WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.480 --> 00:00:05.120
Thank you to novium for supporting&nbsp;
PBS. What does an electron really&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:05.120 --> 00:00:11.440
look like? I mean if we zoom in all the&nbsp;
way is it a sizeless speck of charge? Or&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:11.440 --> 00:00:15.680
is it a multi-dimensional vortex&nbsp;
of quantum strangeness? Is it the&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:15.680 --> 00:00:21.643
boundary of a tiny universe with universe&nbsp;
electrons of its own? Let's find out.

00:00:27.880 --> 00:00:33.520
There isn't much that's simpler than the it's&nbsp;
one of the elementary particles something not&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:33.520 --> 00:00:39.000
made of smaller things at least according to the&nbsp;
current theory. It conjures to mind a single point&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:39.000 --> 00:00:44.280
or perhaps a tiny ball made of some electric&nbsp;
charge and mass and not much else - like in&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:44.280 --> 00:00:50.040
the cartoon description of the atom with electrons&nbsp;
as orbiting balls. But if you've paid attention to&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:50.040 --> 00:00:56.440
good pop-sci media you probably know that these&nbsp;
pictures aren't accurate. Perhaps you know that&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:56.440 --> 00:01:02.640
in quantum mechanics particles exist not as tiny&nbsp;
nuggets of matter but rather as wave functions&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:02.640 --> 00:01:09.920
fuzzy distributions that define the probability of&nbsp;
where or what the particle might be when measured.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:09.920 --> 00:01:17.600
For example electrons in atoms are more accurately&nbsp;
depicted as blurred shells than as orbiting balls&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:17.600 --> 00:01:24.040
and a free electron might look like an undulating&nbsp;
wave packet capable of interfering with itself and&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:24.040 --> 00:01:30.720
doing other wave-like things. But are these&nbsp;
wave functions really what an electron looks&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:30.720 --> 00:01:36.960
like? These wavy structures seem more intuitive&nbsp;
for something like the photon which is literally&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:36.960 --> 00:01:42.320
a wave in the electromagnetic field and whose most&nbsp;
important properties like frequency and wavelength&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:42.320 --> 00:01:48.960
can be captured in wavy terms. But an electron&nbsp;
has mass, it has electric charge, it has spin.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:48.960 --> 00:01:56.120
Where do these properties live in a fuzzy wave&nbsp;
function? There are valiant efforts to represent&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:56.120 --> 00:02:01.120
the non-spatial components of the electron wave&nbsp;
function in particular the spin or wave function&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:01.120 --> 00:02:06.880
which we talk about here but these are attempts&nbsp;
to visualize a pretty abstract concept not really&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:06.880 --> 00:02:15.240
what the electron looks like. So let's take a&nbsp;
look. Let's really zoom in. We can never actually&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:15.240 --> 00:02:21.880
see a fuzzy wave packet because the electron takes&nbsp;
on precise properties when we measure it. Looking&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:21.880 --> 00:02:27.920
at the electron means resolving its location and&nbsp;
spatial structure as we measure more precisely the&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:27.920 --> 00:02:35.400
wave function shrinks to something particle like.&nbsp;
But how far can we zoom? Do we eventually see a&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:35.400 --> 00:02:42.920
tiny ball or an infintesmal speck of charge and&nbsp;
mass? And where does that charge and mass live?&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:42.920 --> 00:02:50.080
What does an electron really look like up close?&nbsp;
There's an agenda behind this thought experiment.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:50.080 --> 00:02:56.280
The very act of zooming in to see what an electron&nbsp;
looks like will reveal some vexing contradictions&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:56.280 --> 00:03:01.880
for example about why the electron has the&nbsp;
properties that it has. These contradictions&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:01.880 --> 00:03:07.400
foreshadow one of the biggest problems in&nbsp;
physics today but that's for future episodes.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:07.400 --> 00:03:14.760
Today we're just looking at the electron. Let's&nbsp;
try constructing an electron first using classical&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:14.760 --> 00:03:19.680
physics. We'll do that by gathering enough&nbsp;
electric charge from the surrounding universe&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:19.680 --> 00:03:27.360
and sticking it together. Like charge repels via&nbsp;
the Coulomb force and Coulomb's law tells us that the&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:27.360 --> 00:03:32.400
closer we want to drag two bits of charge the more&nbsp;
force it takes. That means it takes more energy&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:32.400 --> 00:03:37.760
to assemble a more compact ball of charge than it&nbsp;
does a more diffused one assuming the same amount&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:37.760 --> 00:03:45.040
of charge. A bit of calculus gives us the energy&nbsp;
needed to assemble a ball of any given radius and&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:45.040 --> 00:03:51.520
this is the potential energy that that ball holds&nbsp;
after assembled the smaller the ball the more&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:51.520 --> 00:04:00.480
energy from Einstein's relativity we know that&nbsp;
bound energy is equivalent to mass e =mc^2. So now&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:00.480 --> 00:04:08.040
we can ask the question if we drag in one electron&nbsp;
worth of electric charge until it's in a small&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:08.040 --> 00:04:13.840
enough ball that its potential energy is equal&nbsp;
to the known mass of the electron how big would&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:13.840 --> 00:04:24.480
that ball be well around 2.8 by 10 ^ -5 M. This&nbsp;
is the classical electron radius it's the size&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:24.480 --> 00:04:31.400
an electron would have to be if its mass was all&nbsp;
from the potential energy of it contain charge.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:31.400 --> 00:04:37.880
But it's not the real size of the electron.&nbsp;
Our experiments tell us that the true size of&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:37.880 --> 00:04:45.920
the electron is smaller than 10 ^ -7 M at least&nbsp;
100 times smaller than the classical electron&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:45.920 --> 00:04:52.040
radius. But if we continue to crush our ball of&nbsp;
charge down to that size the mass equivalence of&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:52.040 --> 00:05:00.760
that potential energy is 10G electron volts which&nbsp;
is 20,000 times larger than the actual measured&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:00.760 --> 00:05:10.200
electron mass of 511 kilo electron volts and if&nbsp;
our electron really is point like, having no size&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:10.200 --> 00:05:16.040
then Coulumb's law gets a zero in the denominator&nbsp;
and the energy summed all the way to that central&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:16.040 --> 00:05:25.000
point is infinite. Now the electron isn't really a&nbsp;
ball of electric charge mutually repelling itself.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:25.000 --> 00:05:29.960
Its charge does self- interact in complex&nbsp;
ways manifested in the activity of quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:29.960 --> 00:05:37.440
field surrounding electron as we'll see but the&nbsp;
equations and numbers I came up with do still give&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:37.440 --> 00:05:43.480
the energy contained in the electromagnetic field&nbsp;
that emanates from a bundle of charge of the same&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:43.480 --> 00:05:50.880
size. And so this energy does still contribute&nbsp;
to the electron observed mass. This issue of the&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:50.880 --> 00:05:57.640
electron's electric field containing vastly more&nbsp;
mass than the electron itself is or at least was&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:57.640 --> 00:06:04.080
a real problem and one that persists even when&nbsp;
we switch from classical to quantum mechanics.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:04.080 --> 00:06:10.240
But for now we get back to the electron what&nbsp;
does our zoom in look like when we switch to&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:10.240 --> 00:06:17.400
quantum mechanics or more precisely quantum field&nbsp;
theory? In qft we describe electromagnetism in&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:17.400 --> 00:06:23.040
terms of the activity of a quantum field and each&nbsp;
elementary particle is an excitation in its own&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:23.040 --> 00:06:29.200
quantum field. So the photon is an excitation of&nbsp;
the EM field and the electron and positron are&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:29.200 --> 00:06:35.160
excitations of the electron field. Quantum fields&nbsp;
are sometimes described as these roiling oceans of&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:35.160 --> 00:06:40.720
virtual particles appearing and vanishing. This&nbsp;
isn't very accurate. Instead think of a quantum&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:40.720 --> 00:06:45.680
field as having the potential for complex&nbsp;
and random fluctuations when it encounters a&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:45.680 --> 00:06:52.360
real particle whose fluctuations can be modeled&nbsp;
using virtual particles. As a mathematical tool&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:52.360 --> 00:06:58.600
we can model the coulomb force in terms of virtual&nbsp;
photons in the EM field imparting momentum between&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:58.600 --> 00:07:05.200
charged particles or we can model the spontaneous&nbsp;
transfer of energy between the em and electron&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:05.200 --> 00:07:12.800
fields in terms of a virtual photon turning into&nbsp;
virtual matter anti pairs pair production. In this&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:12.800 --> 00:07:19.800
case a virtual electron and positron. So if the&nbsp;
EM field in quantum field theory is an ocean of&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:19.800 --> 00:07:26.480
virtual photons at least mathematically. What does&nbsp;
that look like? Well viewed from afar the activity&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:26.480 --> 00:07:32.440
of these virtual photons is averaged over in&nbsp;
into the smooth field described by classical&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:32.440 --> 00:07:38.680
electromagnetism but as our zoom in reaches&nbsp;
a certain point around 100 times larger than&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:38.680 --> 00:07:46.360
the classical electron radius we transition to a&nbsp;
regime where we can't ignore the quantum behavior&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:46.360 --> 00:07:52.600
of the field. For example as the field strengthens&nbsp;
and our view narrows we see that the interaction&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:52.600 --> 00:07:58.640
between the em and electron fields strengthens.&nbsp;
We can describe this as an increase in the rate&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:58.640 --> 00:08:04.440
of pair production an increasingly active&nbsp;
flickering of virtual photons and the virtual&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:04.440 --> 00:08:11.160
electron positron pairs that they spawn this cloud&nbsp;
of activity appears to grow stronger the closer we&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:11.160 --> 00:08:16.080
get to the electron. It's not just that we're&nbsp;
seeing the quantum properties of the stronger&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:16.080 --> 00:08:23.880
em field - the very act of probing the electron&nbsp;
this closely amplifies quantum fluctuations. The&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:23.880 --> 00:08:29.520
Heisenberg uncertainty principle tells us that&nbsp;
precision in spatial or temporal measurement&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:29.520 --> 00:08:37.560
leads to larger uncertainty in momentum and energy&nbsp;
respectively the more precise our snapshot of that&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:37.560 --> 00:08:45.160
electron the more energetic quantum fluctuations we'll observe. We talk about this effect in more&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:45.160 --> 00:08:51.040
detail in this video but the upshot is that&nbsp;
the universe looks very different depending&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:51.040 --> 00:08:59.720
on the scale that it's probed and so does the&nbsp;
electron although somehow all scales knit together&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:59.720 --> 00:09:04.960
into a unified whole. We are now at very small&nbsp;
scales quite a bit smaller than the classical&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:04.960 --> 00:09:11.960
radius here. It's clear that the bare electron&nbsp;
appears to be dressed in this cloud of virtual&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:11.960 --> 00:09:18.080
activity this dressing is the source of our self&nbsp;
energy and the extra mass from the electron's EM&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:18.080 --> 00:09:24.200
field. As we zoom ever closer to the electron&nbsp;
the energy in the field approaches the rest&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:24.200 --> 00:09:32.560
mass of the electron and a new interaction becomes&nbsp;
important. Now the virtual electron positron pairs&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:32.560 --> 00:09:39.440
have a decent likelihood of directly interacting&nbsp;
with the central real electron. Sometimes a&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:39.440 --> 00:09:45.720
virtual positron will actually annihilate with&nbsp;
the real electron which then promotes its once&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:45.720 --> 00:09:53.120
virtual partner electron to reality, it's as&nbsp;
though the original electron shifted position.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:53.120 --> 00:09:59.840
There are two important implications to this.&nbsp;
Effect one is that this effect actually recueses&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:59.840 --> 00:10:05.120
the electron from having the colossal or even&nbsp;
infinite mass predicted by classical physics.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:10:05.120 --> 00:10:12.400
More on that next time. Unfortunately the second&nbsp;
implication of this self annihilation interaction&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:10:12.400 --> 00:10:20.120
is that we're never actually going to get a clear&nbsp;
view of the electron no matter how far we zoom in.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:10:20.120 --> 00:10:27.960
The closer we zoom the stronger the surrounding&nbsp;
cloud of virtual fluctuations but also the more&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:10:27.960 --> 00:10:35.120
frequent these interactions become. At some point&nbsp;
the electron become this flickering blur that we&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:10:35.120 --> 00:10:43.280
could never quite fix the location of the mass&nbsp;
ends up smeared out both by the self energy mass&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:10:43.280 --> 00:10:51.360
and by what is ultimately Heisenberg uncertainty.&nbsp;
The electron's charge is also smeared out by the&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:10:51.360 --> 00:10:57.560
latter and also smeared by something that I&nbsp;
haven't told you about yet. Even before we got&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:10:57.560 --> 00:11:04.000
close to the central electron virtual electron&nbsp;
positron pairs we're smearing out that charge&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:11:04.000 --> 00:11:11.400
those pairs interact with the ambient em field&nbsp;
with the positrons tending to shift closer to the&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:11:11.400 --> 00:11:19.320
center while virtual electrons shift further away.&nbsp;
This so-called vacuum polarization happens all&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:11:19.320 --> 00:11:25.400
around the central electron and has the effect of&nbsp;
screening the external universe from that central&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:11:25.400 --> 00:11:33.120
charge. In fact the observed charge should appear&nbsp;
to rise as we get closer to the center past this&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:11:33.120 --> 00:11:39.800
screening. If you calculate the effective charge&nbsp;
screening all the way to infinitesimal distances&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:11:39.800 --> 00:11:45.360
that central charge has to be infinite - that&nbsp;
means the central electron would need to have&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:11:45.360 --> 00:11:50.520
infinite charge itself to overcome that infinite&nbsp;
charge screening. Of course we now know that we&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:11:50.520 --> 00:11:57.360
can never probe the electron down to a perfectly&nbsp;
localized point so that infinity is probably&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:11:57.360 --> 00:12:04.240
meaningless. However if it is true that the&nbsp;
strength of the electromagnetic force increases at&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:12:04.240 --> 00:12:10.240
extremely small distances when charge screening is&nbsp;
overcome even though we can't catch our electron&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:12:10.240 --> 00:12:16.480
in our infinite zoom the elusive particle is&nbsp;
extremely well understood at least mathematically.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:12:16.480 --> 00:12:22.200
We even know how to rescue the electron from&nbsp;
having its mass and charge explode due to its&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:12:22.200 --> 00:12:26.920
interaction with the surrounding quantum fields -&nbsp;
although to understand that we need a tool called&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:12:26.920 --> 00:12:33.040
renormalization which we'll explore soon. And&nbsp;
we'll also see how this tricky issue with the&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:12:33.040 --> 00:12:39.800
electron foreshadowed a much much bigger conundrum&nbsp;
in physics - the hierarchy problem. And will meet&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:12:39.800 --> 00:12:47.480
the particle that has yet to be rescued from this&nbsp;
issue. But that is also another story. For now&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:12:47.480 --> 00:12:55.680
let's admire the tiny electron outwardly simple&nbsp;
but inwardly mercurial and it's a strangeness that&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:12:55.680 --> 00:13:04.040
only compounds as we localize it in SpaceTime.&nbsp;
Thank you to Novium for supporting PBS. Inspired&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:13:04.040 --> 00:13:09.520
by space, the Novium Hoverpen: Interstellar is an&nbsp;
otherworldly gift idea for yourself or the amazing&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:13:09.520 --> 00:13:14.320
people in your life. The Hoverpen Interstellar&nbsp;
is available in Space Black, Starlight Silver,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:13:14.320 --> 00:13:21.000
Mars Magma and Neptune Blue and is refillable. The&nbsp;
Meteorite Embedded Space Black edition contains a&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:13:21.000 --> 00:13:27.360
subtle reminder that we here on Earth are truly a&nbsp;
part of a greater galactic whole. Each Meteorite&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:13:27.360 --> 00:13:33.480
edition features a fragment of the Muonionalusta&nbsp;
meteorite confirmed by a stainless-steel&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:13:33.480 --> 00:13:39.480
certificate. Landing in northern Scandinavia&nbsp;
more than a million years ago the Muonionalusta&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:13:39.480 --> 00:13:47.920
meteorite was formed inside a planetoid core and&nbsp;
is estimated to be 4.56 billion years old making&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:13:47.920 --> 00:13:55.000
it older than the Earth itself. If you want&nbsp;
to give a gift, Novium has also introduced a&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:13:55.000 --> 00:14:01.840
9-piece gift set which includes the Novium dock&nbsp;
- a display stand with gravitating illusion. Of&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:14:01.840 --> 00:14:08.600
course, if you or your special someone prefers a&nbsp;
fountain pen, then there’s also the Novium Future&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:14:08.600 --> 00:14:14.480
which can be ordered as a Fountain &amp; Rollerball&nbsp;
2-in-1 or just as a Fountain Pen. Feel free to use&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:14:14.480 --> 00:14:21.320
the links in the description below and get 10% off&nbsp;
all Hoverpens with code PBS. There's international&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:14:21.320 --> 00:14:27.120
shipping for most countries and orders are still&nbsp;
available for delivery before the holidays.

00:14:27.120 --> 00:14:31.840
Hi Everyone. It’s that time of year again. We&nbsp;
want to hear your thoughts and opinions on the&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:14:31.840 --> 00:14:38.320
PBS Digital Studio Survey! Every year, the Space&nbsp;
Time fans have been the most active fan group on&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:14:38.320 --> 00:14:44.000
PBS Digital Studios audience survey, which&nbsp;
we and the rest of PBS Digital Studios use&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:14:44.000 --> 00:14:49.600
to help understand what you enjoy on YouTube&nbsp;
and what you would want to see us make more&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:14:49.600 --> 00:14:57.240
of. You also get to vote on new show ideas. There&nbsp;
is a link in the description - thanks in advance!

00:14:57.240 --> 00:15:02.320
Hey Everyone. Before we go, we just wanted to&nbsp;
let you know, there will be 15% off the whole&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:15:02.320 --> 00:15:07.760
Mercch store for all of December. All of this&nbsp;
year's merch, including limited edition items&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:15:07.760 --> 00:15:12.800
are back on the store, so if there’s Space&nbsp;
Time merch you’ve thought of picking up for&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:15:12.800 --> 00:15:16.400
you or another nerd in your constellation&nbsp;
of social connections, now’s a great time.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:15:16.400 --> 00:15:23.429
Just head over to pbsspacetime.com/shop&nbsp;
or click the links in the description.

