WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:04.160
Thank you to Novium, the team behind&nbsp;
the hoverpen, for supporting PBS.

00:04.160 --> 00:08.240
We’ve been looking for messages from the stars&nbsp;
ever since Frank Drake pointed the Green Bank&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08.240 --> 00:14.560
radio telescope at Tau Ceti and Epsilon Eridany&nbsp;
65 years ago. He saw nothing that couldn’t be&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:14.560 --> 00:19.760
explained by natural causes. Nor have the much&nbsp;
more extensive SETI surveys conducted since. So,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:19.760 --> 00:25.200
maybe there are no alien signals to see. Or&nbsp;
maybe we need to update how we search for&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:25.200 --> 00:31.840
them. And maybe when we do that we’ll find that&nbsp;
the aliens have been talking to us all along,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:31.840 --> 00:36.880
and the messages are already sitting&nbsp;
in our astronomical data archives,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:36.880 --> 00:48.800
or will be glaringly obvious is the new generation&nbsp;
of giant surveys that are just now starting.

00:36.880 --> 00:43.280
it lights up after sun exposure—even in&nbsp;
the depths of space. Now on to the episode.

00:36.880 --> 00:43.280
it lights up after sun exposure—even in&nbsp;
the depths of space. Now on to the episode.

00:42.238 --> 00:47.758
Although it’s not exclusively the case, most major&nbsp;
SETI programs have been based on ideas of what WE,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:47.758 --> 00:52.878
humanity could transmit—if not right now,&nbsp;
then in the relatively near future. Well,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:52.878 --> 00:57.838
we’re now IN the relatively near future&nbsp;
compared to the first SETI search of 1960.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:57.838 --> 01:04.078
So how do we shift our thinking based on&nbsp;
what we can now do, and what we now know?

01:04.078 --> 01:08.958
As a launching point, let’s look at a new&nbsp;
paper by Ben Zuckerman. Dr. Zuckerman has&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:08.958 --> 01:14.478
been contributing to and commenting on SETI&nbsp;
research for many decades. The new paper pulls&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:14.478 --> 01:20.398
together his thoughts on how that search needs to&nbsp;
evolve given some updated thinking. Zuckerman’s&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:20.398 --> 01:25.758
proposed strategy updates are centered&nbsp;
around making better guesses about what a&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:25.758 --> 01:31.758
technological civilization might do, or at least&nbsp;
rejecting some previous unfounded assumptions.

01:31.758 --> 01:37.518
There are three main, interconnected points to&nbsp;
consider: transmission technology, how to target&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:37.518 --> 01:44.638
those transmissions; and tying it all together,&nbsp;
the energy available for those transmissions.

01:44.638 --> 01:49.278
Starting with transmission technology&nbsp;
itself. In the 60s we were just getting&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:49.278 --> 01:55.278
really good at building giant radio antennae.&nbsp;
And there were advantages compared to, say,&nbsp;&nbsp;

01:55.278 --> 02:01.598
visible or infrared light transmission. The tech&nbsp;
is simpler—just currents running along chunky&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:01.598 --> 02:07.758
wires—versus advanced materials and micro-scale&nbsp;
engineering needed for visible and infrared light&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:07.758 --> 02:13.038
detectors and transmitters. Radio frequencies also&nbsp;
travel relatively unimpeded through the dustier&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:13.038 --> 02:19.198
regions of interstellar space. So yeah, obviously&nbsp;
aliens would be doing interstellar ham radio.

02:19.198 --> 02:26.558
But the big challenge with radio is that it’s&nbsp;
hard to send a tight beam. For an EM wave,&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:26.558 --> 02:33.038
the tightest possible beam has a spread that’s&nbsp;
equal to the wavelength times distance traveled&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:33.038 --> 02:38.798
divided by the size of the transmitting aperture.&nbsp;
An alien 100 light years away who wanted to flood&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:38.798 --> 02:45.598
earth’s entire orbit with a radio signal would&nbsp;
need a radio array with a 1000 km baseline.

02:45.598 --> 02:52.398
We can and have built the 1000km-scale&nbsp;
baseline radio arrays by now. But even&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:52.398 --> 02:56.718
with this level of collimation, the power&nbsp;
of the signal is still enormously spread&nbsp;&nbsp;

02:56.718 --> 03:02.078
out—over an area 140 billion times the&nbsp;
surface area of the Earth. It would take&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:02.078 --> 03:06.238
an enormous amount of power to make such a&nbsp;
diffuse signal stand out above the galactic&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:06.238 --> 03:12.798
radio background. Early SETI folk guessed&nbsp;
that an energy-limited civilization might&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:12.798 --> 03:18.078
solve this issue by channeling their limited&nbsp;
power into a very narrow radio frequency band.&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:18.078 --> 03:22.478
That spike in the radio spectrum would then&nbsp;
stand out above the galactic background.

03:22.478 --> 03:27.278
Frank Drake even guessed what frequency&nbsp;
aliens might use—the so-called water hole.&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:27.278 --> 03:32.078
It’s a 300 Megahertz span where the&nbsp;
galactic radio background is weakest,&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:32.078 --> 03:36.958
and right between an oxygen and hydrogen&nbsp;
emission lines that Drake guessed formed&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:36.958 --> 03:43.518
a natural framing of a galactic narrow-band&nbsp;
ham network. This sort of narrow-band radio&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:43.518 --> 03:48.158
search strategy drove many of the biggest&nbsp;
past and present SETI programs. And it&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:48.158 --> 03:55.598
seems a reasonable to try this. Except this&nbsp;
strategy hasn’t yielded anything yet. If the&nbsp;&nbsp;

03:55.598 --> 04:01.598
aliens are trying to talk to us, then they’re&nbsp;
not doing it how we think they’re doing it.

04:01.598 --> 04:07.198
According to Zuckerman, one of the keys to&nbsp;
rethinking our strategy is to take seriously&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:07.198 --> 04:12.238
the fact that any technological alien civilization&nbsp;
we’re likely to encounter will have been around&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:12.238 --> 04:18.558
for much longer than we have. That shifts&nbsp;
our thinking on each of our three points:&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:18.558 --> 04:24.398
the transmission tech, the targeting,&nbsp;
and the energy limits. I’ll come back&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:24.398 --> 04:29.278
to how we may need to shift those. But first,&nbsp;
let’s see if we can convince ourselves that&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:29.278 --> 04:35.118
any aliens that we can plausibly notice are&nbsp;
almost certainly more advanced than we are.

04:35.118 --> 04:40.478
Now it comes down to the average longevity of&nbsp;
a technological civilization. Let’s say that&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:40.478 --> 04:45.838
they tend to last for, I dunno, 10,000 years&nbsp;
after becoming able to send noticeable signals&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:45.838 --> 04:52.158
or probes or whatever. We, humanity, are in our&nbsp;
first century of this period. That’s the youngest&nbsp;&nbsp;

04:52.158 --> 05:00.878
1% of galactic civilizations. So, 99% would be&nbsp;
more advanced than us, and 90% are around 1000&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:00.878 --> 05:06.638
years into their technological phase. So also&nbsp;
much more advanced. Even if the civilization&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:06.638 --> 05:11.918
survival time is only 1000 years, most will still&nbsp;
be ahead of us. But if that survival time is much&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:11.918 --> 05:18.158
less than 1000 years then a good fraction of&nbsp;
civilizations are of comparable tech level to&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:18.158 --> 05:25.118
ours. But in that case then the window of their&nbsp;
noticeability is tiny. In order to notice them,&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:25.118 --> 05:32.558
our own 100 years of existence would have&nbsp;
to occur within their 100 or so years plus&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:32.558 --> 05:36.798
the travel time for their signals. And&nbsp;
that overlap window is a vanishingly&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:36.798 --> 05:42.638
small 1-in-100-million fraction of the 10&nbsp;
billion years of the Milky Way’s lifespan.

05:42.638 --> 05:48.398
Of course, the Milky Way may have many of&nbsp;
these razor thin expanding bubbles containing&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:48.398 --> 05:54.158
the desperate hails from newly emergent but soon&nbsp;
to be doomed intelligent species. But the hails&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:54.158 --> 05:59.198
themselves are doomed because no species lasts&nbsp;
long enough to exist during the passage of such&nbsp;&nbsp;

05:59.198 --> 06:05.278
a bubble. And that could be true, but if so the&nbsp;
case is hopeless and we should focus on finding&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:05.278 --> 06:11.038
the signals of species that last longer.&nbsp;
Or at least, so also advises Ben Zuckerman.

06:11.038 --> 06:17.118
So, what will an advanced civilization do&nbsp;
differently? As a relatively more advanced&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:17.118 --> 06:21.118
civilization ourselves—compared to&nbsp;
the 60s and only in very specific&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:21.118 --> 06:27.278
respects—what can we advise regarding&nbsp;
our key factors—tech, targets, energy.

06:27.278 --> 06:32.718
Regarding transmission technology: we know&nbsp;
how to do other things besides radio. With&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:32.718 --> 06:37.678
modern laser technology we can transmit highly&nbsp;
collimated visible and infrared beams of light.&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:37.678 --> 06:42.638
We haven’t built ones big enough to be space&nbsp;
telephones, but in principle we know that it’s&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:42.638 --> 06:48.878
possible and can track a path towards&nbsp;
this in a way that we couldn’t in 1960.

06:48.878 --> 06:54.718
And that helps with… Targeting. Remember that&nbsp;
the spread of a collimated beam is proportional&nbsp;&nbsp;

06:54.718 --> 07:00.158
to wavelength. Visible-light is several tens of&nbsp;
thousands of times shorter wavelength than radio,&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:00.158 --> 07:07.678
with proportionally higher collimation. The&nbsp;
beam collimation we could achieve with our&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:07.678 --> 07:12.718
1000km radio array can be achieved with a&nbsp;
1meter laser aperture or array. Or, if we&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:12.718 --> 07:19.278
say to hell with it and build a 1000-km laser&nbsp;
array—probably an interferometer in space—then&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:19.278 --> 07:25.918
we can focus it to the scale of a single&nbsp;
planet rather than the entire planet’s orbit.

07:25.918 --> 07:31.278
But is it even possible to target a single&nbsp;
planet 100s of light years away. Well maybe,&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:31.278 --> 07:37.918
yes. In the 60s we had no idea whether there&nbsp;
were planets around other stars at all. Now&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:37.918 --> 07:42.238
we know that essentially all stars have them,&nbsp;
and that Earth-sized planets around Sun-like&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:42.238 --> 07:48.078
stars are common. The Kepler mission told us that&nbsp;
this is a statistical necessity, even though we&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:48.078 --> 07:54.718
haven’t actually found exact Earth-analogs.&nbsp;
But we know how to find them in principle.

07:54.718 --> 07:58.158
Most importantly, as emphasized by&nbsp;
Zuckerman, we will ultimately be&nbsp;&nbsp;

07:58.158 --> 08:03.678
able to take pictures of exo-Earths. Using&nbsp;
space-based coronographs and star-shades&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:03.678 --> 08:08.718
and optical or infrared interferometry,&nbsp;
one day we’ll be resolving the surfaces&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:08.718 --> 08:13.758
of Earth-like planets within hundreds of&nbsp;
light years to actually see continents and&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:13.758 --> 08:19.278
oceans and alien forests even city lights.&nbsp;
Spectral information gathered this way,&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:19.278 --> 08:24.158
especially in the infrared, can even reveal&nbsp;
the chemical signatures of an active biosphere.

08:24.158 --> 08:28.638
Even back in the 1980s were gearing up&nbsp;
to build the Terrestrial Planet Finder,&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:28.638 --> 08:32.398
which would have been able to image&nbsp;
exo-Earths within 50 light years.&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:32.398 --> 08:37.998
It was canned due to politics and JWST&nbsp;
costing too much, but now the Habitable&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:37.998 --> 08:43.438
Worlds Observatory will pick up the mission&nbsp;
and get us our first pics in the 2030s. So,&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:43.438 --> 08:48.158
if we’re this close to finding out where the&nbsp;
local habitable and even inhabited worlds are,&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:48.158 --> 08:51.838
surely a civilization far more advanced&nbsp;
than us will have already done so.

08:51.838 --> 08:57.198
And this is one of Zuckerman’s key points.&nbsp;
An advanced species in the local region&nbsp;&nbsp;

08:57.198 --> 09:03.598
that cares at all about locating neighbors&nbsp;
will already know that we are here. And by&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:03.598 --> 09:10.478
“we” I mean life. Our technological signals&nbsp;
are only 100 or so light years out, so only&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:10.478 --> 09:16.238
those within that range know that some primates&nbsp;
figured out how to move electrons around wires.

09:16.798 --> 09:22.078
So now, not only does a technological neighbor&nbsp;
have the ability to send highly collimated&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:22.078 --> 09:29.038
signals, but they also know where to send them.&nbsp;
To the life-bearing worlds in their vicinity.

09:29.038 --> 09:34.398
Which brings us back to the energy issue.&nbsp;
An advanced civilization probably isn’t even&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:34.398 --> 09:41.118
energy limited in the way that the original SETI&nbsp;
programs assumed. We may be able to assume that&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:41.118 --> 09:46.798
signalers will be pumping more energy into&nbsp;
more efficient beams, enabling them to do&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:46.798 --> 09:52.798
various things—like transmitting messages across&nbsp;
many frequencies at once, rather than in single,&nbsp;&nbsp;

09:52.798 --> 09:58.878
narrow bands. And they could also get&nbsp;
their message to us from much further away.

09:58.878 --> 10:03.038
OK, let’s bring together what we’ve&nbsp;
learned. If we follow Zuckerman’s&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:03.038 --> 10:08.398
reasoning, the most likely signals are not&nbsp;
narrow-band radio with wide angular spread,&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:08.398 --> 10:14.558
but rather highly targeted beams that&nbsp;
could appear at any or all frequencies,&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:14.558 --> 10:20.078
more likely within optical or infrared&nbsp;
wavebands. And these could come potentially&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:20.078 --> 10:25.598
from much further away than is possible&nbsp;
with energy-limited radio broadcasts.

10:25.598 --> 10:31.838
He suggests a goal of observing all Sun-like&nbsp;
stars within around 650 Light years,&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:31.838 --> 10:38.158
with the range being chosen somewhat arbitrarily,&nbsp;
but feels like an OK definition of “local” in&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:38.158 --> 10:45.118
our 100,000 light year radius galaxy. In the 650&nbsp;
light year range, there are approximately 60,000&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:45.118 --> 10:51.038
Earth-like planets orbiting Sun-like stars based&nbsp;
on our Kepler projections. Zuckerman whittles&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:51.038 --> 10:57.838
this down to a very crude and maybe conservative&nbsp;
estimate of 600 that resemble Earth in various&nbsp;&nbsp;

10:57.838 --> 11:03.038
other important factors. Of course we don’t know&nbsp;
how close to Earth-like a civilization-spawning&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:03.038 --> 11:08.158
planet needs to be, but erring on the side&nbsp;
of conservative is the right way to start.

11:08.158 --> 11:13.518
OK, so let’s say we locate our target planets&nbsp;
to monitor. What are we really looking for?

11:13.518 --> 11:17.678
Beyond the manner of transmission,&nbsp;
there are also many questions about&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:17.678 --> 11:23.358
what would flag a signal as technological in&nbsp;
origin. Many people have thought about this,&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:23.358 --> 11:29.358
and maybe we cover it in another episode. In&nbsp;
general, we have a good idea of what natural&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:29.358 --> 11:32.718
sources of electromagnetic radiation&nbsp;
look like. They tend to consist of&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:32.718 --> 11:38.718
a combination of a fairly well understood&nbsp;
family of spectra—from hot gas and plasma,&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:38.718 --> 11:43.998
from charged particles moving in magnetic fields,&nbsp;
from electrons hopping between atomic energy&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:43.998 --> 11:50.798
levels. Frequency spikes in unexpected parts&nbsp;
of the spectrum and other unexpected intensity&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:50.798 --> 11:57.198
patterns can signal a non-natural origin. Or we&nbsp;
might expect a strange time-dependence—patterns&nbsp;&nbsp;

11:57.198 --> 12:02.398
can also be encoded in how the signal changes&nbsp;
over time. Sudden and-or periodic changes&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:02.398 --> 12:08.158
in signal strength that may reveal encoded&nbsp;
information not possible for natural sources.

12:08.158 --> 12:13.118
If the signal really does come from another&nbsp;
planet, and if the signal has a distinct&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:13.118 --> 12:18.958
frequency structure, then that should at&nbsp;
least be clear. It’ll move back and forth&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:18.958 --> 12:24.158
slightly in frequency due to Doppler&nbsp;
shift as the planet orbits its star.

12:24.158 --> 12:29.118
The truth is we just don’t know what a&nbsp;
technological transmission might look&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:29.118 --> 12:35.678
like and we can’t rely on aliens thinking&nbsp;
how we think they should think. We’ve been&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:35.678 --> 12:41.598
teased by weird stuff in the past. Like with the&nbsp;
regular pulsation of the first pulsar or radio&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:41.598 --> 12:47.918
spike in the Wow signal—but so far all have been&nbsp;
explained as combinations of natural processes.&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:47.918 --> 12:53.918
The hope is that if our astronomical observations&nbsp;
get smart enough and broad enough, we’ll know a&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:53.918 --> 12:58.798
technological signal when we see it. But for now,&nbsp;
what we need to do is look for anomalies. And&nbsp;&nbsp;

12:58.798 --> 13:04.078
modern SETI is becoming more and mor about anomaly&nbsp;
detection rather than targeted searches for the&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:04.078 --> 13:10.798
digits of pi encoded in a doppler-varying water&nbsp;
hole spike or whatever we imagine “they” will do.

13:10.798 --> 13:15.518
While it’s good to keep an open mind, the problem&nbsp;
with looking for generic anomalies is that the&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:15.518 --> 13:22.398
possibility space is enormous. Back when Frank&nbsp;
Drake did his first SETI search it wasn’t possible&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:22.398 --> 13:28.318
to just look for anything weird coming from&nbsp;
anywhere. Now though? Now it’s not just possible,&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:28.318 --> 13:34.238
we’re kind of already doing it. For example,&nbsp;
the European Space Organization’s HARPS program&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:34.238 --> 13:40.718
uses a telescope in the Chilean Andes to look for&nbsp;
exoplanets around nearly 3000 stars by measuring&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:40.718 --> 13:46.398
the tiny Doppler shift in a star’s spectrum&nbsp;
caused by the similarly tiny wobble in the&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:46.398 --> 13:52.638
star’s motion induced by orbiting planets. But in&nbsp;
a study published last year, Benjamin Fields and&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:52.638 --> 13:58.318
Jason Goodman showed that this same data could&nbsp;
be sensitive to laser communication from these&nbsp;&nbsp;

13:58.318 --> 14:04.078
orbiting worlds. They didn’t find anything … but&nbsp;
it’s a good proof of concept that technosignatures&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:04.078 --> 14:10.718
may be hidden in data we’re already taking.&nbsp;
And maybe in the data we’ve already taken.

14:10.718 --> 14:16.878
This whole idea of piggybacking SETI on existing&nbsp;
astronomy surveys is being called commensal SETI,&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:16.878 --> 14:21.518
and it’s something that Zuckerman highlights&nbsp;
also. The sorts of signals that he expects,&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:21.518 --> 14:26.958
and many others besides, may be observable&nbsp;
in our current and very near future surveys.&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:26.958 --> 14:33.678
Because those surveys are insane. Our ability&nbsp;
to put extremely sensitive, gigantic cameras&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:33.678 --> 14:38.398
on ever-larger telescopes, and to put some of&nbsp;
those telescopes in space has opened up a new&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:38.398 --> 14:45.118
era in astronomy in general—an era of big&nbsp;
data, of all-sky, time domain surveys.

14:45.118 --> 14:50.878
For example, the Rubin Observatory, also in the&nbsp;
Chilean Andes, is about to start its 10-year&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:50.878 --> 14:57.358
survey in which it images the entire southern&nbsp;
sky every 3 days. The Euclid and Grace Roman&nbsp;&nbsp;

14:57.358 --> 15:03.278
telescopes bring this wide-field capability&nbsp;
to the crystal clarity of space, the SKA is&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:03.278 --> 15:07.758
old-fashioned radio, but will be so powerful that&nbsp;
it feels like it’s getting close to the “advanced&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:07.758 --> 15:13.358
civilization” radio telescopes that people like&nbsp;
Frank Drake were imagining back in the 60s.

15:13.358 --> 15:19.438
These facilities are just beginning or about to&nbsp;
begin their work of downloading the universe with&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:19.438 --> 15:25.918
a breadth, depth, and resolution both in space and&nbsp;
time that has never been seen before, and that few&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:25.918 --> 15:31.358
imagined back in the 60’s. And while the main&nbsp;
science drivers are to characterize the natural&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:31.358 --> 15:37.758
universe, they’re also going to be better SETI&nbsp;
programs than any dedicated SETI program to date.

15:37.758 --> 15:43.438
In a paper published in July last year, Eleanor&nbsp;
Gallay and team outlined what the possibilities&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:43.438 --> 15:48.958
might be with the Rubin Observatory. The&nbsp;
data flow from this survey is gigantic,&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:48.958 --> 15:53.118
and there aren’t enough graduate students&nbsp;
in the observable universe to look at every&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:53.118 --> 15:58.718
pixel for every anomaly. But systems are&nbsp;
now in place to automatically monitor the&nbsp;&nbsp;

15:58.718 --> 16:04.638
20 terabytes that come from the telescope&nbsp;
every night to spot interesting changes.&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:04.638 --> 16:10.958
This is done by teams known as data brokers, who&nbsp;
gain quick access to the data and run their clever&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:10.958 --> 16:15.678
algorithms—many of them leaning heavily into&nbsp;
machine learning—to look for different types of&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:15.678 --> 16:20.958
“events”. They’re really focused on natural stuff,&nbsp;
like supernovae and asteroids. But unnatural&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:20.958 --> 16:25.918
variation can also be picked up, especially&nbsp;
with some light patching of the algorithms.&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:25.918 --> 16:30.718
The Gallay team show how the existing&nbsp;
alert structure might also be co-opted&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:30.718 --> 16:37.278
to find a variety of technosignatures, and&nbsp;
that Rubin-LSST is going to enable a scale&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:37.278 --> 16:44.558
of search that may allow us to spot even the&nbsp;
most excruciatingly rare technosignatures.

16:44.558 --> 16:50.158
Commensal SETI isn’t restricted to the&nbsp;
optical-IR-focused surveys that Zuckerman’s&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:50.158 --> 16:56.238
paper emphasizes. For example, it really could be&nbsp;
that the aliens use radio. The square kilometer&nbsp;&nbsp;

16:56.238 --> 17:00.718
array is currently being assembled in South&nbsp;
Africa and Australia and will ramp up its&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:00.718 --> 17:07.118
sensitivity towards its completion date in the&nbsp;
early 2030s. The SKA will take as much data every&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:07.118 --> 17:13.678
second as Rubin does every night. That means the&nbsp;
challenges are of the same family as for Rubin,&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:13.678 --> 17:20.158
but even crazier. How do you pick out potential&nbsp;
signals without having to store every byte?&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:20.158 --> 17:25.838
Several research teams have been working hard&nbsp;
towards building the right alert algorithms. If&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:25.838 --> 17:31.198
aliens do send radio signals, the SKA&nbsp;
is our best change yet to catch them.

17:31.198 --> 17:35.918
Our eyes on the universe are clearer&nbsp;
and wider than ever before. They’ll&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:35.918 --> 17:39.278
show us the beginning and end of&nbsp;
the universe and the lives and&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:39.278 --> 17:44.798
deaths of stars and galaxies and strange&nbsp;
natural phenomena we’ve never imagined.&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:44.798 --> 17:49.278
But a few of us will be watching that&nbsp;
feed from the universe for something&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:49.278 --> 17:58.078
else. Someone else. Signals that we’re not the&nbsp;
only intelligence in this corner of space time.

17:49.278 --> 17:53.758
Father’s day gift or just want one for yourself,&nbsp;
there’s links in the description below and if you&nbsp;&nbsp;

17:49.278 --> 17:59.438
use the code PBS there’s 15% off all hoverpens&nbsp;
for the next 72 hours and 10% off after that.
