photons entangled partners in the future. That&nbsp;
decision was whether we would know the path of the&nbsp;&nbsp;

46:52.515 --> 46:59.395
original photon, thus eliminating an interference&nbsp;
pattern or to erase our knowledge of that path&nbsp;&nbsp;

46:59.395 --> 47:04.435
which brings the interference pattern back. That&nbsp;
decision is made randomly by a beam splitter in&nbsp;&nbsp;

47:04.435 --> 47:09.235
the original experiment. But it's conceivable&nbsp;
that the experiment could be adjusted so that&nbsp;&nbsp;

47:09.235 --> 47:15.875
a person could make the decision. So why can't&nbsp;
I send winning lottery numbers back to myself?&nbsp;&nbsp;

47:15.875 --> 47:20.675
The reason is that there's absolutely no way&nbsp;
to tell if any given photon at the interference&nbsp;&nbsp;

47:20.675 --> 47:26.115
screen has a known path until you compare the&nbsp;
results of the screen with the results at the&nbsp;&nbsp;

47:26.115 --> 47:32.195
detector. In fact, the distribution of photons&nbsp;
at the screen always looks like a single blurred&nbsp;&nbsp;

47:32.195 --> 47:37.715
distribution. There's no visible interference&nbsp;
pattern at all. It's only when you flag which&nbsp;&nbsp;

47:37.715 --> 47:45.315
photons had twins arriving at detectors A, B,&nbsp;
C, or D that you see patterns arise. In fact,&nbsp;&nbsp;

47:45.315 --> 47:51.235
even if you remove all of the A and B photons, you&nbsp;
still don't see an interference pattern until you&nbsp;&nbsp;

47:51.235 --> 47:59.475
distinguish C versus D. And this is because those&nbsp;
photons have interference bands that are exactly&nbsp;&nbsp;

47:59.475 --> 48:05.315
out of phase. The peaks of C line up with the&nbsp;
troughs of D, and together they look like the&nbsp;&nbsp;

48:05.315 --> 48:11.795
same sort of blur you get if you combine A and B.&nbsp;
This is pretty insane. The photon positions are&nbsp;&nbsp;

48:11.795 --> 48:18.435
decided and presumably those patterns are embedded&nbsp;
in the distribution. Those embedded patterns are&nbsp;&nbsp;

48:18.435 --> 48:25.475
set by the eventual destination of the entangled&nbsp;
partners of those photons. But the distribution&nbsp;&nbsp;

48:25.475 --> 48:31.715
may be in place long before those twins finish&nbsp;
their journey. Yet we can't extract the patterns&nbsp;&nbsp;

48:31.715 --> 48:36.995
of the photons that landed at the screen until&nbsp;
we get the information of which detectors their&nbsp;&nbsp;

48:36.995 --> 48:46.035
entangled twins hit. That information can't&nbsp;
travel backwards in time or faster than light.

48:46.035 --> 48:49.715
Is there a hidden physical reality that&nbsp;
underlies the strange behavior of the&nbsp;&nbsp;

48:49.715 --> 48:56.675
quantum world? Or is that reality an illusion in&nbsp;
the eye of the observer? The weird phenomenon of&nbsp;&nbsp;

48:56.675 --> 49:02.835
quantum entanglement gives us quite startling&nbsp;
clues to the answer. Babies may suck at math,&nbsp;&nbsp;

49:02.835 --> 49:08.035
but they're actually surprisingly good at quantum&nbsp;
mechanics. Well, one fundamental aspect of it&nbsp;&nbsp;

49:08.035 --> 49:14.515
anyway, the Peekaboo game is thought to be so&nbsp;
hilarious to babies because they lack object&nbsp;&nbsp;

49:14.515 --> 49:18.595
permanence. Hide your face with your hands and&nbsp;
a baby won't automatically assume that you kept&nbsp;&nbsp;

49:18.595 --> 49:23.715
existing. Reveal your face again and it's as&nbsp;
though you popped into existence from nothing,&nbsp;&nbsp;

49:23.715 --> 49:28.595
which is, of course, a hilarious thing to do.&nbsp;
Kids get over this pretty quickly as they learn&nbsp;&nbsp;

49:28.595 --> 49:33.555
that things don't magically pop into and out&nbsp;
of existence for no reason. By the time they&nbsp;&nbsp;

49:33.555 --> 49:38.115
grow up and go to college to study physics,&nbsp;
the notion of object permanence is so deeply&nbsp;&nbsp;

49:38.115 --> 49:43.715
embedded that we don't even bother teaching it in&nbsp;
physics 101. And yet, the idea that the universe&nbsp;&nbsp;

49:43.715 --> 49:49.155
keeps existing when we're not looking at it is&nbsp;
a pretty fundamental implied assumption behind&nbsp;&nbsp;

49:49.155 --> 49:54.835
all of classical physics. Indeed, most of science&nbsp;
takes it for granted that the universe is real,&nbsp;&nbsp;

49:54.835 --> 50:00.675
whether or not we're looking at it. This notion&nbsp;
that the universe exists independent of the mind&nbsp;&nbsp;

50:00.675 --> 50:08.515
of the observer is called realism in physics. But&nbsp;
quantum mechanics is so bizarre that it still has&nbsp;&nbsp;

50:08.515 --> 50:13.715
scientists wondering if we need to reject even&nbsp;
this basic premise. This was the source of one of&nbsp;&nbsp;

50:13.715 --> 50:20.195
the most heated debates at the advent of quantum&nbsp;
mechanics. On the one hand, Neils Boore insisted&nbsp;&nbsp;

50:20.195 --> 50:25.795
that it was meaningless to assign reality to&nbsp;
the universe in the absence of observation.&nbsp;&nbsp;

50:26.515 --> 50:31.875
In the intervals between measurements,&nbsp;
quantum systems truly exist as a fuzzy&nbsp;&nbsp;

50:31.875 --> 50:39.875
mixture of all possible properties. What we call&nbsp;
a superposition of states in between observations.&nbsp;&nbsp;

50:39.875 --> 50:46.355
The wave function describing this superposition&nbsp;
is a complete description of reality. And our&nbsp;&nbsp;

50:46.355 --> 50:53.315
experience of a well-defined material universe&nbsp;
only has meaning at the moment of measurement.&nbsp;&nbsp;

50:53.315 --> 51:00.755
This peekab-boo universe is the heart of Bor's&nbsp;
Copenhagen interpretation. On the other hand,&nbsp;&nbsp;

51:00.755 --> 51:07.555
Albert Einstein insisted on an objective reality,&nbsp;
a reality independent of our observation of it. He&nbsp;&nbsp;

51:07.555 --> 51:13.875
insisted that the wave function and by extension&nbsp;
quantum mechanics is incomplete. There must exist&nbsp;&nbsp;

51:13.875 --> 51:19.075
what we call hidden variables that reflect a&nbsp;
more physical underlying reality. In an effort&nbsp;&nbsp;

51:19.075 --> 51:25.555
to demonstrate the silliness of Bor's idea,&nbsp;
Einstein along with Boris Podolski and Nathan&nbsp;&nbsp;

51:25.555 --> 51:32.035
Rosen proposed a quantum scenario that showed that&nbsp;
in order to abandon the assumption of realism,&nbsp;&nbsp;

51:32.035 --> 51:39.155
you also had to abandon a concept almost as&nbsp;
sacred. Locality. Locality is the idea that each&nbsp;&nbsp;

51:39.155 --> 51:44.915
bit of the universe only acts on its immediate&nbsp;
surroundings. This is fundamental to Einstein's&nbsp;&nbsp;

51:44.915 --> 51:50.275
relativity which tells us that the chain of&nbsp;
cause and effect can't propagate any faster&nbsp;&nbsp;

51:50.275 --> 51:56.355
than the speed of light. The Einstein Podilski&nbsp;
Rosen or EPR paradox introduces one of the most&nbsp;&nbsp;

51:56.355 --> 52:03.395
mysterious ideas in quantum mechanics. Quantum&nbsp;
entanglement. Here's the idea. Two particles&nbsp;&nbsp;

52:03.395 --> 52:08.515
interact briefly. They influence each other so&nbsp;
that their properties are somehow connected.&nbsp;&nbsp;

52:08.515 --> 52:14.835
And yet we refrain from measuring these properties&nbsp;
to preserve quantum uncertainty. Quantum mechanics&nbsp;&nbsp;

52:14.835 --> 52:20.755
requires that we describe the particle pair with&nbsp;
a single combined wave function that encompasses&nbsp;&nbsp;

52:20.755 --> 52:27.555
all possible states for both particles. We call&nbsp;
such particles an entangled pair. Now, according&nbsp;&nbsp;

52:27.555 --> 52:33.395
to the Copenhagen interpretation, any measurement&nbsp;
of one particle automatically collapses the entire&nbsp;&nbsp;

52:33.395 --> 52:38.835
entangled wave function and so affects the&nbsp;
results of measurements of the other particle.&nbsp;&nbsp;

52:38.835 --> 52:45.635
That's an influence that could theoretically be&nbsp;
transmitted instantly across any distance and&nbsp;&nbsp;

52:45.635 --> 52:53.955
even back in time, violating locality and possibly&nbsp;
violating causality. Einstein at Al thought this&nbsp;&nbsp;

52:53.955 --> 52:59.555
was very silly. They thought that every spatial&nbsp;
point in the universe must be real and physical&nbsp;&nbsp;

52:59.555 --> 53:07.315
and defined by knowable quantities, local hidden&nbsp;
variables that could affect each other no faster&nbsp;&nbsp;

53:07.315 --> 53:13.315
than the speed of light. The argument between Bor&nbsp;
and Einstein felt a bit philosophical at the time,&nbsp;&nbsp;

53:13.315 --> 53:19.795
but in 1964, Irish physicist John Stewart Bell&nbsp;
proposed an experiment to resolve the debate. It&nbsp;&nbsp;

53:19.795 --> 53:26.275
involves entangled electron and posetron pairs.&nbsp;
When spontaneously created from a photon, these&nbsp;&nbsp;

53:26.275 --> 53:32.835
particles will always be spinning in opposite&nbsp;
directions to each other. However, until measured,&nbsp;&nbsp;

53:32.835 --> 53:38.435
we can't know which direction either is spinning.&nbsp;
We just know that they're opposite each other.&nbsp;&nbsp;

53:38.435 --> 53:44.355
Their wave functions are therefore entangled.&nbsp;
Measurement of the spin of one of these particles&nbsp;&nbsp;

53:44.355 --> 53:49.795
tells us the spin of the other, no matter how&nbsp;
large the distance between them. But in quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

53:49.795 --> 53:54.835
mechanics, measurement actually affects the thing&nbsp;
you're measuring. In the case of quantum spin,&nbsp;&nbsp;

53:54.835 --> 54:00.195
that measurement effect is especially weird.&nbsp;
We define spin direction according to the spin&nbsp;&nbsp;

54:00.195 --> 54:06.515
axis. That axis can point in any direction. But&nbsp;
to measure spin direction, we need to choose&nbsp;&nbsp;

54:06.515 --> 54:13.235
an axis to align our measuring device. We always&nbsp;
find that the observed quantum spin aligns itself&nbsp;&nbsp;

54:13.235 --> 54:19.075
with our chosen measurement axis. If we choose&nbsp;
to measure vertically, the spin will turn out&nbsp;&nbsp;

54:19.075 --> 54:26.995
to be up or down. If we measure horizontally,&nbsp;
it'll be left or right. Measurement forces the&nbsp;&nbsp;

54:26.995 --> 54:33.395
alignment of the measured particle. But how does&nbsp;
this affect the spin of its entangled partner? The&nbsp;&nbsp;

54:33.395 --> 54:41.875
answer would settle the bore Einstein debate. Let&nbsp;
me explain. Scenario one. If Einstein was right,&nbsp;&nbsp;

54:41.875 --> 54:47.635
imagine the response of each particle to all&nbsp;
possible spin measurements is encoded in each&nbsp;&nbsp;

54:47.635 --> 54:54.995
particle at the moment of their creation as hidden&nbsp;
variables local to each particle. Nothing we do&nbsp;&nbsp;

54:54.995 --> 55:01.635
later to one particle will then affect the other.&nbsp;
When we later measure the spins of both particles,&nbsp;&nbsp;

55:01.635 --> 55:06.195
there will be a correlation in the results&nbsp;
because the particles were once connected.&nbsp;&nbsp;

55:06.195 --> 55:11.795
But there'll be no correlation due to our&nbsp;
choice of measurement axis. Scenario two,&nbsp;&nbsp;

55:11.795 --> 55:18.035
B was right. What if between creation and&nbsp;
measurement, the electron and posetron only&nbsp;&nbsp;

55:18.035 --> 55:23.955
exist as a wave function of all possible states.&nbsp;
In that case, measurement of one particle spin&nbsp;&nbsp;

55:23.955 --> 55:30.915
should cause the entire wave function to collapse&nbsp;
to take on defined values. Both particles should&nbsp;&nbsp;

55:30.915 --> 55:36.995
then manifest opposite spins along whichever&nbsp;
axis we choose for one of the particles. That&nbsp;&nbsp;

55:36.995 --> 55:41.875
should lead to a correlation between our choice&nbsp;
of measurement axis for the first particle and the&nbsp;&nbsp;

55:41.875 --> 55:48.515
spin direction then measured for the second. This&nbsp;
is exactly the spooky action at a distance that&nbsp;&nbsp;

55:48.515 --> 55:54.195
made Einstein so uncomfortable. So John Stewart&nbsp;
Bell figured out a set of observable results,&nbsp;&nbsp;

55:54.195 --> 56:01.475
the so-called Bell inequalities that we'd expect&nbsp;
to see in the case that Einstein was right and&nbsp;&nbsp;

56:01.475 --> 56:07.955
quantum mechanics needs local hidden variables.&nbsp;
But if an entanglement experiment violates the&nbsp;&nbsp;

56:07.955 --> 56:15.235
Bell inequalities, then local realism is also&nbsp;
violated. By the way, Veritassium describes this&nbsp;&nbsp;

56:15.235 --> 56:20.995
experiment in much more detail in this video.&nbsp;
I recommend you check it out. It's a tricky&nbsp;&nbsp;

56:20.995 --> 56:27.555
experiment because entangled quantum states are&nbsp;
hard to produce but even harder to sustain. Any&nbsp;&nbsp;

56:27.555 --> 56:33.475
interaction can destroy the entanglement. But&nbsp;
in the early 80s, French physicist Alana Spect&nbsp;&nbsp;

56:33.475 --> 56:40.035
succeeded. Instead of looking at the entangled&nbsp;
spins of an electron posetron pair, he used photon&nbsp;&nbsp;

56:40.035 --> 56:45.715
pairs with entangled polarizations. Polarization&nbsp;
is just the alignment of a photon's electric and&nbsp;&nbsp;

56:45.715 --> 56:51.635
magnetic fields. But the principle is the same and&nbsp;
aspect found that there was a correlation between&nbsp;&nbsp;

56:51.635 --> 56:57.395
the choice of polarization measurement axis for&nbsp;
one photon and the final polarization direction of&nbsp;&nbsp;

56:57.395 --> 57:04.275
its entangled partner. The bell inequalities were&nbsp;
violated. The experiment was even set up so that&nbsp;&nbsp;

57:04.275 --> 57:09.795
the influence had to travel between the photons&nbsp;
at faster than the speed of light. Since then,&nbsp;&nbsp;

57:09.795 --> 57:15.075
many experiments have verified this result over&nbsp;
larger and larger distances. The instantaneous&nbsp;&nbsp;

57:15.075 --> 57:20.675
influence has been observed over many kilometers&nbsp;
at this point. The delayed choice quantum eraser&nbsp;&nbsp;

57:20.675 --> 57:26.435
which we already covered is yet another example&nbsp;
of this strange result. It's now been thoroughly&nbsp;&nbsp;

57:26.435 --> 57:32.275
confirmed that the bell inequalities are violated&nbsp;
suggesting that the wave function cannot have&nbsp;&nbsp;

57:32.275 --> 57:38.515
local hidden variables. So does this confirm&nbsp;
the Copenhagen interpretation and kill both&nbsp;&nbsp;

57:38.515 --> 57:44.915
locality and realism? Do we live in a peekab-boo&nbsp;
universe that vanishes into quantum abstraction&nbsp;&nbsp;

57:44.915 --> 57:51.155
when we aren't looking at it? Are babies really&nbsp;
better at quantum mechanics than Einstein? Well,&nbsp;&nbsp;

57:51.155 --> 57:58.035
not so fast. The results of these entanglement&nbsp;
experiments do seem to violate local realism,&nbsp;&nbsp;

57:58.035 --> 58:04.915
but that may mean a violation of realism or just&nbsp;
of locality. In fact, it was Dr. Bell's opinion&nbsp;&nbsp;

58:04.915 --> 58:12.195
that the violation of his inequalities disproved&nbsp;
only locality. Realism could be salvaged.&nbsp;&nbsp;

58:12.195 --> 58:18.595
Non-locality requires that entangled particles&nbsp;
affect each other instantaneously. That sounds&nbsp;&nbsp;

58:18.595 --> 58:24.595
blasphemous to anyone who accepts Einstein's&nbsp;
theory of relativity. However, non-locality and&nbsp;&nbsp;

58:24.595 --> 58:31.395
relativity can actually be perfectly consistent.&nbsp;
Relativity requires that causality is preserved.&nbsp;&nbsp;

58:31.395 --> 58:38.195
So no faster than light information flow. But none&nbsp;
of these entanglement experiments allow any real&nbsp;&nbsp;

58:38.195 --> 58:44.515
information to be transmitted between particles.&nbsp;
It's only possible to see the influence between&nbsp;&nbsp;

58:44.515 --> 58:50.195
the entangled partners after measurements have&nbsp;
been made and those measurements are compared.&nbsp;&nbsp;

58:50.195 --> 58:56.195
Just as we saw with the delayed choice quantum&nbsp;
eraser, the universe seems to conspire to avoid&nbsp;&nbsp;

58:56.195 --> 59:02.035
the paradox of information traveling faster&nbsp;
than light or backwards in time. The Copenhagen&nbsp;&nbsp;

59:02.035 --> 59:09.555
interpretation remains consistent with all quantum&nbsp;
observations. Neils Bore's peekaboo universe may&nbsp;&nbsp;

59:09.555 --> 59:15.315
be the universe we live in. However, realist&nbsp;
and hidden variable interpretations are also&nbsp;&nbsp;

59:15.315 --> 59:21.795
consistent as long as they abandon locality. For&nbsp;
example, entangled particles may be dimensionally&nbsp;&nbsp;

59:21.795 --> 59:28.915
connected by Einstein Rosen bridges, wormholes&nbsp;
that allow instantaneous contact even between&nbsp;&nbsp;

59:28.915 --> 59:36.915
great spatial separations. Also, the De Bruy Bone&nbsp;
pilot wave theory works by assuming realism and&nbsp;&nbsp;

59:36.915 --> 59:44.515
non-local hidden variables. There's even a way&nbsp;
around all of this without sacrificing realism or&nbsp;&nbsp;

59:44.515 --> 59:51.475
locality. That's the many worlds interpretation.&nbsp;
We'll get back to these in an upcoming episode of&nbsp;&nbsp;

59:51.475 --> 59:57.635
Spacetime. The weird rules of the subatomic world&nbsp;
are very, very different to those of the familiar&nbsp;&nbsp;

59:57.635 --> 01:00:05.235
large scale universe. A huge outstanding question&nbsp;
is when and why does the weirdness of quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:00:05.235 --> 01:00:11.475
mechanics give way to classical physics? One&nbsp;
answer to this question suggests that the entire&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:00:11.475 --> 01:00:18.755
universe is so much weirder than we imagined. or&nbsp;
should I say the multiverse. One of the strangest&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:00:18.755 --> 01:00:24.915
features of the quantum description of reality is&nbsp;
the idea of superposition. We can't describe the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:00:24.915 --> 01:00:30.035
most fundamental building blocks of our universe&nbsp;
with defined singular properties. Instead,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:00:30.035 --> 01:00:36.755
they seem to behave as probability clouds&nbsp;
of all properties they might have were we&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:00:36.755 --> 01:00:42.675
to try to measure them. Mathematically, this&nbsp;
is encapsulated in the wave function of a&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:00:42.675 --> 01:00:47.875
quantum particle or system of particles. The&nbsp;
best illustration of why we need to describe&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:00:47.875 --> 01:00:53.075
the quantum world this way is the famous double&nbsp;
slit experiment. We did an episode on it. Check&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:00:53.075 --> 01:00:58.595
it out if you aren't familiar. But to summarize,&nbsp;
a stream of photons or electrons or even molecules&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:00:58.595 --> 01:01:03.635
travels from some point to a detector screen&nbsp;
via a pair of slits. These particles arrive at&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:01:03.635 --> 01:01:08.915
the screen distributed like the interference&nbsp;
pattern you would expect from a simple wave.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:01:08.915 --> 01:01:15.075
Quantum mechanics very successfully predicts this&nbsp;
result by describing each particle's journey as a&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:01:15.075 --> 01:01:21.555
superp position of all possible trajectories. In&nbsp;
other words, the particle simultaneously takes&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:01:21.555 --> 01:01:28.835
all possible paths which means it passes through&nbsp;
both slits. It tries out all histories between&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:01:28.835 --> 01:01:35.155
launch and landing and those many maybe histories&nbsp;
somehow interact with each other to determine the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:01:35.155 --> 01:01:42.115
most likely final destination when a measurement&nbsp;
is made. In a sense, different possible superposed&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:01:42.115 --> 01:01:50.035
histories appear to converge on one final outcome.&nbsp;
But what causes that convergence? In the original&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:01:50.035 --> 01:01:55.635
Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics,&nbsp;
the act of measurement was thought to collapse&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:01:55.635 --> 01:02:01.795
possibility space into a single reality, at&nbsp;
least with respect to the measured property.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:02:01.795 --> 01:02:07.715
It collapses the wave function. That collapse&nbsp;
signifies the transition between the quantum and&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:02:07.715 --> 01:02:14.995
classical realms. One of the founders of quantum&nbsp;
mechanics, Owen Schrodinger, found this ridiculous&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:02:14.995 --> 01:02:20.275
and he proposed his famous Schrodinger's cat&nbsp;
thought experiment to highlight the absurdity. It&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:02:20.275 --> 01:02:27.795
goes like this. A cat is in a box with a flask of&nbsp;
poison. A machine containing a radioactive element&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:02:27.795 --> 01:02:34.595
is set to shatter the flask in the event that&nbsp;
the radioactive element decays. If that happens,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:02:34.595 --> 01:02:42.275
the cat dies. that radioactive decay is a purely&nbsp;
quantum process. And so until it's observed,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:02:42.275 --> 01:02:49.555
it exists in a superp position of states. It has&nbsp;
both decayed and not decayed. But doesn't that&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:02:49.555 --> 01:02:55.475
mean that the entire macroscopic system attached&nbsp;
to that quantum event is also in superp position?&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:02:55.475 --> 01:03:03.795
If so, then the cat should be simultaneously alive&nbsp;
and dead until we open the box. But why can't the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:03:03.795 --> 01:03:10.995
cat collapse its own wave function? And from its&nbsp;
point of view, is the physicist outside also a&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:03:10.995 --> 01:03:17.075
quantum blur until the box is opened? And what&nbsp;
about the entire rest of the universe that's not&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:03:17.075 --> 01:03:24.035
currently being observed by physicists or cats?&nbsp;
Many adherence to Copenhagen now have a more&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:03:24.035 --> 01:03:30.515
sensible resolution to the paradox of Schroinger's&nbsp;
cat. It's that quantum superposition doesn't&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:03:30.515 --> 01:03:38.275
extend to macroscopic scales. It disappears when&nbsp;
different quantum scale histories diverge. This&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:03:38.275 --> 01:03:44.675
is called decoherence. When the wave functions&nbsp;
describing quantum systems overlap sufficiently,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:03:44.675 --> 01:03:50.195
in other words, they are coherent. It's possible&nbsp;
to get interference in the double slit experiment&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:03:50.195 --> 01:03:55.235
and spookily correlated quantum entanglement&nbsp;
measurements. But when these systems interact&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:03:55.235 --> 01:04:01.875
with their environment, coherence is lost and&nbsp;
parallel histories fall out of alignment. They&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:04:01.875 --> 01:04:06.035
can no longer interact with each other. By the&nbsp;
Copenhagen interpretation, we might say that&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:04:06.035 --> 01:04:11.475
the universe chooses the final outcome of all&nbsp;
of those histories. It doesn't exactly choose&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:04:11.475 --> 01:04:18.595
a single history. Instead, it chooses an end&nbsp;
result, say particle location on a screen or&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:04:18.595 --> 01:04:25.395
cat alive or deadness based on those histories.&nbsp;
If a larger number of possible histories lead&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:04:25.395 --> 01:04:31.315
to a given result, then it's more likely that the&nbsp;
universe will select that outcome. The Copenhagen&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:04:31.315 --> 01:04:38.035
interpretation says that this selection happens&nbsp;
in a fundamentally random way. The universe plays&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:04:38.035 --> 01:04:44.595
dice even if the dice are weighted towards&nbsp;
certain results. It is what we would call a&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:04:44.595 --> 01:04:51.235
non-deterministic interpretation because there's&nbsp;
no underlying predictability behind the selection.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:04:51.235 --> 01:04:56.355
However, there is another way to interpret the&nbsp;
transition between the quantum and classical&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:04:56.355 --> 01:05:04.755
worlds. What if the wave function never collapses?&nbsp;
If we can imagine a cat in a superp position of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:05:04.755 --> 01:05:10.755
states, alive and dead, why stop at the cat?&nbsp;
What if the family of possible states extends&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:05:10.755 --> 01:05:16.595
beyond the radioactive decay, beyond the cat,&nbsp;
and includes the observer and indeed the entire&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:05:16.595 --> 01:05:23.155
universe, too? If we open the box and find that&nbsp;
the cat is alive, it's because we are part of an&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:05:23.155 --> 01:05:30.755
entire quantum timeline in which the radioactive&nbsp;
decay and subsequent poisoning never happened.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:05:30.755 --> 01:05:36.915
But there's an equally valid timeline in which&nbsp;
it did and another version of us experiencing&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:05:36.915 --> 01:05:43.395
that. This sounds outrageous, but it's a very&nbsp;
serious interpretation of the mathematics of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:05:43.395 --> 01:05:52.115
quantum mechanics. It was proposed by Hugh Everett&nbsp;
in his 1957 PhD thesis entitled the theory of the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:05:52.115 --> 01:05:58.915
universal wave function. It's come to be known&nbsp;
as the many worlds interpretation. To outline&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:05:58.915 --> 01:06:04.115
the idea without killing so many cats, let's talk&nbsp;
about what this means in the context of the double&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:06:04.115 --> 01:06:10.435
slit experiment. The Copenhagen interpretation&nbsp;
tells us that the superp position of particle&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:06:10.435 --> 01:06:18.435
trajectories of histories merges into the&nbsp;
single timeline of the observer's reality.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:06:18.435 --> 01:06:26.115
Many worlds says this merging never happens.&nbsp;
Those alternative histories continue and we&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:06:26.115 --> 01:06:33.155
find ourselves in just one of those timelines.&nbsp;
Which one? Well, they're all equally likely,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:06:33.155 --> 01:06:39.235
but some look very similar to each other.&nbsp;
For example, many histories lead to photons&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:06:39.235 --> 01:06:45.795
landing on the bright bands of the interference&nbsp;
pattern and very few to the dark bands. We tend&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:06:45.795 --> 01:06:51.955
to find ourselves in the more common families&nbsp;
of histories. This is a pretty crazy notion.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:06:51.955 --> 01:06:57.555
The many worlds interpretation invites the idea&nbsp;
that reality splits into different branches every&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:06:57.555 --> 01:07:03.555
time quantum states diverge into different&nbsp;
possibilities. For example, at every particle&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:07:03.555 --> 01:07:09.475
interaction everywhere in the universe, this would&nbsp;
lead to an unthinkably large number of alternate&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:07:09.475 --> 01:07:16.355
timelines or worlds that contain all possible&nbsp;
realizations of this universe since the big bang.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:07:16.355 --> 01:07:23.315
It seems extravagant to propose uncountable&nbsp;
eternally branching universes just to get out&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:07:23.315 --> 01:07:28.915
of collapsing away function. It's like building&nbsp;
an entirely new house to avoid doing the dishes.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:07:28.915 --> 01:07:35.075
But remember, the Copenhagen interpretation itself&nbsp;
proposes multiple worlds in the superposition of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:07:35.075 --> 01:07:42.755
paths or properties of a quantum system. Both many&nbsp;
worlds and Copenhagen create alternate realities.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:07:42.755 --> 01:07:47.795
It's just that Copenhagen merges them into&nbsp;
a single timeline with its wave function&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:07:47.795 --> 01:07:54.755
collapse. The superposition of states of many&nbsp;
worlds can be thought of as overlaid histories,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:07:54.755 --> 01:08:01.795
slices of a universal wave function that diverge&nbsp;
from each other as the universe evolves, but none&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:08:01.795 --> 01:08:07.955
ever vanish. Many worlds may in fact be the more&nbsp;
pure interpretation of the mathematics of quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:08:07.955 --> 01:08:14.035
mechanics because there's nothing in that math&nbsp;
that requires the collapse of the wave function.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:08:14.035 --> 01:08:20.675
So many worlds is more economical in the number of&nbsp;
unsupported concepts it adds to quantum mechanics,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:08:20.675 --> 01:08:26.275
even if it isn't particularly economical in&nbsp;
the number of universes it predicts. Now,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:08:26.275 --> 01:08:31.715
Everett's idea wasn't taken too seriously when&nbsp;
it was first proposed. That may have been in part&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:08:31.715 --> 01:08:37.315
because he wasn't a well-known physicist. He was&nbsp;
just a graduate student who all but disappeared&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:08:37.315 --> 01:08:44.195
into military research at the Pentagon right after&nbsp;
graduation. But another point of resistance must&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:08:44.195 --> 01:08:51.315
be the overwhelming existential crisis induced&nbsp;
by the idea of near infinite versions of oneself.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:08:51.315 --> 01:08:57.395
Many worlds may imply that every possible version&nbsp;
of you exists out there. uh you're just the one&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:08:57.395 --> 01:09:04.195
who happens to be experiencing this branch of&nbsp;
reality. Every other possible life path, including&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:09:04.195 --> 01:09:10.675
those branching in different directions from&nbsp;
every decision you ever made, may be just as real.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:09:10.675 --> 01:09:17.235
In fact, each may be real in vast multitudes.&nbsp;
There's no more evidence for many worlds than&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:09:17.235 --> 01:09:22.915
there is for other mainstream interpretations of&nbsp;
quantum mechanics. And it is somewhat mainstream&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:09:22.915 --> 01:09:30.915
these days with many noted physicists being&nbsp;
swayed by its parimony, its economy of ideas,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:09:30.915 --> 01:09:35.715
but it remains an interpretation. And so&nbsp;
although it is supported by the incredibly&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:09:35.715 --> 01:09:40.675
successful mathematics of quantum mechanics, it is&nbsp;
not yet added a prediction that might distinguish&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:09:40.675 --> 01:09:47.555
it from other equally supported interpretations.&nbsp;
Nor is it complete in its explanation. There are&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:09:47.555 --> 01:09:51.635
some ideas about what's really happening&nbsp;
when these neighboring coherent histories&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:09:51.635 --> 01:09:57.235
interact or why the wave function translates&nbsp;
to probabilities the way it does, but they are&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:09:57.235 --> 01:10:04.275
far from generally accepted. Unlike Copenhagen,&nbsp;
many worlds is a deterministic interpretation.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:10:04.275 --> 01:10:09.955
Any given timeline is a predictable chain of&nbsp;
cause and effect. It explains the apparent&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:10:09.955 --> 01:10:16.595
randomness of quantum mechanics with a sort of&nbsp;
observer bias. All possibilities are chosen at&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:10:16.595 --> 01:10:21.795
every junction and we just happen to be seeing&nbsp;
the one that happened in the branch that we&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:10:21.795 --> 01:10:30.115
occupy. That adds a second possible cause for&nbsp;
philosophical unease in a purely deterministic&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:10:30.115 --> 01:10:35.715
universe. What happens to free will? If we're&nbsp;
going to make all possible decisions anyway,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:10:35.715 --> 01:10:42.835
why sweat any given choice? Well, sure. But of&nbsp;
all those countless future branches of reality,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:10:42.835 --> 01:10:48.115
some are going to be pretty amazing. Think&nbsp;
of it as a choose your own adventure and&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:10:48.115 --> 01:10:56.435
steer this version of you towards one of the&nbsp;
more awesome many world branches of spaceime.

01:10:57.955 --> 01:11:03.795
There is one interpretation of the meaning of&nbsp;
quantum mechanics that somehow manages to skip&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:11:03.795 --> 01:11:10.755
a lot of the wildly extravagant or near mystical&nbsp;
ideas of the mainstream interpretations. It's the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:11:10.755 --> 01:11:18.675
deb pilot wave theory and despite its alluringly&nbsp;
intuitive nature for some reason it remains a&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:11:18.675 --> 01:11:24.115
fringe theory. Misinterpretation of the ideas&nbsp;
of quantum mechanics has spawned some of the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:11:24.115 --> 01:11:33.635
worst quackery pseudocience hoo-ha and unfounded&nbsp;
mystical storytelling of any scientific theory.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:11:33.635 --> 01:11:39.715
It's easy to see why. There are some pretty out&nbsp;
there explanations for the processes at work&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:11:39.715 --> 01:11:46.115
behind the incredibly successful mathematics of&nbsp;
quantum mechanics. These explanations claim stuff&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:11:46.115 --> 01:11:53.075
like things are both waves and particles at the&nbsp;
same time. The act of observation defines reality,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:11:53.075 --> 01:11:59.235
cats are both alive and dead, or even that the&nbsp;
universe is constantly splitting into infinite&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:11:59.235 --> 01:12:04.435
alternate realities. The weird results of&nbsp;
quantum experiments seem to demand weird&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:12:04.435 --> 01:12:10.035
explanations of the nature of reality. But there&nbsp;
is one interpretation of quantum mechanics that&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:12:10.035 --> 01:12:18.835
remains comfortably almost stodgily physical.&nbsp;
That's de Bruy Bow pilot wave theory. Pilot&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:12:18.835 --> 01:12:25.395
wave theory also known as bomium mechanics stands&nbsp;
in striking contrast to the much more mainstream&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:12:25.395 --> 01:12:31.875
ideas of for example the Copenhagen and many&nbsp;
worlds interpretations. Now we've covered both of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:12:31.875 --> 01:12:39.235
those before and those episodes are really worth&nbsp;
a look. Pilot wave theory is perhaps the most&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:12:39.235 --> 01:12:45.555
solidly physical, even mundane of the complete&nbsp;
and self-consistent interpretations of quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:12:45.555 --> 01:12:52.675
mechanics. But at the same time, it's considered&nbsp;
one of the least orthodox. Why so? Because&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:12:52.675 --> 01:12:58.755
orthodoxy equals radicalism plus time. And the&nbsp;
founding fathers of the Copenhagen interpretation&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:12:58.755 --> 01:13:05.395
of quantum mechanics, Neils Boore and Vera&nbsp;
Heisenberg were radicals. When quantum theory&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:13:05.395 --> 01:13:11.075
was coming together in the 20s, they were fervent&nbsp;
about the need to reject all classical thinking&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:13:11.075 --> 01:13:16.835
in interpreting the strange results of early&nbsp;
quantum experiments. One aspect of that radical&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:13:16.835 --> 01:13:23.235
thinking was that the wave function is not a wave&nbsp;
in anything physical but an abstract distribution&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:13:23.235 --> 01:13:29.395
of probabilities. Borne Heisenberg insisted that&nbsp;
in the absence of measurement, the unobserved&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:13:29.395 --> 01:13:35.395
universe is only a suite of possibilities of the&nbsp;
various states it could take were a measurement to&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:13:35.395 --> 01:13:42.995
be made. And that upon measurement, fundamental&nbsp;
randomness determines the properties of say the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:13:42.995 --> 01:13:50.355
particle that would emerge from its wave function.&nbsp;
This required an almost mystical duality between&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:13:50.355 --> 01:13:57.075
the wave and particle-like nature of matter.&nbsp;
Not everyone was so sure. Einstein famously&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:13:57.075 --> 01:14:03.235
hated the idea of fundamental randomness. But to&nbsp;
counter Bor and Heisenberg, there needed to be a&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:14:03.235 --> 01:14:08.595
full theory that described how a quantum object&nbsp;
could show both wave and particle-like behavior&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:14:08.595 --> 01:14:16.035
at the same time without being fundamentally&nbsp;
probabilistic. That theory came from Louie&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:14:16.035 --> 01:14:21.555
De Bruy, the guy who originally proposed the&nbsp;
idea that matter could be described as waves&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:14:21.555 --> 01:14:28.035
right at the beginning of the quantum revolution.&nbsp;
Droy's theory reasoned that there was no need for&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:14:28.035 --> 01:14:34.835
quantum objects to transition in a mystical way&nbsp;
between non-real waves and real particles. Why&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:14:34.835 --> 01:14:42.835
not just have real waves that push around real&nbsp;
particles? This is pilot wave theory. In it,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:14:42.835 --> 01:14:49.875
the wave function describes a real wave of some&nbsp;
stuff. This wave guides the motion of a real&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:14:49.875 --> 01:14:55.955
pointlike particle that has a definite location&nbsp;
at all times. Importantly, the wave function in&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:14:55.955 --> 01:15:02.675
pilot wave theory evolves exactly according to&nbsp;
the Schrodinger equation. That's the equation at&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:15:02.675 --> 01:15:09.395
the heart of all quantum mechanics that tells the&nbsp;
wave function how to change across space and time.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:15:09.395 --> 01:15:14.995
This means that pilot wave theory makes the&nbsp;
same basic predictions as any other breed of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:15:14.995 --> 01:15:21.635
quantum mechanics. For example, this guiding&nbsp;
wave does all the usual wavy stuff like form&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:15:21.635 --> 01:15:27.635
an interference pattern when it passes through&nbsp;
a pair of slits. Because particles follow the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:15:27.635 --> 01:15:33.155
paths etched out by the wave, it'll end&nbsp;
up landing according to that pattern.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:15:33.155 --> 01:15:39.635
The wave defines a set of possible trajectories&nbsp;
and the particle takes one of those trajectories,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:15:39.635 --> 01:15:45.315
but the choice of path isn't random. If you know&nbsp;
the exact particle position and velocity at any&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:15:45.315 --> 01:15:52.115
point, you could figure out its entire future&nbsp;
trajectory. Apparent randomness arises because&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:15:52.115 --> 01:15:58.275
we can't ever have a perfect measurement of&nbsp;
initial position, velocity, or other properties.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:15:58.275 --> 01:16:06.675
But this hypothetical predictability means that a&nbsp;
pilot wave universe is completely deterministic.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:16:06.675 --> 01:16:13.955
When De Bruyne presented his still incomplete&nbsp;
theory at the famous Solve conference of 1927,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:16:13.955 --> 01:16:20.275
it didn't go down so well. Technical objections&nbsp;
were raised and Neilsborg doubled down on the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:16:20.275 --> 01:16:27.395
probabilistic interpretation. De Bruyne was&nbsp;
convinced and he dropped pilot waves altogether.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:16:27.395 --> 01:16:34.995
The idea was forgotten for decades and Copenhagen&nbsp;
became the orthodoxy. It took until 1952 for&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:16:34.995 --> 01:16:40.595
another physicist, David Bow, to feel very&nbsp;
uncomfortable with some of the wackiness of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:16:40.595 --> 01:16:47.395
Copenhagen and to rediscover De Bruyy's old idea.&nbsp;
Bow took up where De Bruy left off and completed&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:16:47.395 --> 01:16:55.875
the theory. The result was bombium mechanics,&nbsp;
also known as De Bruy Bow pilot wave theory.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:16:55.875 --> 01:17:02.275
These days, more and more serious physicists are&nbsp;
favoring Bow's ideas. However, it's far from being&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:17:02.275 --> 01:17:08.995
broadly accepted. De Bruyne himself remained&nbsp;
firmly in the Copenhagen camp even after Bur's&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:17:08.995 --> 01:17:15.075
efforts. See, although pilot wave theory makes&nbsp;
all of the usual predictions of quantum mechanics,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:17:15.075 --> 01:17:20.355
it has some really fundamental differences.&nbsp;
Those differences are in the sort of special&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:17:20.355 --> 01:17:27.075
thinking you need to do in order to accept pilot&nbsp;
waves over other interpretations. In fact, most&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:17:27.075 --> 01:17:35.555
of the arguments for or against it are about this&nbsp;
special thinking. Are you more or less comfortable&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:17:35.555 --> 01:17:42.355
with the oddness of pilot waves versus the&nbsp;
oddness, say, of Copenhagen or many worlds? So,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:17:42.355 --> 01:17:49.475
what uncomfortable thinking does pilot wave theory&nbsp;
require? Well, for one thing, it needs a teensy&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:17:49.475 --> 01:17:56.035
bit of extra math that mainstream interpretations&nbsp;
don't, as well as the Schrodinger equation that&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:17:56.035 --> 01:18:01.715
tells the wave function how to change. It also&nbsp;
has a guiding equation that tells the particle&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:18:01.715 --> 01:18:10.515
how to move within that wave function. That extra&nbsp;
math is considered unparimious to some, a needless&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:18:10.515 --> 01:18:17.075
added complexity. However, the guiding equation&nbsp;
is derived directly from the wave function. So,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:18:17.075 --> 01:18:23.635
some would argue that it was there all along. A&nbsp;
more troubling requirement of bomium mechanics is&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:18:23.635 --> 01:18:28.675
that it does contain real complexity that is not&nbsp;
encoded in the wave function. That's something&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:18:28.675 --> 01:18:36.195
that Neil's bore was so fervently against. Burmium&nbsp;
mechanics has so-called hidden variables, details&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:18:36.195 --> 01:18:40.835
about the state of the particle that are not&nbsp;
described by the wave function. According to pilot&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:18:40.835 --> 01:18:45.795
wave theory, the wave function just describes&nbsp;
the possible distribution of those variables&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:18:45.795 --> 01:18:53.795
given our lack of perfect knowledge. But hidden&nbsp;
variables have a bad rap in quantum mechanics.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:18:53.795 --> 01:18:59.795
Pretty soon after de Bruy first proposed pilot&nbsp;
waves, the revered mathematician John von Noman&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:18:59.795 --> 01:19:05.315
published a proof showing that hidden variable&nbsp;
explanations for the wave function just couldn't&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:19:05.315 --> 01:19:12.595
work. That proclamation contributed to the long&nbsp;
shelving of pilot wave theory. But in fact,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:19:12.595 --> 01:19:19.075
vonoman didn't quite get the full answer. It turns&nbsp;
out that the restriction against hidden variables&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:19:19.075 --> 01:19:27.155
only applies to local hidden variables. So there&nbsp;
can't be extra information about a specific region&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:19:27.155 --> 01:19:33.155
of the wave function that the rest of the wave&nbsp;
function doesn't know. This was figured out pretty&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:19:33.155 --> 01:19:40.195
soon after vonoman's paper by German mathematician&nbsp;
Greta Herman. Although her reputation wasn't&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:19:40.195 --> 01:19:47.395
noticed until it was reerived by John Bell in the&nbsp;
1960s. This helped the resuscitation of pilot wave&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:19:47.395 --> 01:19:55.875
theory because bombium mechanics doesn't use local&nbsp;
hidden variables. Its hidden variables are global.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:19:55.875 --> 01:20:01.635
The entire wave function knows the location,&nbsp;
velocity, and spin of each particle. This&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:20:01.635 --> 01:20:07.395
non-locality is another weird thing you have to&nbsp;
believe in order to accept pilot waves. Not only&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:20:07.395 --> 01:20:11.795
does the entire wave function know the properties&nbsp;
of the particle, but the entire wave function can&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:20:11.795 --> 01:20:17.235
be affected instantaneously. So a measurement&nbsp;
at one point in the wave function will affect&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:20:17.235 --> 01:20:23.075
its shape elsewhere. This can therefore affect&nbsp;
the trajectories and properties of particles&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:20:23.075 --> 01:20:30.835
carried by that wave potentially very far away.&nbsp;
But quantum entanglement experiments show that&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:20:30.835 --> 01:20:37.235
this sort of spooky action at a distance is a&nbsp;
very real phenomenon. Again, we've gone into&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:20:37.235 --> 01:20:43.875
the non-locality of entangled particles in detail&nbsp;
before. Also worth a look. It's a tough idea to&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:20:43.875 --> 01:20:49.555
swallow, but experiments indicate that some&nbsp;
type of non-locality is real, whether or not&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:20:49.555 --> 01:20:55.555
we accept pilot waves. It would be remiss of me&nbsp;
to talk about pilot waves without mentioning the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:20:55.555 --> 01:21:01.795
amazing analogy that was discovered in bouncing&nbsp;
droplets on a vibrating pool of oil. I'll let&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:21:01.795 --> 01:21:08.275
Veritasium cover this one in detail. It's pretty&nbsp;
amazing. But we see many of the familiar quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:21:08.275 --> 01:21:14.915
phenomena appear in this macroscopic system of&nbsp;
a suspended oil droplet following its own pilot&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:21:14.915 --> 01:21:23.155
wave. Now we shouldn't take a macroscopic analogy&nbsp;
as proof of microscopic reality but it certainly&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:21:23.155 --> 01:21:29.075
demonstrates that this sort of thing does happen&nbsp;
in this universe at least on some scales. I should&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:21:29.075 --> 01:21:35.955
probably also add that debone pilot wave theory&nbsp;
is certainly wrong and I don't think anyone&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:21:35.955 --> 01:21:42.275
could deny that because it doesn't account for&nbsp;
relativity either special or general. That means&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:21:42.275 --> 01:21:49.395
it's at best incomplete. While regular mechanics&nbsp;
has quantum field theory as its relativistic&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:21:49.395 --> 01:21:56.035
version, pilot wave theory hasn't quite got&nbsp;
there yet. Quantum field theory pretty explicitly&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:21:56.035 --> 01:22:03.315
requires that all possible particle trajectories&nbsp;
be considered equally real. Pilot wave theory&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:22:03.315 --> 01:22:10.675
postulates that the particle really takes a single&nbsp;
actual trajectory, the bone trajectory. This is&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:22:10.675 --> 01:22:17.075
not consistent with quantum field theory and so&nbsp;
there isn't a complete relativistic formulation of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:22:17.075 --> 01:22:23.715
bombium mechanics yet. But there is good effort in&nbsp;
that direction. Now, let's not even start talking&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:22:23.715 --> 01:22:30.835
about gravity. No version of quantum mechanics&nbsp;
has that sorted out. Also, we can't ignore&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:22:30.835 --> 01:22:36.275
the fact that the initial motivation behind&nbsp;
pilot wave theory was to preserve the idea of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:22:36.275 --> 01:22:44.515
real particles. And I think we need to be dubious&nbsp;
about that sort of classical bias. All that said,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:22:44.515 --> 01:22:51.155
pilot wave theory does do something remarkable. It&nbsp;
shows us that it's possible to have a consistent&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:22:51.155 --> 01:22:57.555
interpretation of quantum mechanics that is&nbsp;
both physical and deterministic. No hoo-ha&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:22:57.555 --> 01:23:07.475
needed. Maybe something like pilot waves really&nbsp;
do drive the microscopic mechanics of spaceime.

01:23:07.475 --> 01:23:14.275
It's 1928. Over the past quarter century, the&nbsp;
greatest geniuses of the modern era discovered&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:23:14.275 --> 01:23:19.635
the two keys to the fundamental nature of&nbsp;
reality. Einstein's theory of special and&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:23:19.635 --> 01:23:25.795
general relativity had changed forever the way&nbsp;
we think about motion, space, and time. And the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:23:25.795 --> 01:23:30.515
emerging field of quantum mechanics had radically&nbsp;
altered our understanding of the fundamental&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:23:30.515 --> 01:23:37.795
building blocks of the universe. Yet this year&nbsp;
1928, one brilliant insight would bring these&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:23:37.795 --> 01:23:45.315
theories together and unveil the quantum fabric&nbsp;
of reality. It would also predict the existence of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:23:45.315 --> 01:23:51.395
antimatter. By the late 1920s, Einstein and Plunk&nbsp;
had already shown that light is a particle as well&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:23:51.395 --> 01:23:57.955
as a wave. And Louis de Bruy had shown that all&nbsp;
matter has this dual wave particle nature. Bore,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:23:57.955 --> 01:24:03.715
Heisenberg, Bourne and Pley and others pieced&nbsp;
together a mathematical description for the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:24:03.715 --> 01:24:11.795
weird nature of subatomic particles. Then in 1926,&nbsp;
Owen Schroinger wrote down his famous equation,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:24:11.795 --> 01:24:18.915
the Schrodinger equation, which breathed life into&nbsp;
this emerging model. It describes how these matter&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:24:18.915 --> 01:24:25.315
waves represented as wave functions change&nbsp;
over time and allowed physicists to predict&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:24:25.315 --> 01:24:31.875
the evolution of quantum systems such as the&nbsp;
strange interference pattern in the famous double&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:24:31.875 --> 01:24:38.595
slit experiment. Yet, everyone knew there was a&nbsp;
problem. First and most obvious, the Schrodinger&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:24:38.595 --> 01:24:45.555
equation is totally incompatible with Einstein's&nbsp;
relativity. In relativity, the dimensions of space&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:24:45.555 --> 01:24:52.035
and time are intrinsically connected and they flow&nbsp;
into each other as frames of reference change. But&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:24:52.035 --> 01:24:57.875
the Schroinger equation tracks the evolution of a&nbsp;
particle's wave function according to one and only&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:24:57.875 --> 01:25:04.035
one clock. Typically, the clock in the reference&nbsp;
frame of the observer. Relativity tells us that&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:25:04.035 --> 01:25:10.835
the passage of time depends on velocity. So, the&nbsp;
Schroinger equation only works for slowmoving&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:25:10.835 --> 01:25:17.235
objects. That's a problem. Subatomic particles&nbsp;
are often moving at close to the speed of light.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:25:17.235 --> 01:25:22.195
The other problem with the Schrodinger equation&nbsp;
is that it describes particles as simple wave&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:25:22.195 --> 01:25:29.475
functions, distributions of possible positions&nbsp;
and momenta that have no internal properties. Yet,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:25:29.475 --> 01:25:35.875
we now know that many elementary particles&nbsp;
have an internal property called spin.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:25:35.875 --> 01:25:41.955
That doesn't mean that they're actually rotating,&nbsp;
but spin does result in a sort of quantum angular&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:25:41.955 --> 01:25:48.995
momentum. For example, electrons spin causes them&nbsp;
to align themselves with magnetic fields just like&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:25:48.995 --> 01:25:54.995
a rotating electric charge would. The axis of spin&nbsp;
can point in different directions, for example,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:25:54.995 --> 01:26:02.435
up or down. The discovery of quantum spin starts&nbsp;
with an Austrian physicist named Wolf Gang Pi. PI&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:26:02.435 --> 01:26:07.955
realized that to explain electron energy levels&nbsp;
in atoms, those electrons must obey a rule that&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:26:07.955 --> 01:26:14.195
we call the pi exclusion principle. It states&nbsp;
that no electron can occupy the same quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:26:14.195 --> 01:26:20.195
state as another electron. In fact, it applies&nbsp;
to all particles called firmians. In the case of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:26:20.195 --> 01:26:27.155
electrons in atoms, it suggests that we should&nbsp;
only find one electron per atomic orbital if&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:26:27.155 --> 01:26:34.275
we count each orbital as a quantum state. However,&nbsp;
we actually observe two electrons per orbital. And&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:26:34.275 --> 01:26:41.475
so, PI realized there must exist a hidden quantum&nbsp;
state. PI introduced what we call a new degree of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:26:41.475 --> 01:26:47.955
freedom internal to electrons. One that could take&nbsp;
on one of two values. Let's call those values up&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:26:47.955 --> 01:26:54.195
and down. that would allow two separate electrons,&nbsp;
one up, one down, to occupy the same atomic energy&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:26:54.195 --> 01:27:00.755
level without occupying the same quantum state and&nbsp;
therefore violating the pi exclusion principle.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:27:00.755 --> 01:27:06.035
Other physicists soon figured out that this&nbsp;
new quantum state represented spin and the up&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:27:06.035 --> 01:27:12.435
and down degrees of freedom were the direction of&nbsp;
pointing of the angular momentum axis. We now call&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:27:12.435 --> 01:27:19.475
these two component wave functions spinors. Now&nbsp;
it's okay to ignore spin in the old Schrodinger&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:27:19.475 --> 01:27:25.395
equation and get approximate answers. But when a&nbsp;
magnetic field is present, spin direction becomes&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:27:25.395 --> 01:27:32.595
very important. So for fastoving electrons and&nbsp;
for electrons in electromagnetic fields, the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:27:32.595 --> 01:27:39.235
Schrodinger equation gives the wrong answers. The&nbsp;
problem consumed a brilliant British physicist,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:27:39.235 --> 01:27:45.955
Paul Drack. He wanted a fully relativistic version&nbsp;
of the Schrodinger equation that worked for&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:27:45.955 --> 01:27:54.755
electrons. In a way, he started with relativity.&nbsp;
He wrote down Einstein's famous equation E= MC²,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:27:54.755 --> 01:28:01.315
but in its full form, including momentum. He then&nbsp;
used quantum mechanical expressions for energy and&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:28:01.315 --> 01:28:09.635
momentum. The result was a huge mess. But Drack&nbsp;
stumbled upon a single simple idea that caused&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:28:09.635 --> 01:28:16.755
the resulting horrendous mathematics to collapse&nbsp;
into an incredibly simple beautiful equation. That&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:28:16.755 --> 01:28:23.155
simplification required DAC to expand the internal&nbsp;
workings of the electron even further. Instead of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:28:23.155 --> 01:28:30.675
having a two component spinner up and down as in&nbsp;
power theory, he needed four components. Now, he&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:28:30.675 --> 01:28:36.995
had no idea what those two additional mysterious&nbsp;
components might mean. But the resulting equation&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:28:36.995 --> 01:28:41.795
was so simple and elegant that somehow Direct&nbsp;
knew that he was on to something. The resulting&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:28:41.795 --> 01:28:48.675
DRA equation describes the space-time evolution of&nbsp;
this weird four component particle wave function&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:28:48.675 --> 01:28:54.755
represented by the symbol s. It contains the&nbsp;
marks of both quantum mechanics in the plank&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:28:54.755 --> 01:29:01.555
constant and relativity in the speed of light. The&nbsp;
direct equation perfectly predicts the motion of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:29:01.555 --> 01:29:09.395
electrons at any speed, even in an electromagnetic&nbsp;
field. It was a major victory. But it opened up&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:29:09.395 --> 01:29:14.835
even more questions than it answered. To begin&nbsp;
with, what on earth were those two extra degrees&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:29:14.835 --> 01:29:20.675
of freedom in the four component electron? The&nbsp;
answer came from trying to calculate the energy&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:29:20.675 --> 01:29:27.475
of the electron using this equation. It predicted&nbsp;
something totally bizarre. It allowed electrons to&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:29:27.475 --> 01:29:34.435
exist in states of negative energy. If true, that&nbsp;
would lead to some weird effects. For example,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:29:34.435 --> 01:29:41.795
a lone electron moving in an electromagnetic field&nbsp;
could keep releasing energy as light infinitely&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:29:41.795 --> 01:29:47.715
and sink lower and lower to infinite negative&nbsp;
energy states. There was no bottom to the energy.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:29:47.715 --> 01:29:53.955
Well, we know perfectly well that this doesn't&nbsp;
happen. Dur came up with an idea to explain this.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:29:53.955 --> 01:30:00.835
We call it the durac sea. Imagine an infinitely&nbsp;
deep ocean of electrons that exists everywhere in&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:30:00.835 --> 01:30:06.355
the universe. These electrons occupy all of&nbsp;
the negative energy states all the way from&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:30:06.355 --> 01:30:14.515
negative infinity up to zero. The only time we can&nbsp;
actually interact with an electron is when one has&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:30:14.515 --> 01:30:20.675
a positive energy which would leave it sitting on&nbsp;
top of the sea. This is where the ply exclusion&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:30:20.675 --> 01:30:26.675
principle comes back. If the energy states of&nbsp;
this imaginary ocean are all completely full,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:30:26.675 --> 01:30:32.595
then that one extra electron can't lose any&nbsp;
more energy. It just floats on top of the sea.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:30:32.595 --> 01:30:38.915
The idea of the Drax Sea leads to its own weird&nbsp;
predictions. Remove one electron from the surface&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:30:38.915 --> 01:30:45.315
and it leaves a hole. That hole should act like&nbsp;
a particle all by itself. Bit like an eddy on the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:30:45.315 --> 01:30:51.155
surface of a pool of water. It would move around.&nbsp;
It would have inertia acting like it had the mass&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:30:51.155 --> 01:30:56.995
of the missing electron. It would also act like it&nbsp;
had the opposite electric charge to the electron,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:30:56.995 --> 01:31:03.475
a positive charge. And if a positive energy&nbsp;
electron found one of these holes, it would&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:31:03.475 --> 01:31:10.835
fall in, annihilating both and releasing all of&nbsp;
the energy bound up in their masses. Of course,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:31:10.835 --> 01:31:17.875
there is something in our universe that acts&nbsp;
exactly like holes in the Durac Sea. is called&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:31:17.875 --> 01:31:25.555
antimatter and DRA had just predicted its&nbsp;
existence. Now the DRA sea itself doesn't&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:31:25.555 --> 01:31:32.915
really exist but it was one of the first attempts&nbsp;
to describe something very real. The idea of a&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:31:32.915 --> 01:31:38.995
quantum field. We now know that every elementary&nbsp;
particle has an associated field that fills all&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:31:38.995 --> 01:31:46.435
of space. These fields are more like membranes&nbsp;
than infinitely deep oceans. They have a very&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:31:46.435 --> 01:31:52.435
definite energy, usually zero. And the elementary&nbsp;
particles that we know and love are just regions&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:31:52.435 --> 01:31:59.235
where a field has a bit more energy. That energy&nbsp;
manifests as vibrations in the field. Now, quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:31:59.235 --> 01:32:06.195
field theory is a very deep topic and it'll be the&nbsp;
subject of upcoming episodes. But for now, let's&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:32:06.195 --> 01:32:12.995
get to the bottom of these holes. Paul Durac's&nbsp;
negative energy solutions describe antimatter,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:32:12.995 --> 01:32:19.315
not holes in the Direct Sea. Only a few years&nbsp;
after Durac wrote down his equation in 1928,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:32:19.315 --> 01:32:26.915
the posetron, the antimatter electron, was spotted&nbsp;
in cosmic rays by Carl Anderson. Antimatter is&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:32:26.915 --> 01:32:33.395
very real. But what is it? Well, it's a vibration&nbsp;
in the same quantum field as its regular&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:32:33.395 --> 01:32:40.035
matter counterpart. Antimatter's existence is&nbsp;
fundamentally tied to these weird four component&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:32:40.035 --> 01:32:47.155
electrons that Durk invented to make his equation&nbsp;
work. Those two extra components correspond to&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:32:47.155 --> 01:32:53.635
the up and down spins of the electron's antimatter&nbsp;
counterpart. Two spin directions for the electron,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:32:53.635 --> 01:33:00.995
two for the posetron. A four component spinner. In&nbsp;
fact, the electron and the posetron cannot exist&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:33:00.995 --> 01:33:06.515
without each other. They are two sides of the same&nbsp;
coin. Positive and negative energy solutions of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:33:06.515 --> 01:33:12.035
the same type of vibration in the electron field.&nbsp;
It's actually a tiny bit more complicated than&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:33:12.035 --> 01:33:18.115
that and way more awesome, but there will be time&nbsp;
for all of that in the future. So, all elementary&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:33:18.115 --> 01:33:24.115
particles have a quantum field and all have an&nbsp;
antimatter counterpart. Just as with the holes in&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:33:24.115 --> 01:33:30.835
the direct sea, antimatter particles have the same&nbsp;
mass as their counterparts, but opposite charge.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:33:30.835 --> 01:33:36.915
That mass is very real. It's not negative mass&nbsp;
despite this negative energy description. When&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:33:36.915 --> 01:33:42.435
matter antimatter counterparts find each other,&nbsp;
they annihilate, releasing an awful lot of very&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:33:42.435 --> 01:33:48.675
real energy. A penny of antimatter could be&nbsp;
used to launch a goodsized rocket into orbit.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:33:48.675 --> 01:33:55.235
Dur's incredible insight in combining quantum&nbsp;
mechanics and relativity revealed an entire&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:33:55.235 --> 01:34:01.315
flip side of our universe with his prediction&nbsp;
of antimatter. It was also a key step in the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:34:01.315 --> 01:34:06.195
discovery of quantum fields and quantum field&nbsp;
theory and the development of the standard model&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:34:06.195 --> 01:34:11.315
of particle physics which have become our&nbsp;
best description of the underlying workings&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:34:11.315 --> 01:34:21.475
of reality. And that's a quantum rabbit hole that&nbsp;
we'll jump into very soon right here on Spacetime.

01:34:21.475 --> 01:34:26.915
Sometimes intuitive large-scale phenomena can&nbsp;
give us incredible insights into the extremely&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:34:26.915 --> 01:34:34.435
unintuitive world of quantum mechanics. Today,&nbsp;
the humble soundwave is going to open the door to&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:34:34.435 --> 01:34:40.435
really understanding Heisenberg's uncertainty&nbsp;
principle and ultimately quantum fields and&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:34:40.435 --> 01:34:45.715
Hawking radiation. One of the most difficult&nbsp;
ideas to swallow in quantum mechanics is Verer&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:34:45.715 --> 01:34:50.355
Heisenberg's famous uncertainty principle.&nbsp;
It expresses the fundamental limit on the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:34:50.355 --> 01:34:55.875
knowability of our universe. We've discussed it&nbsp;
in earlier videos on quantum mechanics. But it's&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:34:55.875 --> 01:35:01.875
time we looked a little deeper. See, the apparent&nbsp;
weirdness of the uncertainty principle hints at&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:35:01.875 --> 01:35:08.195
an even weirder underlying reality that gives&nbsp;
rise to it. The universe we experience seems&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:35:08.195 --> 01:35:14.355
to be constructed of singular particles with&nbsp;
well- definfined properties. But this intuitive&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:35:14.355 --> 01:35:21.075
mechanical reality is emergent from an underlying&nbsp;
reality in which the particles that form matter&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:35:21.075 --> 01:35:27.715
arise from the combination of an infinity&nbsp;
of possible properties. And forget matter,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:35:27.715 --> 01:35:34.275
the vacuum itself can be thought of as constructed&nbsp;
from the sum of infinite possible particles. If we&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:35:34.275 --> 01:35:40.515
fully unravel this idea, we'll be on the verge&nbsp;
of tackling things like Hawking radiation. But&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:35:40.515 --> 01:35:48.275
as you'll see today in that unraveling, we are led&nbsp;
unavoidably to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:35:48.275 --> 01:35:53.795
The uncertainty principle is most often expressed&nbsp;
in terms of position and momentum. We cannot&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:35:53.795 --> 01:36:00.355
simultaneously know both position and momentum&nbsp;
for a quantum system with absolute precision. Try&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:36:00.355 --> 01:36:07.155
to perfectly nail down a particle's position and&nbsp;
we have complete uncertainty about its momentum.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:36:07.155 --> 01:36:11.395
And it's not just because our measurement&nbsp;
of position requires us to interact with the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:36:11.395 --> 01:36:17.075
particle, therefore changing its momentum. No,&nbsp;
the uncertainty principle exists alongside this&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:36:17.075 --> 01:36:23.555
observer effect. It's instead a statement about&nbsp;
how much information we are ever able to extract&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:36:23.555 --> 01:36:29.635
from a quantum system. To understand the origin&nbsp;
of the uncertainty principle, we don't need to&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:36:29.635 --> 01:36:35.555
know any quantum mechanics. At least not to start&nbsp;
with. See, quantum mechanics is a type of wave&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:36:35.555 --> 01:36:41.315
mechanics. a very weird type. However, it turns&nbsp;
out that something like the uncertainty principle&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:36:41.315 --> 01:36:48.515
arises in any wave mechanics. So, let's choose&nbsp;
a type of wave that's a little more intuitive.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:36:48.515 --> 01:36:55.395
Sound waves. You can describe a sound wave just&nbsp;
as the intensity of the wave as it passes by. So,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:36:55.395 --> 01:37:01.475
intensity changing over time. It can take really&nbsp;
any shape. That shape determines what the wave&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:37:01.475 --> 01:37:08.595
sounds like to our ears. The soundwave for a&nbsp;
simple pure tone like a middle C is a sinosoidal&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:37:08.595 --> 01:37:14.675
wave with the frequency determining the pitch of&nbsp;
the tone. The soundwave from say an orchestra is&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:37:14.675 --> 01:37:22.915
extremely complex but amazingly it can always be&nbsp;
broken down into a combination of many simple sine&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:37:22.915 --> 01:37:30.035
waves of different frequencies. This is Furier's&nbsp;
theorem after French mathematician Jean Baptiste&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:37:30.035 --> 01:37:36.915
de Joseph Furier. It states that any complex&nbsp;
soundwave can be decomposed into a number of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:37:36.915 --> 01:37:42.835
sine waves of different frequencies, each with a&nbsp;
different strength stacked on top of each other&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:37:42.835 --> 01:37:49.235
or superposed. In fact, instead of representing&nbsp;
a sound wave in terms of intensity changing with&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:37:49.235 --> 01:37:55.235
time, you can also represent it in terms of its&nbsp;
frequency components, each with its own waiting&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:37:55.235 --> 01:38:02.355
or strength. When you switch between a time and&nbsp;
a frequency representation, you're doing a forier&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:38:02.355 --> 01:38:09.155
transform. In fact, digital audio equipment&nbsp;
stores, manipulates, and transmits sound in its&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:38:09.155 --> 01:38:15.875
frequency representation. In the physics of sound,&nbsp;
time and frequency have a special relationship&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:38:15.875 --> 01:38:22.035
because any sound wave can be represented in&nbsp;
terms of one or the other. We call them fier&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:38:22.035 --> 01:38:29.875
pairs also sometimes conjugate variables. Okay. So&nbsp;
we can make any shaped soundwave with a series of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:38:29.875 --> 01:38:36.435
sine waves of different frequencies. For example,&nbsp;
you can build a wave packet by adding frequency&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:38:36.435 --> 01:38:43.475
components with the right phases to destructively&nbsp;
interfere everywhere except within a small region.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:38:43.475 --> 01:38:48.595
The tighter you want to make that time window for&nbsp;
the wave packet, the more frequency components you&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:38:48.595 --> 01:38:54.355
need to use. In fact, to get those steep edges of&nbsp;
the wave packet, you need to add higher and higher&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:38:54.355 --> 01:38:59.235
frequencies because the high frequency components&nbsp;
are the ones that give you rapid changes in&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:38:59.235 --> 01:39:05.955
intensity. So, what if you try to compress the&nbsp;
wave packet to a a single spike, a blip of sound&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:39:05.955 --> 01:39:12.195
that exists for only one instant in time? Is it&nbsp;
even possible to make an instantaneous spike at&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:39:12.195 --> 01:39:19.075
one point in time out of a bunch of sine waves&nbsp;
that themselves extend infinitely through time? In&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:39:19.075 --> 01:39:25.635
fact, it is. However, to get a spike at one point&nbsp;
in time, you need to use infinitely many different&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:39:25.635 --> 01:39:32.435
frequency sine waves, each of which exist at all&nbsp;
points in time. So then if we make a sound that&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:39:32.435 --> 01:39:38.595
is perfectly located in time, it doesn't have&nbsp;
a frequency or it has all frequencies. At the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:39:38.595 --> 01:39:44.675
same time, a sound wave with a perfectly known&nbsp;
frequency is a simple traveling sine wave that&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:39:44.675 --> 01:39:51.235
extends infinitely in time. So the time of its&nbsp;
existence is undefined. That sounds an awful&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:39:51.235 --> 01:39:56.675
lot like a frequency time uncertainty principle&nbsp;
for sound waves. Now it's not really a statement&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:39:56.675 --> 01:40:02.675
about the fundamental knowability of a soundwave&nbsp;
as is Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is more a&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:40:02.675 --> 01:40:08.675
statement about the sampling of frequencies needed&nbsp;
to produce a given wave packet. But the underlying&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:40:08.675 --> 01:40:14.755
idea is the same. So how does this relate to the&nbsp;
quantum world? Well, before we get back to quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:40:14.755 --> 01:40:21.075
fields, let's think about the wave function, the&nbsp;
solution to the Schrodinger equation that contains&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:40:21.075 --> 01:40:27.155
all of the information about a quantum system.&nbsp;
Like the soundwave, it oscillates through space at&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:40:27.155 --> 01:40:31.395
a particular frequency. To keep things simple,&nbsp;
we're just going to consider a wave function&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:40:31.395 --> 01:40:37.395
that doesn't vary in time. It only changes with&nbsp;
position in space. This is more like a standing&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:40:37.395 --> 01:40:43.795
soundwave inside an organ pipe rather than the&nbsp;
traveling soundwave from earlier. So position&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:40:43.795 --> 01:40:50.595
rather than time becomes the first of our fier&nbsp;
pair. The second of this pair is momentum,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:40:50.595 --> 01:40:56.275
not frequency. See, momentum is sort of the&nbsp;
generalization of frequency for what we call&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:40:56.275 --> 01:41:01.795
a matter wave. In the early days of quantum&nbsp;
mechanics, it was realized that photons are&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:41:01.795 --> 01:41:08.515
electromagnetic wave packets whose momentum is&nbsp;
given by their frequency. Louis de Bruy extended&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:41:08.515 --> 01:41:14.355
this idea to particles and his de Bruy relation&nbsp;
generalizes the relationship between frequency&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:41:14.355 --> 01:41:21.395
and momentum of a matter wave. we now call matter&nbsp;
waves wave functions and we can describe them in&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:41:21.395 --> 01:41:28.275
terms of position or momentum just as a traveling&nbsp;
sound wave can be expressed in terms of time or&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:41:28.275 --> 01:41:34.595
frequency. So any particle any wave function can&nbsp;
be represented as a combination of many locations&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:41:34.595 --> 01:41:40.355
in space with accompanying intensities. Think of&nbsp;
it as the particle being smeared over possible&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:41:40.355 --> 01:41:46.115
positions or as a combination of many momenta&nbsp;
with accompanying intensities in which case the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:41:46.115 --> 01:41:52.515
particle would be smeared in momentum space. And&nbsp;
of course this means that position and momentum&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:41:52.515 --> 01:41:59.155
have the same kind of uncertainty relation that&nbsp;
time and frequency had in the soundwave. But what&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:41:59.155 --> 01:42:05.475
does it even mean for a particle to be comprised&nbsp;
of waves of many different positions or momenta?&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:42:05.475 --> 01:42:11.955
To answer this, we need one more bit of physics.&nbsp;
The interpretation of the wave function itself,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:42:11.955 --> 01:42:18.595
known as the Bourne rule. The magnitude of&nbsp;
the wave function squared is the probability&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:42:18.595 --> 01:42:23.715
distribution for the particle. If we're expressing&nbsp;
the wave function in terms of position, then&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:42:23.715 --> 01:42:29.795
applying the B rule tells us how likely we are to&nbsp;
find the particle at any given point when we make&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:42:29.795 --> 01:42:35.715
a measurement. Or put another way, the range of&nbsp;
positions in which the particle is likely to be&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:42:35.715 --> 01:42:42.595
located were we to look. If we apply the Bourne&nbsp;
rule to the momentum wave function, then we learn&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:42:42.595 --> 01:42:48.755
the range of momenta the particle is likely to&nbsp;
have. So if we measure a particle's position,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:42:48.755 --> 01:42:54.835
then from our point of view, its wave function&nbsp;
is highly localized in space. We know where the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:42:54.835 --> 01:43:01.075
particle is. The resulting particle wave packet&nbsp;
now constrained in position can only be described&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:43:01.075 --> 01:43:08.435
as a superposition of waves with a very large&nbsp;
range of different momenta via a foria transform.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:43:08.435 --> 01:43:14.595
The result is a very fat momentum wave function&nbsp;
that gives a wide range of possible momenta. The&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:43:14.595 --> 01:43:19.475
more precisely we try to measure position, the&nbsp;
narrower we make its position wave function and&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:43:19.475 --> 01:43:25.475
so the less certain we become about its momentum&nbsp;
as that momentum wave function gets wider.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:43:25.475 --> 01:43:31.715
This is all super abstract, but a concrete&nbsp;
example is single slit defraction. If we&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:43:31.715 --> 01:43:37.315
increase our certainty of the position of a&nbsp;
particle by narrowing the slit, we also increase&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:43:37.315 --> 01:43:42.835
the uncertainty of its momentum as it passes&nbsp;
the slit. This results in an increasing spread&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:43:42.835 --> 01:43:49.315
in final locations. Check out Veritassium's&nbsp;
excellent video to see this in action. So,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:43:49.315 --> 01:43:54.115
that's exactly the uncertainty principle.&nbsp;
It's a statement about how much of a quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:43:54.115 --> 01:44:00.675
systems information is accessible at a fundamental&nbsp;
level. It's an unavoidable outcome of describing&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:44:00.675 --> 01:44:05.795
particles as the superp position of waves.&nbsp;
Waves that can be represented in terms of either&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:44:05.795 --> 01:44:12.115
position or momentum. The fact that both can't&nbsp;
be known simultaneously with perfect precision&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:44:12.115 --> 01:44:17.555
is a property of the nature of the wave function&nbsp;
itself. Precision in one is actually constructed&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:44:17.555 --> 01:44:23.315
by the uncertainty in the other. Okay. So what&nbsp;
does this old school quantum mechanics have to do&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:44:23.315 --> 01:44:28.995
with quantum field theory and Hawking radiation?&nbsp;
Well, the key to understanding these things is to&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:44:28.995 --> 01:44:34.675
be able to switch between thinking about quantum&nbsp;
fields in terms of position versus momentum. See,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:44:34.675 --> 01:44:40.755
a single particle, a quantum field vibration,&nbsp;
perfectly localized at one spot in space,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:44:40.755 --> 01:44:47.395
can also be described as infinite oscillations&nbsp;
in momentum space spanning all possible momenta.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:44:47.395 --> 01:44:53.075
But each of these oscillations in momentum space&nbsp;
are equivalent to particles with highly specific&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:44:53.075 --> 01:44:58.115
momenta. The uncertainty principle therefore tells&nbsp;
us that they must be completely unconstrained&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:44:58.115 --> 01:45:05.555
in position. So a perfectly specially localized&nbsp;
particle is equally an infinite number of momentum&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:45:05.555 --> 01:45:11.795
particles that themselves occupy all locations in&nbsp;
the universe. It's only by manipulating quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:45:11.795 --> 01:45:18.275
fields in this strange momentum space by adding&nbsp;
and removing these spatially infinite particles&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:45:18.275 --> 01:45:23.795
that we can describe how the quantum vacuum&nbsp;
changes to give us phenomena like UNRA and&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:45:23.795 --> 01:45:34.595
Hawking radiation which you'll soon understand&nbsp;
as some of the weirdest behaviors of spaceime.

01:45:34.595 --> 01:45:39.715
Does quantum mechanics allow the future to&nbsp;
retroactively influence the past, as in the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:45:39.715 --> 01:45:45.875
infamous delayed choice quantum eraser experiment?&nbsp;
Well, how about we get an actual quantum physicist&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:45:45.875 --> 01:45:52.035
who many of you already know to show us how&nbsp;
to do this experiment at home and hopefully&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:45:52.035 --> 01:45:57.875
put the matter to rest once and for all. Richard&nbsp;
Feineman said of the double slit experiment that&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:45:57.875 --> 01:46:05.795
it has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In&nbsp;
reality, it contains the only mystery. Well, the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:46:05.795 --> 01:46:11.955
mystery he was talking about is superp position.&nbsp;
In the double slit experiment, that means a superp&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:46:11.955 --> 01:46:19.795
position of a single particle traveling through&nbsp;
both of the double slits at once. The experiment&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:46:19.795 --> 01:46:25.875
hints that prior to detection at a screen, a&nbsp;
quantum particle plays out all possible realities&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:46:25.875 --> 01:46:31.875
that may lead to that one measurement result.&nbsp;
And the shadow of these overlapping realities,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:46:31.875 --> 01:46:38.435
these interacting trajectories is cast on the&nbsp;
screen in the form of an interference pattern.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:46:38.435 --> 01:46:46.355
But if you prune the reality tree early, say by&nbsp;
measurement at one of the slits, the final pattern&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:46:46.355 --> 01:46:52.835
of particle locations reflects that. As if the&nbsp;
standard double slit experiment wasn't strange&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:46:52.835 --> 01:46:59.315
enough, then we have the delayed choice quantum&nbsp;
eraser experiments in which the measurement of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:46:59.315 --> 01:47:07.875
the particles path to the screen is made after the&nbsp;
pattern is recorded on the screen. The most famous&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:47:07.875 --> 01:47:17.555
example is the one by Kim Yu Kulik Shei and Scully&nbsp;
in 1999. Such experiments have been interpreted as&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:47:17.555 --> 01:47:25.715
saying that a future measurement can influence&nbsp;
a past measurement retrocausal influence. We&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:47:25.715 --> 01:47:32.835
did an episode on the delayed choice quantum&nbsp;
arrays a long time ago. Now, we didn't quite&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:47:32.835 --> 01:47:39.155
promote the retrocausal interpretation, but&nbsp;
we certainly failed to give any alternative.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:47:39.155 --> 01:47:46.275
Well, there are now some really solid counter&nbsp;
explanations to the idea of retrocausality. A few&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:47:46.275 --> 01:47:51.875
papers have been published which get at aspects of&nbsp;
it and various YouTube videos also explain some of&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:47:51.875 --> 01:47:58.515
the errors in the retrocausal interpretation.&nbsp;
So, it's time for us to weigh in. Today,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:47:58.515 --> 01:48:06.115
we're actually going to do a real experiment. And&nbsp;
by we, I mean Mithina from Looking Glass Universe,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:48:06.115 --> 01:48:12.995
who's figured out a way to do the quantum eraser&nbsp;
in a homemade setup. She's going to show you how&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:48:12.995 --> 01:48:19.075
this experiment gives the illusion of information&nbsp;
traveling backwards in time. I'm really excited&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:48:19.075 --> 01:48:23.875
to show you this experiment because 12 years&nbsp;
ago, I did a video on the delayed choice quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:48:23.875 --> 01:48:31.235
eraser where I got it completely wrong. And it was&nbsp;
only doing this experiment that made it finally&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:48:31.235 --> 01:48:37.075
click for me. The delay choice quantum eraser&nbsp;
is just a variation on the usual double slit&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:48:37.075 --> 01:48:43.475
experiment. So for that experiment, all you'll&nbsp;
need is some light and two very narrow beams that&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:48:43.475 --> 01:48:50.035
you can shine that laser at. What do we expect to&nbsp;
see? Well, it depends on how we think about light.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:48:50.035 --> 01:48:54.595
On the one hand, we know that light is a wave in&nbsp;
the electromagnetic field. And like any wave, it&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:48:54.595 --> 01:49:00.835
should produce interference patterns as components&nbsp;
of the wave passing through the different slits&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:49:00.835 --> 01:49:06.915
overlap, stacking up or canceling out. At the&nbsp;
wall, we get the classic double slit interference&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:49:06.915 --> 01:49:12.995
pattern. On the other hand, we also think of light&nbsp;
as particles, which is fair because the classical&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:49:12.995 --> 01:49:18.595
electromagnetic wave is made up of indivisible&nbsp;
quantum particles that we call photons.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:49:18.595 --> 01:49:24.915
An intuitive but naive picture for particles&nbsp;
is as a bunch of tiny balls. Spray balls at&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:49:24.915 --> 01:49:29.635
our pair of slits and they should end up forming&nbsp;
two piles corresponding to passage through each&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:49:29.635 --> 01:49:36.835
slit. Photons are really some weird in between&nbsp;
thing between waves and particles. If you fire&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:49:36.835 --> 01:49:42.355
individual photons, they do look like they make&nbsp;
single hits on the wall as though they were tiny&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:49:42.355 --> 01:49:47.795
balls. But after many firings, the double slit&nbsp;
pattern becomes visible. The interpretation&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:49:47.795 --> 01:49:53.155
is that each photon really passes through both&nbsp;
slits as a wave and then the final destination&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:49:53.155 --> 01:49:58.835
of the particle-like spot is determined by the&nbsp;
interference pattern made by that wave. In quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:49:58.835 --> 01:50:05.715
mechanics, we say that the position wave function&nbsp;
of the photon passes through both slits or that it&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:50:05.715 --> 01:50:11.395
exists in a superp position of both trajectories&nbsp;
and in fact of all possible trajectories that&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:50:11.395 --> 01:50:18.755
reach the wall. But when the wall measures the&nbsp;
photon location, that superp position collapses&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:50:18.755 --> 01:50:24.595
and a single position is chosen. Even then,&nbsp;
the path the photon took to get there remains&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:50:24.595 --> 01:50:30.035
undefined. If you want to know the path taken, you&nbsp;
have to measure it before the wall. For example,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:50:30.035 --> 01:50:35.395
you could place a little detector at the slits&nbsp;
that clocks the passing photon without actually&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:50:35.395 --> 01:50:40.195
stopping it. Essentially, we're collapsing&nbsp;
the position wave function of the slits,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:50:40.195 --> 01:50:44.595
not at the wall. Now that we know which slit the&nbsp;
photon passed through, everything we see after&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:50:44.595 --> 01:50:49.875
that has to be consistent with it only passing&nbsp;
through that slit, which means no double slit&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:50:49.875 --> 01:50:56.435
interference pattern. One common misconception&nbsp;
is that if a photon passes through just one slit,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:50:56.435 --> 01:51:02.835
it lands ultimately just like a classical particle&nbsp;
in a single pile of points. But actually single&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:51:02.835 --> 01:51:09.715
slit interference looks like this. It looks a lot&nbsp;
like double slit interference. But if you compare&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:51:09.715 --> 01:51:15.155
them side by side, you can see the difference.&nbsp;
Single slit interference still has dark fringes,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:51:15.155 --> 01:51:21.315
but just not as many as double slit. This is a&nbsp;
form of frownhoffer defraction with the edges&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:51:21.315 --> 01:51:27.875
of the slits causing the interference in this&nbsp;
case. So photons keep behaving like waves even if&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:51:27.875 --> 01:51:33.635
we measure which slit they traversed. If you want&nbsp;
to understand single slit defraction better, Mina&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:51:33.635 --> 01:51:39.395
did a video explaining why this is and what it&nbsp;
means. The transition from double to single slit&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:51:39.395 --> 01:51:44.355
interference occurs when we measure which slit&nbsp;
the photon passed through. We sometimes call this&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:51:44.355 --> 01:51:50.435
a whichway measurement. That's weird enough, but&nbsp;
at least in this case, we have a sensible causal&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:51:50.435 --> 01:51:56.195
ordering. You make the measurement, it collapses&nbsp;
the wave function, stopping it from forming a&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:51:56.195 --> 01:52:01.235
double slit pattern further down the line. Things&nbsp;
get a lot weirder in the case of the delayed&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:52:01.235 --> 01:52:07.395
choice quantum eraser. In the classic experiment&nbsp;
by Kim and collaborators, the photons passing&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:52:07.395 --> 01:52:14.755
through the slits are actually cloned using a beta&nbsp;
barium borate or BBO crystal which converts each&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:52:14.755 --> 01:52:21.635
incoming photon into a pair of near identical&nbsp;
outgoing photons that are quantum entangled.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:52:21.635 --> 01:52:28.995
The key is that both photons in this pair carry&nbsp;
the which way information. They both know which&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:52:28.995 --> 01:52:36.755
slit their progenitor photon passed through before&nbsp;
the BBBO crystal duplicated it. So now we send one&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:52:36.755 --> 01:52:43.715
of the new pair, call it photon A, to our usual&nbsp;
double slit detector to be observed by Alice. The&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:52:43.715 --> 01:52:49.715
other photon B goes to Bob who can extract the&nbsp;
whichway information or alternatively can choose&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:52:49.715 --> 01:52:56.115
to erase that info. The device is simple enough.&nbsp;
The path of photon B depends on which slit it&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:52:56.115 --> 01:53:02.595
came through. So we can place a detector on both&nbsp;
paths and see which one is triggered. We can also&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:53:02.595 --> 01:53:07.795
choose to scramble the whichway information by&nbsp;
recombining those two paths. So there's no way&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:53:07.795 --> 01:53:14.995
to tell them apart anymore. The bizarre result of&nbsp;
the Kim paper and similar experiments is that if&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:53:14.995 --> 01:53:22.995
the whichway information is measured from photon&nbsp;
B, then photon A acts as though we also measured&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:53:22.995 --> 01:53:31.795
which slit it came from. Alice sees that those&nbsp;
photon A's have their whichway info measured and&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:53:31.795 --> 01:53:39.475
fall according to a single slit pattern. But if&nbsp;
the whichway information in photon B is scrambled,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:53:39.475 --> 01:53:45.875
Alice sees the corresponding photon A's landing&nbsp;
according to the classic double slit pattern. It&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:53:45.875 --> 01:53:52.115
acts as though it did pass through both slits.&nbsp;
It's like we change photon A's behavior without&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:53:52.115 --> 01:53:56.915
actually touching it, only by measuring&nbsp;
its twin. And if that wasn't weird enough,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:53:56.915 --> 01:54:01.395
in the Kim experiment, the choice of whether&nbsp;
to keep or discard the whichway information&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:54:01.395 --> 01:54:09.315
in photon B is made after its entangled partner&nbsp;
photon A reached its detector. That makes it seem&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:54:09.315 --> 01:54:14.435
like photon A landed according to a choice that&nbsp;
hasn't been made yet. And this has been referred&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:54:14.435 --> 01:54:21.795
to as retrocausal influence. And it's what makes&nbsp;
the delayed choice quantum eraser so befuddling.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:54:21.795 --> 01:54:26.515
To explain how we can get around this paradox,&nbsp;
I'm going to do an analogous experiment that you&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:54:26.515 --> 01:54:33.155
can do very easily at home. And when I say it's&nbsp;
analogous, what I mean is that it's mathematically&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:54:33.155 --> 01:54:39.155
equivalent. Like if you looked at the maths of&nbsp;
the original experiment versus this experiment,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:54:39.155 --> 01:54:45.715
it's exactly the same except for how you label&nbsp;
a few things. That's not to say though that this&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:54:45.715 --> 01:54:51.315
experiment is as cool as the other one because&nbsp;
the other one involves actual entanglement&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:54:51.315 --> 01:54:58.995
whereas this uses a little trick to kind of mimic&nbsp;
entanglement without actually making an entangled&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:54:58.995 --> 01:55:06.275
photon. Show is able to do but BBO crystals are&nbsp;
very expensive. So we've got our laser here and&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:55:06.275 --> 01:55:12.835
we've also got a double slit. In the original&nbsp;
experiment, for every photon A that goes through&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:55:12.835 --> 01:55:20.515
the slits, they make a photon B which knows the&nbsp;
slit that photon A took. So photon B is what&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:55:20.515 --> 01:55:27.475
stores the information about which way photon A&nbsp;
went. So we need in our experiment some other way&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:55:27.475 --> 01:55:33.235
to store that information. Well, we're going to&nbsp;
do it in a really simple way. Okay, so here's our&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:55:33.235 --> 01:55:40.195
double slit and we've put some filters in front of&nbsp;
it. two different filters in front of each of the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:55:40.195 --> 01:55:46.915
slits. In front of slit one, we have a horizontal&nbsp;
polarization filter and in front of slit two,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:55:46.915 --> 01:55:52.835
we have a vertical polarization filter. Well, now&nbsp;
we know that any light that makes it through this&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:55:52.835 --> 01:55:58.115
double slit is marked. If it's horizontally&nbsp;
polarized, it must have come through slit&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:55:58.115 --> 01:56:04.035
one. Whereas, if it's vertically polarized, it&nbsp;
must have come through slit two. In other words,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:56:04.035 --> 01:56:09.875
the polarization is what's now marking whether&nbsp;
the light went through slit one or slit two,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:56:09.875 --> 01:56:16.995
which is convenient for us because we can use this&nbsp;
crystal to split the light accordingly. So, this&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:56:16.995 --> 01:56:23.955
is called calsite. It's not as cool as BBO, which&nbsp;
is what they used in the original experiment. But&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:56:23.955 --> 01:56:31.555
it does have one very nice property. If I put it&nbsp;
here at this angle, it splits the light into two.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:56:31.555 --> 01:56:37.475
These two bits of light represent the two slits&nbsp;
of the double slit experiment. If the light is&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:56:37.475 --> 01:56:44.915
vertical, it came from slit one. Whereas, if&nbsp;
it's horizontal, it came from slit two. The&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:56:44.915 --> 01:56:50.115
light in the top pattern only went through slit&nbsp;
one. And the light from the bottom pattern only&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:56:50.115 --> 01:56:56.275
went through slit two. So, we'd expect that each&nbsp;
of these patterns are going to be single slit&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:56:56.275 --> 01:57:02.115
patterns. And if you look closely at them, you&nbsp;
can see that they are a double slit pattern would&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:57:02.115 --> 01:57:08.915
have a lot more dark fringes in it. So the calsite&nbsp;
oriented this way is acting just like Bob's which&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:57:08.915 --> 01:57:16.995
way measurement and collapsing the light into a&nbsp;
single slit. But if we rotate the calite by 45°,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:57:16.995 --> 01:57:22.515
we'll see why this new measurement is now going to&nbsp;
look like Bob's arasia measurement and we're going&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:57:22.515 --> 01:57:28.035
to get the double slit pattern back. Okay, so that&nbsp;
took me a while, but I managed to rotate this by&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:57:28.035 --> 01:57:34.195
45°. And I haven't yet put the double slit in&nbsp;
there, but I just want to show you what rotating&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:57:34.195 --> 01:57:42.355
the calite actually does. So, if you look over&nbsp;
there, you can see that there are two dots. Well,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:57:42.355 --> 01:57:47.795
there are roughly two dots. Again, it's a little&nbsp;
bit noisy because my cows site here is nowhere&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:57:47.795 --> 01:57:53.475
near perfect, but roughly it's two dots. And we're&nbsp;
going to give the two dots names. So, we're going&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:57:53.475 --> 01:57:59.155
to call the top one plus, and we're going to&nbsp;
call the bottom one minus. And it's annoying,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:57:59.155 --> 01:58:04.515
but it's an inevitability of this geometry that&nbsp;
they're not aligned with each other anymore. So,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:58:04.515 --> 01:58:09.955
they're not one on top of each other. So, with the&nbsp;
magic of post-prouction, we'll stack these so that&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:58:09.955 --> 01:58:14.515
they are one on top of each other. That's going to&nbsp;
make everything a little bit easier in a second.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:58:14.515 --> 01:58:20.915
To figure out why calsite oriented like this&nbsp;
is going to be an arasia measurement. Let's see&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:58:20.915 --> 01:58:28.275
what happens when we put in vertically oriented&nbsp;
light into this calite. You can see that the total&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:58:28.275 --> 01:58:36.035
amount of light decreases but both dots are still&nbsp;
there. It's not like last time where horizontal&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:58:36.035 --> 01:58:42.115
light all goes to the same dot and vertical light&nbsp;
all goes to the other dot. With this plus and&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:58:42.115 --> 01:58:48.115
minus measurement, half of the vertical light&nbsp;
will go to plus and half will go to minus. And&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:58:48.115 --> 01:58:53.475
same for horizontal. But then what does that tell&nbsp;
us about light that's going to go through this&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:58:53.475 --> 01:58:59.155
marked double slit? So light that goes through the&nbsp;
first slit is horizontally polarized whereas light&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:58:59.155 --> 01:59:05.075
that goes through the second slit is vertically&nbsp;
polarized. And previously our calite was letting&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:59:05.075 --> 01:59:12.195
us measure the polarization and therefore measure&nbsp;
whether it went through slit one or slit two. But&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:59:12.195 --> 01:59:19.315
now think about what this plus minus capsite is&nbsp;
doing. It's going to take light from the first&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:59:19.315 --> 01:59:25.715
slit and it's going to have an equal probability&nbsp;
of ending up at plus or at minus. And same for the&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:59:25.715 --> 01:59:31.475
second slit. So now just looking at the light&nbsp;
after it goes through the calite isn't enough&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:59:31.475 --> 01:59:38.035
to tell us anything at all about which way the&nbsp;
light went. In fact, it scramles up the light&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:59:38.035 --> 01:59:44.355
from both paths. So it basically erases all of&nbsp;
that information that we had gotten by marking&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:59:44.355 --> 01:59:53.795
the paths. So what do we expect to happen then?&nbsp;
Well, let's find out. Oh man, that looks so good.&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:59:53.795 --> 02:00:05.075
Okay. Um, that kind of worked out better than I&nbsp;
expected. Um, okay. So, have a look and hopefully&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:00:05.075 --> 02:00:12.595
you can see two double slit patterns. So, if&nbsp;
we use the calite in its previous orientation,&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:00:12.595 --> 02:00:18.835
then we're using it to measure which way the light&nbsp;
went and that collapses the light into going into&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:00:18.835 --> 02:00:25.395
single slit interference. But if we use the calite&nbsp;
in this orientation, the plus minus orientation,&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:00:25.395 --> 02:00:31.315
we're using it as an eraser, it erases the&nbsp;
information about which slit the light went&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:00:31.315 --> 02:00:37.155
through. And so we're back to the double slit. If&nbsp;
you look really closely at these two double slits,&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:00:37.155 --> 02:00:44.115
you'll see that they don't exactly line up. And&nbsp;
in fact, they seem to be offset from each other&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:00:44.115 --> 02:00:51.395
the exact right amount that if you superimpose&nbsp;
them, it looks like the single slit interference&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:00:51.395 --> 02:00:58.115
pattern. So what's going on? Well, it turns&nbsp;
out that this is the solution to the entire&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:00:58.115 --> 02:01:03.795
paradox. Let's go back to the original&nbsp;
setup to see why. In the Kim experiment,&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:01:03.795 --> 02:01:09.955
photons are cloned by the BBO crystal and the&nbsp;
whichway analysis is done with only one of those.&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:01:09.955 --> 02:01:17.075
We called it photon B. Just as our experiment&nbsp;
sorts the photons into two interference patterns,&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:01:17.075 --> 02:01:24.675
the original experiment sorts the B photons into&nbsp;
two bins. For the measure case, those bins tell&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:01:24.675 --> 02:01:30.515
you which slit the corresponding photon A also&nbsp;
went through. For the eraser case, there are still&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:01:30.515 --> 02:01:37.075
two bins, but there is no whichway information&nbsp;
in how photons are sorted into them. Alice never&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:01:37.075 --> 02:01:42.595
sees a double slit interference pattern until&nbsp;
something very specific occurs. At first, she&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:01:42.595 --> 02:01:50.035
sees just a blob of positions for all photon A's.&nbsp;
Then Bob comes and tells her which of those had a&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:01:50.035 --> 02:01:57.475
twin photon B for which the way info was measured&nbsp;
and for which it was erased. The measured cases&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:01:57.475 --> 02:02:04.275
are still a blob. Basically a blurry single slit&nbsp;
interference. Now, the sum of all of the cases in&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:02:04.275 --> 02:02:13.075
which the whichway info was erased are actually a&nbsp;
very similar mess, a blob. So, Bob also needs to&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:02:13.075 --> 02:02:20.915
tell Alice which of those erased photon B's ended&nbsp;
up in each of the separate eraser detectors. Only&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:02:20.915 --> 02:02:28.595
then can Alice disentangle the featureless blob of&nbsp;
photon A positions and see interference bands. and&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:02:28.595 --> 02:02:35.395
her patterns look a lot like mnas, clear peaks&nbsp;
and valleys that are slightly offset. And when&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:02:35.395 --> 02:02:41.635
you merge them, you get a featureless pile. This&nbsp;
is a critical point that's often glossed over in&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:02:41.635 --> 02:02:48.355
descriptions of the quantum eraser. So to recap,&nbsp;
the solution is Alice always sees the single slip&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:02:48.355 --> 02:02:55.155
pattern, and that's regardless of what Bob chooses&nbsp;
to do on his side. But a single slip pattern is&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:02:55.155 --> 02:03:01.155
really just two double slip patterns on top of&nbsp;
each other. The plus version and the minus version&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:03:01.155 --> 02:03:08.035
that's slightly offset. Now, if Bob does happen&nbsp;
to do the eraser measurement, then he and Alice&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:03:08.035 --> 02:03:15.475
can reconvene afterwards and sort Alice's photons&nbsp;
into the plus and minus groups and they find those&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:03:15.475 --> 02:03:21.635
two double slit patterns. In our experiment,&nbsp;
we did this sorting via calsite, but in the&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:03:21.635 --> 02:03:27.315
real version of the experiment, it just looks like&nbsp;
post-processing the data to make the single slit&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:03:27.315 --> 02:03:33.795
interference pattern into two double slit ones.&nbsp;
So, instead of Bob's arasia measurement instantly&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:03:33.795 --> 02:03:39.235
uncolapsing the wave function and turning the&nbsp;
single slit interference into the double slit,&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:03:39.235 --> 02:03:46.835
you only see this effect of his measurement much&nbsp;
later once he and Alice sift through the data.&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:03:46.835 --> 02:03:53.235
The story told by the retrocausal interpretation&nbsp;
of the delayed choice quantum araser is that Bob's&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:03:53.235 --> 02:03:59.795
choice of measurement retroactively influences&nbsp;
where Alice's photon lands. But the same logic&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:03:59.795 --> 02:04:06.675
works the other way around. The position of&nbsp;
photon A measured by Alice absolutely influences&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:04:06.675 --> 02:04:13.315
where photon B can go, where it's measured&nbsp;
by Bob. Just for reference, I've drawn the&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:04:13.315 --> 02:04:19.555
plus double slit pattern here and the minus one&nbsp;
here just so that we can kind of see where they&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:04:19.555 --> 02:04:30.515
are. And then let's say that Alice measures&nbsp;
her photon and it happens to land right here.&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:04:30.515 --> 02:04:38.515
This lines up perfectly with the minus double&nbsp;
slit pattern, but not at all with the plus one.&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:04:39.315 --> 02:04:45.235
Now after that Bob measures his photon B and he&nbsp;
chooses to do an arasia measurement. So that means&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:04:45.235 --> 02:04:52.035
that there are two possible outcomes. He could get&nbsp;
a plus or he could get a minus. But could he get a&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:04:52.035 --> 02:04:58.915
plus? I mean that wouldn't be consistent with the&nbsp;
result that Alice has already got. And so actually&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:04:58.915 --> 02:05:05.955
Alice's result forces Bob's result to also be&nbsp;
minus. I should add that Alice's measurement of&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:05:05.955 --> 02:05:12.595
the position of photon A only affects one thing&nbsp;
for Bob, and that's which of the eraser detectors&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:05:12.595 --> 02:05:20.275
photon B will land in, assuming photon B makes it&nbsp;
all the way to the eraser section. But then one of&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:05:20.275 --> 02:05:28.115
the eraser detectors will strongly favor photons&nbsp;
whose twin landed in one set of bands on Alice's&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:05:28.115 --> 02:05:34.995
screen, while the other favors the complimentary&nbsp;
set of bands. So, we've had this causality thing&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:05:34.995 --> 02:05:41.395
the wrong way around this whole time. We thought&nbsp;
that it was Bob's measurement that forced Alice's&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:05:41.395 --> 02:05:47.555
photon to act in a particular way, but now we&nbsp;
can see it's the other way around. If Alice's&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:05:47.555 --> 02:05:53.955
measurement happens first, then her outcome is&nbsp;
what determines what happens when Bob does his&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:05:53.955 --> 02:06:00.915
arasia measurement. In other words, Alice's&nbsp;
outcome is what forces Bob's to happen in the&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:06:00.915 --> 02:06:08.435
way it does. But that's only the case if Alice's&nbsp;
measurement happens first and then Bob's. But&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:06:08.435 --> 02:06:16.435
here's the twist. Does Alice's measurement always&nbsp;
happen first? Or does that depend on your frame of&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:06:16.435 --> 02:06:22.515
reference? It's possible to set up this experiment&nbsp;
so that Bob's detections actually happen before&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:06:22.515 --> 02:06:30.675
Alice's just by changing the path lengths for&nbsp;
each section. If we do that, we expect exactly&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:06:30.675 --> 02:06:36.355
the same result. The same interference fringes are&nbsp;
revealed when photon A is filtered according to&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:06:36.355 --> 02:06:44.035
where photon B lands in the eraser. In that case,&nbsp;
it seems that B caused A, but with the same result&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:06:44.035 --> 02:06:51.395
as when A caused B. This makes it harder to assign&nbsp;
a causal power to either case. It's also hard to&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:06:51.395 --> 02:06:57.635
even imagine a causal path connecting Alice and&nbsp;
Bob's observations beyond the sort of spooky&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:06:57.635 --> 02:07:05.555
action at a distance that Einstein so hated. That&nbsp;
said, there is a way to explain the causation that&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:07:05.555 --> 02:07:11.875
connects Alys's and Bob's observations that&nbsp;
doesn't need to assign a causal direction. It&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:07:11.875 --> 02:07:17.555
all depends on what mysterious property really&nbsp;
determines how our photons get sorted into the&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:07:17.555 --> 02:07:23.475
two detectors in the quantum array or how they&nbsp;
are sorted into the two interference patterns&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:07:23.475 --> 02:07:28.995
by the calsite crystal in Mina's experiment.&nbsp;
What property is that? Well, you're going to&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:07:28.995 --> 02:07:36.115
have to wait for an upcoming episode for that one.&nbsp;
But in the meantime, go check out Mith's channel&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:07:36.115 --> 02:07:43.155
for quantum deep dives and more DIY quantum&nbsp;
experiments. It's looking glass universe and it's&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:07:43.155 --> 02:07:50.035
amazing. I also had a long and really fun chat&nbsp;
with Mithna about quantum mysteries, her work, and&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:07:50.035 --> 02:07:55.395
a lot more. It's in our new series of space-time&nbsp;
conversations that you can find in our community&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:07:55.395 --> 02:08:02.995
tab. The delayed choice quantum eraser. It's&nbsp;
weird, but no weirder than any doubles experiment.&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:08:02.995 --> 02:08:26.435
And in case you don't believe me yet, we'll&nbsp;
finalize the debunking in an upcoming spaceime.

02:08:02.995 --> 02:08:10.595
tab. The delayed choice quantum eraser. It's&nbsp;
weird, but no weirder than any doubles experiment.&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:08:02.995 --> 02:08:26.435
And in case you don't believe me yet, we'll&nbsp;
finalize the debunking in an upcoming spaceime.
